Bayesian order constrained adaptive design for phase II clinical trials evaluating subgroup-specific treatment effect

The “one-size-fits-all’’ paradigm is inappropriate for phase II clinical trials evaluating biotherapies, which are often expected to have substantial heterogeneous treatment effects among different subgroups defined by biomarker. For these biotherapies, the objective of phase II clinical trials is often to evaluate subgroup-specific treatment effects. In this article, we propose a simple yet efficient Bayesian adaptive phase II biomarker-guided design, referred to as the Bayesian-order constrained adaptive design, to detect the subgroup-specific treatment effects of biotherapies. The Bayesian order constrained adaptive design combines the features of the enrichment design and sequential design. It starts with a “all-comers” stage, and subsequently switches to an enrichment stage for either the marker-positive subgroup or marker-negative subgroup, depending on the interim analysis results. The go/no go enrichment criteria are determined by two posterior probabilities utilizing the inherent ordering constraint between two subgroups. We also extend the Bayesian-order constrained adaptive design to handle the missing biomarker situation. We conducted comprehensive computer simulation studies to investigate the operating characteristics of the Bayesian order constrained adaptive design, and compared it with other existing and conventional designs. The results shown that the Bayesian order constrained adaptive design yielded the best overall performance in detecting the subgroup-specific treatment effects by jointly considering the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of the trials. The software for simulation and trial implementation are available for free download.

[1]  Dongsheng Xu,et al.  Predictive biomarkers for cancer immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors , 2020, Biomarker Research.

[2]  J. Milanowski,et al.  CheckMate 171: A phase 2 trial of nivolumab in patients with previously treated advanced squamous non-small cell lung cancer, including ECOG PS 2 and elderly populations. , 2020, European journal of cancer.

[3]  Kongming Wu,et al.  The efficacy and safety of combination of PD-1 and CTLA-4 inhibitors: a meta-analysis , 2019, Experimental Hematology & Oncology.

[4]  S. Vesely,et al.  Paradoxical effects of obesity on T cell function during tumor progression and PD-1 checkpoint blockade , 2018, Nature Medicine.

[5]  P Dutton,et al.  Single arm two‐stage studies: Improved designs for molecularly targeted agents , 2018, Pharmaceutical statistics.

[6]  Ying Yuan,et al.  Optimal sequential enrichment designs for phase II clinical trials , 2017, Statistics in medicine.

[7]  L. Wernisch,et al.  An optimal stratified Simon two‐stage design , 2016, Pharmaceutical statistics.

[8]  A. Tsimberidou,et al.  Targeted therapy in cancer , 2015, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

[9]  H. Kaufman Precision immunology: the promise of immunotherapy for the treatment of cancer. , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  N. Simon,et al.  Adaptive enrichment designs for clinical trials. , 2013, Biostatistics.

[11]  Guosheng Yin,et al.  Fundamentals of Clinical Trials , 2012 .

[12]  Bradley P. Carlin,et al.  Bayesian Adaptive Methods for Clinical Trials , 2010 .

[13]  V. Johnson,et al.  Bayesian Design of Single-arm Phase II Clinical Trials with Continuous Monitoring , 2009, Clinical trials.

[14]  Edward S. Kim,et al.  Gefitinib versus docetaxel in previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (INTEREST): a randomised phase III trial , 2008, The Lancet.

[15]  H. Choy,et al.  Cooperative group research efforts in lung cancer 2008: focus on advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2008, Clinical lung cancer.

[16]  J Jack Lee,et al.  Bayesian adaptive randomization designs for targeted agent development , 2008, Clinical trials.

[17]  J Jack Lee,et al.  A predictive probability design for phase II cancer clinical trials , 2008, Clinical trials.

[18]  Lajos Pusztai,et al.  Pharmacogenomic Predictor Discovery in Phase II Clinical Trials for Breast Cancer , 2007, Clinical Cancer Research.

[19]  E. Holmgren,et al.  An adaptive Simon Two-Stage Design for Phase 2 studies of targeted therapies. , 2007, Contemporary clinical trials.

[20]  C. Rooney,et al.  Improving T cell therapy for cancer. , 2007, Expert opinion on biological therapy.

[21]  S. Mukherjee,et al.  A genomic strategy to refine prognosis in early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  R. Simon,et al.  Evaluating the Efficiency of Targeted Designs for Randomized Clinical Trials , 2004, Clinical Cancer Research.

[23]  Weichung J Shih,et al.  Adaptive Two‐Stage Designs for Single‐Arm Phase IIA Cancer Clinical Trials , 2004, Biometrics.

[24]  D. Goodsell The molecular perspective: tamoxifen and the estrogen receptor. , 2002, Stem cells.

[25]  Jonathan Shuster,et al.  Optimal two-stage designs for single arm Phase II cancer trials , 2002, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics.

[26]  S H Jung,et al.  Graphical search for two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials. , 2001, Controlled clinical trials.

[27]  E. Gehan,et al.  A modification of Simon's optimal design for phase II trials when the criterion is median sample size. , 1999, Controlled clinical trials.

[28]  T. Chen,et al.  Optimal three-stage designs for phase II cancer clinical trials. , 1997, Statistics in medicine.

[29]  D. Heitjan,et al.  Bayesian interim analysis of phase II cancer clinical trials. , 1997, Statistics in medicine.

[30]  P. Thall,et al.  Bayesian sequential monitoring designs for single-arm clinical trials with multiple outcomes. , 1995, Statistics in medicine.

[31]  P F Thall,et al.  An optimal three-stage design for phase II clinical trials. , 1994, Statistics in medicine.

[32]  P F Thall,et al.  Practical Bayesian guidelines for phase IIB clinical trials. , 1994, Biometrics.

[33]  R. Simon,et al.  Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials. , 1989, Controlled clinical trials.

[34]  S. Piantadosi Clinical Trials : A Methodologic Perspective , 2005 .