On the origin of contact-electrification

Abstract Although contact electrification (triboelectrification) (CE) has been documented since 2600 years ago, its scientific understanding remains inconclusive, unclear, and un-unified. This paper reviews the updated progress for studying the fundamental mechanism of CE using Kelvin probe force microscopy for solid–solid cases. Our conclusion is that electron transfer is the dominant mechanism for CE between solid–solid pairs. Electron transfer occurs only when the interatomic distance between the two materials is shorter than the normal bonding length (typically ∼0.2 nm) in the region of repulsive forces. A strong electron cloud overlap (or wave function overlap) between the two atoms/molecules in the repulsive region leads to electron transition between the atoms/molecules, owing to the reduced interatomic potential barrier. The role played by contact/friction force is to induce strong overlap between the electron clouds (or wave function in physics, bonding in chemistry). The electrostatic charges on the surfaces can be released from the surface by electron thermionic emission and/or photon excitation, so these electrostatic charges may not remain on the surface if sample temperature is higher than ∼300–400 °C. The electron transfer model could be extended to liquid–solid, liquid–gas and even liquid–liquid cases. As for the liquid–solid case, molecules in the liquid would have electron cloud overlap with the atoms on the solid surface at the very first contact with a virginal solid surface, and electron transfer is required in order to create the first layer of electrostatic charges on the solid surface. This step only occurs for the very first contact of the liquid with the solid. Then, ion transfer is the second step and is the dominant process thereafter, which is a redistribution of the ions in solution considering electrostatic interactions with the charged solid surface. This is proposed as a two-step formation process of the electric double layer (EDL) at the liquid–solid interface. Charge transfer in the liquid–gas case is believed to be due to electron transfer once a gas molecule strikes the liquid surface to induce the overlapping electron cloud under pressure. In general, electron transfer due to the overlapping electron cloud under mechanical force/pressure is proposed as the dominant mechanism for initiating CE between solids, liquids and gases. This study provides not only the first systematic understanding about the physics of CE, but also demonstrates that the triboelectric nanogenerator (TENG) is an effective method for studying the nature of CE between any materials.

[1]  P. Mehrani,et al.  Investigation of electrostatic charge distribution within the reactor wall fouling and bulk regions of a gas–solid fluidized bed , 2013 .

[2]  P. Alam ‘A’ , 2021, Composites Engineering: An A–Z Guide.

[3]  Faheem Khan,et al.  Direct-current triboelectricity generation by a sliding Schottky nanocontact on MoS2 multilayers , 2018, Nature Nanotechnology.

[4]  J. Fuhrmann,et al.  Contact electrification of dielectric solids , 1978 .

[5]  Zhong Lin Wang,et al.  Effect of contact- and sliding-mode electrification on nanoscale charge transfer for energy harvesting , 2016, Nano Research.

[6]  T. Burgo,et al.  Friction coefficient dependence on electrostatic tribocharging , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[7]  J. E. Stern,et al.  Contact electrification using force microscopy. , 1989, Physical review letters.

[8]  Faheem Khan,et al.  Sustained electron tunneling at unbiased metal-insulator-semiconductor triboelectric contacts , 2018, Nano Energy.

[9]  D. Lacks,et al.  First-Principles Study of the Charge Distributions in Water Confined between Dissimilar Surfaces and Implications in Regard to Contact Electrification , 2017 .

[10]  Jinyong Wang,et al.  Kelvin probe force microscopy study on nanotriboelectrification , 2010 .

[11]  Chem. , 2020, Catalysis from A to Z.

[12]  A. Bachtold,et al.  Charging and discharging of graphene in ambient conditions studied with scanning probe microscopy , 2009 .

[13]  A. Diaz,et al.  Contact electrification: ion transfer to metals and polymers , 1991 .

[14]  Zhong Lin Wang Triboelectric nanogenerators as new energy technology for self-powered systems and as active mechanical and chemical sensors. , 2013, ACS nano.

[15]  Tao Jiang,et al.  Toward the blue energy dream by triboelectric nanogenerator networks , 2017 .

[16]  Zhong Lin Wang,et al.  Progress in triboelectric nanogenerators as a new energy technology and self-powered sensors , 2015 .

[17]  B. Grzybowski,et al.  Is water necessary for contact electrification? , 2011, Angewandte Chemie.

[18]  L. B. Schein,et al.  Theory of insulator charging , 1992 .

[19]  P. Alam,et al.  R , 1823, The Herodotus Encyclopedia.

[20]  B. Grzybowski,et al.  Contact electrification between identical materials. , 2010, Angewandte Chemie.

[21]  Zhong Lin Wang,et al.  On the Electron‐Transfer Mechanism in the Contact‐Electrification Effect , 2018, Advanced materials.

[22]  Zhong Lin Wang,et al.  Excluding Contact Electrification in Surface Potential Measurement Using Kelvin Probe Force Microscopy. , 2016, ACS nano.

[23]  Yaliang Li,et al.  SCI , 2021, Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management.

[24]  D. Lacks,et al.  Particle size effects in particle-particle triboelectric charging studied with an integrated fluidized bed and electrostatic separator system. , 2014, The Review of scientific instruments.

[25]  R. Horn,et al.  Contact Electrification and Adhesion Between Dissimilar Materials , 1992, Science.

[26]  F. A. Vick Theory of contact electrification , 1953 .

[27]  Daniel J. Lacks,et al.  Contact charging between surfaces of identical insulating materials in asymmetric geometries , 2011 .

[28]  L. B. Schein,et al.  General model of sphere-sphere insulator contact electrification , 1995 .

[29]  P. Alam ‘W’ , 2021, Composites Engineering.

[30]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[31]  W. R. Harper Contact and frictional electrification , 1967 .

[32]  Zhong Lin Wang,et al.  Electron Transfer in Nanoscale Contact Electrification: Effect of Temperature in the Metal–Dielectric Case , 2019, Advanced materials.

[33]  Keith M. Forward,et al.  Charge segregation depends on particle size in triboelectrically charged granular materials. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[34]  Rusen Yang,et al.  Effect of humidity and pressure on the triboelectric nanogenerator , 2013 .

[35]  D. Lacks,et al.  First-principles calculation of contact electrification and validation by experiment , 2016 .

[36]  Zhong Lin Wang,et al.  In situ quantitative study of nanoscale triboelectrification and patterning. , 2013, Nano letters.

[37]  Zhong Lin Wang On Maxwell's displacement current for energy and sensors: the origin of nanogenerators , 2017 .

[38]  J. Breza,et al.  Extended thermionic emission-diffusion theory of charge transport through a Schottky diode , 1996 .

[39]  Zhong Lin Wang,et al.  Flexible triboelectric generator , 2012 .

[40]  J Lowell,et al.  Triboelectrification of identical insulators. II. Theory and further experiments , 1986 .

[41]  J. Lowell The role of material transfer in contact electrification , 1977 .

[42]  B. Baytekin,et al.  Minimizing friction, wear, and energy losses by eliminating contact charging , 2018, Science Advances.

[43]  Zhong Lin Wang,et al.  Contact-Electrification between Two Identical Materials: Curvature Effect. , 2019, ACS nano.

[44]  P. E. Shaw,et al.  The Electrical Charges from Like Solids , 1926, Nature.

[45]  P. Alam ‘L’ , 2021, Composites Engineering: An A–Z Guide.

[46]  Zhong Lin Wang,et al.  Achieving ultrahigh triboelectric charge density for efficient energy harvesting , 2017, Nature Communications.

[47]  George M Whitesides,et al.  Electrostatic self-assembly of polystyrene microspheres by using chemically directed contact electrification. , 2007, Angewandte Chemie.

[48]  Yuanyue Zhang,et al.  Effect of contact deformation on contact electrification: a first-principles calculation , 2013 .

[49]  K. Kanazawa,et al.  Surface Potential Map of Charged Ionomer-Polymer Blends Studied with a Scanning Kelvin Probe , 1994 .

[50]  Zhong Lin Wang,et al.  Theory of contact electrification: Optical transitions in two-level systems , 2018, Nano Energy.

[51]  B. Grzybowski,et al.  The Mosaic of Surface Charge in Contact Electrification , 2011, Science.

[52]  A. Bard,et al.  Electrons on dielectrics and contact electrification , 2009 .

[53]  G.S.P. Castle,et al.  Bipolar charging of poly-disperse polymer powders in fluidized beds , 2003 .

[54]  R. A. Oriani,et al.  Detection of Effects of Low Electric Fields with the Kelvin Probe , 1993 .

[55]  Simiao Niu,et al.  Manipulating nanoscale contact electrification by an applied electric field. , 2014, Nano letters.

[56]  C. R. Crowell The Richardson constant for thermionic emission in Schottky barrier diodes , 1965 .

[57]  友紀子 中川 SoC , 2021, Journal of Japan Society for Fuzzy Theory and Intelligent Informatics.

[58]  Danna Zhou,et al.  d. , 1840, Microbial pathogenesis.

[59]  Juan V. Escobar,et al.  Correlation between nanosecond X-ray flashes and stick–slip friction in peeling tape , 2008, Nature.

[60]  Cheng Xu,et al.  Raising the Working Temperature of a Triboelectric Nanogenerator by Quenching Down Electron Thermionic Emission in Contact‐Electrification , 2018, Advanced materials.

[61]  Zhong Lin Wang,et al.  Effects of Metal Work Function and Contact Potential Difference on Electron Thermionic Emission in Contact Electrification , 2019, Advanced Functional Materials.

[62]  Lieng-Huang Lee,et al.  Dual mechanism for metal-polymer contact electrification , 1994 .

[63]  Jinhui Nie,et al.  Power generation from the interaction of a liquid droplet and a liquid membrane , 2019, Nature Communications.

[64]  Chuncheng Chen,et al.  Br−/BrO−-mediated highly efficient photoelectrochemical epoxidation of alkenes on α-Fe2O3 , 2023, Nature Communications.

[65]  D. Meyer,et al.  Generation of hard X-ray radiation using the triboelectric effect by peeling adhesive tape , 2013 .

[66]  J. Lowell,et al.  Contact electrification-why is it variable? , 1988 .

[67]  Makov,et al.  Electronic properties of finite metallic systems. , 1993, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[68]  C. A. Rezende,et al.  Electric potential decay on polyethylene: Role of atmospheric water on electric charge build-up and dissipation , 2011 .

[69]  G.S.P. Castle,et al.  Contact charging between insulators , 1997 .

[70]  C. B. Duke,et al.  Contact electrification of polymers: A quantitative model , 1978 .

[71]  L. McCarty,et al.  Electrostatic charging due to separation of ions at interfaces: contact electrification of ionic electrets. , 2008, Angewandte Chemie.

[72]  Zhong Lin Wang,et al.  Electron Transfer in Nanoscale Contact Electrification: Photon Excitation Effect , 2019, Advanced materials.

[73]  Qing Zhang,et al.  Pumping electrons from chemical potential difference , 2018, Nano Energy.

[74]  T. Shao,et al.  Bipolar charge transfer induced by water: experimental and first-principles studies. , 2017, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[75]  Cheng Xu,et al.  Quantifying the triboelectric series , 2019, Nature Communications.

[76]  T. Shinbrot,et al.  Use of a static eliminator to improve powder flow. , 2009, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[77]  T. Shinbrot,et al.  Spontaneous tribocharging of similar materials , 2008 .

[78]  Charles Cooney,et al.  Effects of electrostatic charging on pharmaceutical powder blending homogeneity. , 2009, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.