Deflection, Acceleration, and Force Corridors for Small Females in Side Impacts

Objective. This study was undertaken to develop biomechanical corridors applicable to the small-sized female in side impacts. Methods. Sled tests were conducted using post mortem human subjects at a velocity of 6.7 m/s. Three chestbands were used to compute deflection-time histories at the axilla, xyphoid process, and tenth rib levels. Triaxial accelerometers were fixed to the upper and lower spine and sacrum to record acceleration-time histories. Specimens contacted the load wall with varying initial conditions (rigid and padded; flat wall and offset) from which impact forces to the thoracic, abdominal, and pelvic regions were obtained using load cell data. Adopting signal processing and mass-based scaling methods, corridors were derived for forces, accelerations, and chest deflections at three levels for all initial conditions. Results. All time history corridors were expressed as mean plus/minus one standard deviation and provided in the article. Conclusions. Acceleration-, deflection-, and force-time corridors obtained for the chest and pelvic regions of the human body will assist in the assessment of anthropomorphic test devices used in crashworthiness evaluations.

[1]  Rolf H Eppinger,et al.  Development of a new biofidelity ranking system for anthropomorphic test devices. , 2002, Stapp car crash journal.

[2]  Srirangam Kumaresan,et al.  Impact biomechanics of the human thorax-abdomen complex , 1997 .

[3]  Matthew R. Maltese,et al.  CHESTBAND ANALYSIS OF HUMAN TOLERANCE TO SIDE IMPACT , 1997 .

[4]  N Yoganandan,et al.  Biomechanics of human thoracic ribs. , 1998, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[5]  G Ray,et al.  Stiffness and strain energy criteria to evaluate the threshold of injury to an intervertebral joint. , 1989, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  Rolf H. Eppinger,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF A PROMISING UNIVERSAL THORACIC TRAUMA PREDICTION METHODOLOGY , 1978 .

[7]  Rolf H. Eppinger,et al.  Prediction of thoracic injury using measurable experimental parameters , 1976 .

[8]  Rolf H Eppinger,et al.  Development of Side Impact Thoracic Injury Criteria and Their Application to the Modified ES-2 Dummy with Rib Extensions (ES-2re). , 2003, Stapp car crash journal.

[9]  G. M. Davis The Department of Transportation , 1970 .

[10]  Ulf Liljenqvist,et al.  Rasterstereographic back shape analysis in idiopathic scoliosis after posterior correction and fusion. , 2003, Clinical biomechanics.

[11]  Matthew R. Maltese,et al.  BIOFIDELITY EVALUATION OF RECENT SIDE IMPACT DUMMIES , 2002 .

[12]  L. M. Patrick,et al.  Strength and response of the human neck , 1971 .

[13]  Harold J. Mertz,et al.  SID-IIS BETA+-PROTOTYPE DUMMY BIOMECHANICAL RESPONSES , 1998 .

[14]  C. K. Kroell,et al.  Impact Response of the Human Thorax , 1973 .

[15]  John W. Melvin,et al.  Assessment of air bag deployment loads with the small female Hybrid III dummy , 1993 .

[16]  Rolf H. Eppinger,et al.  Development of dummy and injury index for NHTSA's thoracic side impact protection research program , 1984 .

[17]  Narayan Yoganandan,et al.  Biomechanics of temporo-parietal skull fracture. , 2004, Clinical biomechanics.

[18]  N. Yoganandan,et al.  Gender dependent cervical spine segmental kinematics during whiplash. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  John H Bolte,et al.  Shoulder impact response and injury due to lateral and oblique loading. , 2003, Stapp car crash journal.

[20]  Rolf H Eppinger,et al.  Response corridors of human surrogates in lateral impacts. , 2002, Stapp car crash journal.