Kanizsa subjective figures can act as occluding surfaces at parallel stages of visual search

Four experiments examined whether Kanizsa subjective figures can induce amodal completion of a notched circle at parallel stages of visual search. Search for the notched circle among full circles was slow and inefficient when the notched circle appeared stereoscopically behind an abutting subjective surface, as if occluded by it. However, search became efficient and parallel when the notched and completed circles appeared nearer so that the subjective figures could not act as occluders. Control studies ruled out explanations in terms of low spatial frequencies, grouping of aligned edges, or the depth of the circles per se. Multiple Kanizsa subjective figures can be coded in parallel as occluding surfaces; such coding is obligatory because it arises even when highly detrimental to performance.

[1]  Joel S. Warm,et al.  The Role of Illumination Level in the Strength of Subjective Contours , 1987 .

[2]  H J Müller,et al.  Visual search for singleton feature targets within and across feature dimensions , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  Michael J. Hawken,et al.  Macaque VI neurons can signal ‘illusory’ contours , 1993, Nature.

[4]  James T. Enns,et al.  2 The Nature of Selectivity in Early Human Vision , 1992 .

[5]  Fk Ruskin,et al.  Rivista di Psicologia , 1953 .

[6]  C. Redies Discontinuities along lines: Psychophysics and neurophysiology , 1989, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[7]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. , 1977 .

[8]  Jeremy M. Wolfe,et al.  Just Say No: How Are Visual Searches Terminated When There Is No Target Present? , 1996, Cognitive Psychology.

[9]  C. Koch,et al.  Spatial displacement, but not temporal asynchrony, destroys figural binding , 1995, Vision Research.

[10]  L. Finkel,et al.  Intermediate-Level Visual Representations and the Construction of Surface Perception , 1995, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[11]  Jon Driver,et al.  Parallel detection of Kanizsa subjective figures in the human visual system , 1994, Nature.

[12]  D Lehmann,et al.  Segments of event-related potential map series reveal landscape changes with visual attention and subjective contours. , 1989, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[13]  James T. Enns,et al.  Preemption effects in visual search: evidence for low-level grouping. , 1995 .

[14]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  VSearch: Macintosh software for experiments in visual search , 1990 .

[15]  A Treisman,et al.  Feature analysis in early vision: evidence from search asymmetries. , 1988, Psychological review.

[16]  J. Warm,et al.  Attentional processing and the subjective contour illusion. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[17]  Zijiang J. He,et al.  Surfaces versus features in visual search , 1992, Nature.

[18]  Claude Bonnet,et al.  Subthreshold summation with illusory contours , 1995, Vision Research.

[19]  The Kanizsa square does not engender a configural superiority effect , 1993 .

[20]  Ennio Mingolla,et al.  Neural dynamics of perceptual grouping: Textures, boundaries, and emergent segmentations , 1985 .

[21]  Arthur F. Kramer,et al.  Limits of focused attention in three-dimensional space , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[22]  S. Yantis Perceived Continuity of Occluded Visual Objects , 1995 .

[23]  S. Petry,et al.  The Perception of Illusory Contours , 1987 .

[24]  P Wenderoth,et al.  Psychophysical evidence for area V2 involvement in the reduction of subjective contour tilt aftereffects by binocular rivalry , 1994, Visual Neuroscience.

[25]  E. Mingolla,et al.  Neon Color Spreading: A Review , 1997, Perception.

[26]  R. Lawson,et al.  Stereoscopic enhancement and erasure of subjective contours. , 1974, Journal of experimental psychology.

[27]  Clare Porac,et al.  Set and Subjective Contour , 1987 .

[28]  James R. Bergen,et al.  Parallel versus serial processing in rapid pattern discrimination , 1983, Nature.

[29]  J. Townsend Serial vs. Parallel Processing: Sometimes They Look like Tweedledum and Tweedledee but they can (and Should) be Distinguished , 1990 .

[30]  E. Peterhans,et al.  Subjective contours - bridging the gap between psychophysics and physiology , 1991, Trends in Neurosciences.

[31]  L. Spillmann,et al.  Phenomena of Illusory Form: Can We Bridge the Gap between Levels of Explanation? , 1995, Perception.

[32]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Preattentive recovery of three-dimensional orientation from line drawings. , 1991, Psychological review.

[33]  R. L. Gregory,et al.  Illusory contours and stereo depth , 1974 .

[34]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[35]  I. Rock,et al.  Illusory Contours as the Solution to a Problem , 1979, Perception.

[36]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[37]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Serial and parallel processing of visual feature conjunctions , 1986, Nature.

[38]  Deborah J. Aks,et al.  Visual search for direction of shading is influenced by apparent depth , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[39]  J. Palmer Attention in Visual Search: Distinguishing Four Causes of a Set-Size Effect , 1995 .

[40]  Stephen E. Palmer,et al.  Perception of partly occluded objects: A microgenetic analysis. , 1992 .

[41]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[42]  G K Humphrey,et al.  Parallel discrimination of subjective contours defined by offset gratings , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[43]  J. Theeuwes Abrupt luminance change pops out; abrupt color change does not , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[44]  S. Dumais,et al.  Ambiguous cognitive contours , 1975, Nature.

[45]  W. Gerbino,et al.  Amodal Completion and Illusory Figures: An Information-Processing Analysis , 1987 .

[46]  W. L. Brigner,et al.  Subjective Contour: Apparent Depth or Simultaneous Brightness Contrast? , 1974, Perceptual and motor skills.

[47]  I Rock,et al.  Further Evidence of Failure of Reversal of Ambiguous Figures by Uninformed Subjects , 1992, Perception.

[48]  V. S. Ramachandran,et al.  Visual Perception of Surfaces: A Biological Theory , 1987 .

[49]  M. Bonaiuto,et al.  Visual Illusory Productions with or without Amodal Completion , 1991, Perception.

[50]  The Perception of Illusory Contours: A Skills Analysis , 1987 .

[51]  J Gordon,et al.  Nonlinearity in the perception of form , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[52]  J. Kennedy,et al.  A Figure-Density Hypothesis and Illusory Contour Brightness , 1976, Perception.

[53]  Gregory W. Lesher,et al.  Illusory contours: Toward a neurally based perceptual theory , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.