Comprehensive Genomic Profiling of Advanced Penile Carcinoma Suggests a High Frequency of Clinically Relevant Genomic Alterations.

BACKGROUND Advanced penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC) is associated with poor survival due to the aggressiveness of the disease and lack of effective systemic therapies. Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) was performed to identify clinically relevant genomic alterations (CRGAs). MATERIALS AND METHODS DNA was extracted from 40 μm of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections in patients with advanced PSCC. CGP was performed on hybridization-captured, adaptor ligation-based libraries to a mean coverage depth of 692× for 3,769 exons of 236 cancer-related genes plus 47 introns from 19 genes frequently rearranged in cancer. CRGAs were defined as genomic alterations (GAs) linked to targeted therapies on the market or under evaluation in mechanism-driven clinical trials. RESULTS Twenty male patients with a median age of 60 years (range, 46-87 years) were assessed. Seventeen (85%) cases were stage IV and three cases (15%) were stage III. CGP revealed 109 GAs (5.45 per tumor), 44 of which were CRGAs (2.2 per tumor). At least one CRGA was detected in 19 (95%) cases, and the most common CRGAs were CDKN2A point mutations and homozygous deletion (40%), NOTCH1 point mutations and rearrangements (25%), PIK3CA point mutations and amplification (25%), EGFR amplification (20%), CCND1 amplification (20%), BRCA2 insertions/deletions (10%), RICTOR amplifications (10%), and FBXW7 point mutations (10%). CONCLUSION CGP identified CRGAs in patients with advanced PSCC, including EGFR amplification and PIK3CA alterations, which can lead to the rational administration of targeted therapy and subsequent benefit for these patients. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Few treatment options exist for patients with advanced penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC). Outcomes are dismal with platinum-based chemotherapy, with median survival estimated at 1 year or less across multiple series. Biological studies of patients with PSCC to date have principally focused on human papillomavirus status, but few studies have elucidated molecular drivers of the disease. To this end, comprehensive genomic profiling was performed in a cohort of 20 patients with advanced PSCC. Findings of frequent mutations in CDKN2A, NOTCH1, PIK3CA, and EGFR (all in excess of 20%) point to potential therapeutic avenues. Trials of targeted therapies directed toward these mutations should be explored.

[1]  James X. Sun,et al.  Comprehensive genomic profiling of anal squamous cell carcinoma to reveal frequency of clinically relevant genomic alterations in the PI3K/mTOR pathway. , 2015 .

[2]  I. Shih,et al.  Immunohistochemical expression of ARID1A in penile squamous cell carcinomas: a tissue microarray study of 112 cases. , 2015, Human pathology.

[3]  F. Vidal,et al.  Prevalence of human papillomavirus in penile malignant tumors: viral genotyping and clinical aspects , 2015, BMC Urology.

[4]  C. Scapulatempo-Neto,et al.  Genomic Profiling of Human Penile Carcinoma Predicts Worse Prognosis and Survival , 2014, Cancer Prevention Research.

[5]  M. Fassan,et al.  Profiling of expression of human papillomavirus-related cancer miRNAs in penile squamous cell carcinomas. , 2014, The American journal of pathology.

[6]  S. Fox,et al.  Loss of CDKN2A expression is a frequent event in primary invasive melanoma and correlates with sensitivity to the CDK4/6 inhibitor PD0332991 in melanoma cell lines , 2014, Pigment cell & melanoma research.

[7]  C. Ng,et al.  Epidermal growth factor receptor‐targeted therapy in locally advanced or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the penis , 2014, BJU international.

[8]  M. Socinski,et al.  Temsirolimus therapy in a patient with lung adenocarcinoma harboring an FBXW7 mutation. , 2014, Lung cancer.

[9]  Trevor J Pugh,et al.  Landscape of genomic alterations in cervical carcinomas , 2013, Nature.

[10]  J. Tabernero,et al.  Panitumumab-FOLFOX4 treatment and RAS mutations in colorectal cancer. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  M. Blagosklonny,et al.  CDK4/6-inhibiting drug substitutes for p21 and p16 in senescence , 2013, Cell cycle.

[12]  A. Belldegrun,et al.  PD-0332991, a potent and selective inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6, demonstrates inhibition of proliferation in renal cell carcinoma at nanomolar concentrations and molecular markers predict for sensitivity. , 2013, Anticancer research.

[13]  R. Burbano,et al.  Human Papilloma Virus: Prevalence, distribution and predictive value to lymphatic metastasis in penile carcinoma. , 2013, International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology.

[14]  C. Sotiriou,et al.  PIK3CA Genotype and a PIK3CA Mutation-Related Gene Signature and Response to Everolimus and Letrozole in Estrogen Receptor Positive Breast Cancer , 2013, PloS one.

[15]  J. Sarkaria,et al.  p16-Cdk4-Rb axis controls sensitivity to a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor PD0332991 in glioblastoma xenograft cells. , 2012, Neuro-oncology.

[16]  E. Matano,et al.  Combination of docetaxel and cetuximab for penile cancer: a case report and literature review , 2012, Anti-cancer drugs.

[17]  E. Velazquez,et al.  New pathologic entities in penile carcinomas: an update of the 2004 world health organization classification. , 2012, Seminars in diagnostic pathology.

[18]  F. Elgh,et al.  Human papillomavirus prevalence, distribution and correlation to histopathological parameters in a large Swedish cohort of men with penile carcinoma , 2011, BJU international.

[19]  R. Verhoeven,et al.  Incidence trends and survival of penile squamous cell carcinoma in the Netherlands , 2011, International journal of cancer.

[20]  P. Thall,et al.  Neoadjuvant paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin chemotherapy for metastatic penile cancer: a phase II study. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[21]  F. Algaba,et al.  EAU penile cancer guidelines 2009. , 2010, European urology.

[22]  J. Wohlfahrt,et al.  Risk Factors for Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Penis—Population-Based Case-Control Study in Denmark , 2008, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[23]  C. Meijer,et al.  Human papillomavirus-16 is the predominant type etiologically involved in penile squamous cell carcinoma. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[24]  E. Campo,et al.  Genetic and molecular pathogenesis of mantle cell lymphoma: perspectives for new targeted therapeutics , 2007, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[25]  Zhang Jun,et al.  Interpretation of NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology:Cervical Cancer (Version 1.2016) , 2016 .

[26]  Xin Huang,et al.  The cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor palbociclib in combination with letrozole versus letrozole alone as first-line treatment of oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative, advanced breast cancer (PALOMA-1/TRIO-18): a randomised phase 2 study. , 2015, The Lancet. Oncology.

[27]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2015 , 2015, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[28]  J. Pinski,et al.  Epidermal growth factor receptor-targeted therapy in squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: a report of 3 cases. , 2014, Urology.

[29]  N. Dubrawsky Cancer statistics , 1989, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.