Managing multiple markets: big firms and PFI

The Private Finance Initiative (PFI) is frequently portrayed as a vehicle for change for the UK construction sector. Significant change in the working practices of construction companies is predicted as new business models based on whole-life value creation emerge. This paper shifts the focus of discussion from projected ideals and possible developments to the current situation. More specifically, it focuses on the challenges that large firms participating in both PFI and traditional markets face. The analysis focuses on the relations between business units and on day-to-day challenges to greater long-term commitment, through life-service provision and increased integration between construction and service provision. The paper offers insights into the effects of PFI on construction practice and their implications for theorizing on organizational and strategic change. It suggests abandoning a simplistic model of the centralized, homogenous firm and instead capturing the dynamics of decentralized, large firms working in multiple markets on a variety of projects. This would assist in the provision of more realistic and fruitful models of how to realize the PFI vision. L'Initiative Financière Privée (Private Finance Initiative – PFI; contrats de concession d'ouvrages publics à paiements publics) est fréquemment dépeinte comme un moyen de faire évoluer l'industrie britannique du bâtiment. D'importants changements dans les pratiques de travail des entreprises du bâtiment sont à prévoir au fur et à mesure qu'apparaissent de nouveaux modèles d'entreprise basés sur la création de valeur pour toute la durée du cycle de vie. Cet article déplace le centre de la discussion des idéaux envisagés et des développements possibles à la situation actuelle. De manière plus précise, il se concentre sur les défis auxquels se trouvent confrontées les grandes entreprises qui participent à la fois aux marchés PFI et aux marchés traditionnels. L'article porte principalement sur les relations entre les Business Units et sur les défis qui se posent au quotidien par rapport à un engagement à long terme plus grand, au maintien de la qualité des prestations pendant la durée du cycle de vie, à une plus grande intégration entre la construction et les prestations fournies. L'étude de cas et l'analyse élargie qui sont présentées permettent une évaluation de l'effet des contrats PFI sur les pratiques du bâtiment et une théorisation sur les organisations et les changements stratégiques. L'article suggère d'abandonner le modèle simpliste de l'entreprise homogène, centralisée, et de s'inspirer plutôt de la dynamique des grandes entreprises décentralisées opérant dans de multiples marchés sur des projets variés. Cela contribuerait à fournir des modèles plus réalistes et féconds permettant de savoir comment concrétiser la vision PFI. Mots clés: travail collaboratif entreprises de construction solutions intégrées marchés multiples Initiative Financière Privée (PFI) initiative financière publique création de valeur

[1]  L. Zucker Institutional Theories of Organization , 1987 .

[2]  J. Shaoul,et al.  Planning the “new” NHS: downsizing for the 21st century , 1999, BMJ.

[3]  R. Leiringer Technological innovation in PPPs: incentives, opportunities and actions , 2006 .

[4]  A. Davies,et al.  Systems Integration: a Core Capability of the Modern Corporation , 2022 .

[5]  Lawrie Haynes,et al.  Commercialising the management and maintenance of trunk roads in the United Kingdom , 1999 .

[6]  Stuart D. Green,et al.  Re-engineering construction: going against the grain , 2003 .

[7]  M. Lewis,et al.  Evaluating the risks of public private partnerships for infrastructure projects , 2002 .

[8]  A. Akintoye,et al.  Critical success factors for PPP/PFI projects in the UK construction industry , 2005 .

[9]  T. Kostova,et al.  Organizational Legitimacy Under Conditions of Complexity: The Case of the Multinational Enterprise , 1999 .

[10]  C. Oliver,et al.  The legitimacy of strategic alliances: an institutional perspective , 2007 .

[11]  L. Zucker Institutional patterns and organizations : culture and environment , 1989 .

[12]  Martin Betts,et al.  An examination on the sustainable competitive advantage of private finance initiative projects , 2002 .

[13]  Graham Winch,et al.  Zephyrs of creative destruction: understanding the management of innovation in construction , 1998 .

[14]  Andrew Davies,et al.  Can integrated solutions business models work in construction? , 2005 .

[15]  H. Robinson,et al.  Service delivery and performance monitoring in PFI/PPP projects , 2009 .

[16]  J. Pfeffer Management as symbolic action: the creation and maintenance of organizational paradigms , 1981 .

[17]  Jean Shaoul,et al.  A critical financial analysis of the Private Finance Initiative: Selecting a financing method or allocating economic wealth? , 2005 .

[18]  M. Flinders,et al.  The Politics of Public–Private Partnerships , 2005 .

[19]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Explaining Development and Change in Organizations , 1995 .

[20]  Scott Fernie,et al.  Making sense of supply chain management: a comparative study of aerospace and construction , 2005 .

[21]  Chimay J. Anumba,et al.  A Knowledge Transfer Framework: the PFI context , 2006 .

[22]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[23]  T. Dixon,et al.  Project management and the private finance initiative , 2004 .

[24]  Blake E. Ashforth,et al.  The Double-Edge of Organizational Legitimation , 1990 .

[25]  David Tranfield,et al.  Coordinating for service delivery in public-private partnership and private finance initiative construction projects: Early findings from an exploratory study , 2005 .

[26]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[27]  B. Loasby The External Control of Organizations. A Resource Dependence Perspective , 1979 .

[28]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  Organizational Legitimacy , 1975 .

[29]  P Hall,et al.  PFI- THE LAST CHANCE SALOON? , 1998 .

[30]  C. Duffield,et al.  Improved PFI/PPP service outcomes through the integration of Alliance principles , 2006 .

[31]  Andrew Edkins,et al.  Constructors' Key Guide to PFI , 1998 .

[32]  Robert N. Stern,et al.  The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. , 1979 .

[33]  Jurong Zheng,et al.  The Dynamics of Contractual and Relational Governance: Evidence From Long-Term Public-Private Procurement Arrangements , 2008 .

[34]  Richard Saxon The industry 'formerly known as construction': an industry view of the Fairclough Review , 2002 .

[35]  A. Davies Moving base into high-value integrated solutions: a value stream approach , 2004 .

[36]  Jeff Zitron,et al.  Public–private partnership projects: Towards a model of contractor bidding decision-making , 2006 .

[37]  Great Britain. Comptroller Benchmarking and market testing the ongoing services component of PFI projects , 2007 .

[38]  Peer C. Fiss,et al.  The Symbolic Management of Strategic Change: Sensegiving Via Framing and Decoupling , 2006 .

[39]  L. Zucker The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence. , 1977 .

[40]  A. Salter,et al.  The great experiment:public-private partnerships and innovation in design, production and operation of capital goods in the UK , 2006 .

[41]  Walter W. Powell,et al.  Cultivating an institutional ecology of organizations: comment on Hannan, Carroll, Dundon, and Torres , 1995 .

[42]  Jay R. Galbraith Organizing to Deliver Solutions , 2002 .

[43]  Jane Broadbent,et al.  Control and Legitimation in Government Accountability Processes: The Private Finance Initiative in the UK , 2001 .

[44]  Andrew Davies,et al.  Creating value by delivering integrated solutions , 2005 .

[45]  Stuart D. Green,et al.  Lean construction: arenas of enactment, models of diffusion and the meaning of ‘leanness’ , 2005 .

[46]  M. Pitt,et al.  The private finance initiative and value for money , 2006 .

[47]  Stewart Player,et al.  An Examination of the UK Treasury's Evidence Base for Cost and Time Overrun Data in UK Value-for-Money Policy and Appraisal , 2007 .

[48]  J. Broadbent,et al.  Accounting choices: technical and political trade‐offs and the UK’s private finance initiative , 2002 .

[49]  Martine Buser,et al.  Emerging metagovernance as an institutional framework for public private partnership networks in Denmark , 2006 .

[50]  G. Clark,et al.  Infrastructure shortfall in the United Kingdom: the private finance initiative and government policy , 1999 .

[51]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutional Environments and Organizations: Structural Complexity and Individualism , 1994 .

[52]  H. Smyth,et al.  Relationship management in the management of PFI/PPP projects in the UK , 2007 .

[53]  Dennis A. Gioia,et al.  Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation , 1991 .

[54]  Mark C. Suchman Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches , 1995 .

[55]  James Barlow,et al.  The private finance initiative, project form and design innovation: The UK's hospitals programme , 2008 .

[56]  Michael Dickinson,et al.  An evaluation of the stimulants and impediments to innovation within PFI/PPP projects , 2006 .

[57]  J. Shaoul Using the Private Sector to Finance Capital Expenditure: The Financial Realities , 2009 .

[58]  B. Salter,et al.  The Evolution of a ‘Meta-Policy’: The Case of the Private Finance Initiative and the Health Sector , 2004 .

[59]  D. Doane Beyond corporate social responsibility: minnows, mammoths and markets , 2005 .

[60]  Graeme Bowles,et al.  Public–private partnerships and contract negotiations: an empirical study , 2004 .

[61]  Graham Winch,et al.  Institutional reform in British construction: partnering and private finance , 2000 .

[62]  Nandini Rajagopalan,et al.  TOWARD A THEORY OF STRATEGIC CHANGE: A MULTI-LENS PERSPECTIVE AND INTEGRATIVE FRAMEWORK , 1997 .