Single Trial Variability of Event-Related Brain Potentials as an Index of Neural Efficiency During Working Memory

Event-related brain potentials ERPs to a particular stimulus are extracted from the continuous electroencephalogram EEG through signal averaging techniques. The most extensively studied ERP component, P300 P3, or P3b, occurs at approximately 300---800i¾?ms post-stimulus. P3 amplitude and latency are markers of the attentional/cognitive resources devoted to the task and the timing within msecs of central processing speed of an individual's cognitive response to a stimulus, respectively. Variability in the timing and amplitude of components in the single EEG trials that contribute to the averaged ERP has been of particular interest to our laboratory because it may provide an index of central information processing efficiency. Examination of single trial variability STV can provide a level of analysis beyond traditional ERP measures and offers a unique marker of the functional integrity of neural pathways. In the present study we examined ERP STV as it relates to WM demand or load during a visual n-back task in normal adult participants. Performance measures and the scalp-recorded EEG were obtained during the n-back task. Frontal and parietal scalp averaged ERPs were derived from the EEG time-locked to the stimuli. The mean and variability SD of the peak amplitude and latency were then obtained from the single trial data for each participant and condition. Results showed that as WM load increased, behavioral measures of processing speed slowed, behavioral efficiency decreased, and the number of correct responses decreased. Correlations for both latency and amplitude between the P3 component derived from the averaged ERP and the P3 component derived from the single trials were generally high, indicating that the P3s for individual trials identified by our STV procedure were representative of the P3s in the averaged ERP obtained by standard signal averaging procedures.P3 STV analyses also showed differential effects between frontal and parietal scalp sites for both amplitude and latency variability that were related to WM load. Both frontal P3 latency STV and amplitude increased as WM load increased, indicating decreased neural efficiency associated with an increase in WM load. Single trial ERP variability measures may provide potential physiological markers of the neural efficiency of brain processes engaged in cognitive functions, such as working memory.

[1]  S. MacDonald,et al.  Intraindividual variability in reaction time predicts cognitive outcomes 5 years later. , 2010, Neuropsychology.

[2]  A. Baddeley.  Working memory: looking back and looking forward , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[3]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Temporal dynamics of brain activation during a working memory task , 1997, Nature.

[4]  Peter N. C. Mohr,et al.  Variability in Brain Activity as an Individual Difference Measure in Neuroscience? , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  A Gevins,et al.  Dynamic cortical networks of verbal and spatial working memory: effects of memory load and task practice. , 1998, Cerebral cortex.

[6]  S. Segalowitz,et al.  Sources of P300 attenuation after head injury: single-trial amplitude, latency jitter, and EEG power. , 1995, Psychophysiology.

[7]  Sidney J. Segalowitz,et al.  Task complexity and habituation effects on frontal P300 topography , 2001, Brain and Cognition.

[8]  J. Polich.  Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[9]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  Dissecting Contributions of Prefrontal Cortex and Fusiform Face Area to Face Working Memory , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[10]  David W. Shucard,et al.  Stage and load effects on ERP topography during verbal and spatial working memory , 2009, Brain Research.

[11]  Susan E. Gathercole,et al.  Neuropsychology and working memory: A review. , 1994 .

[12]  A. Kok.  On the utility of P3 amplitude as a measure of processing capacity. , 2001, Psychophysiology.

[13]  D. Shucard,et al.  Single-trial latency variability does not contribute to fast habituation of the long-latency averaged auditory evoked potential in the albino rat. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[14]  G. Geffen,et al.  The n-back as a dual-task: P300 morphology under divided attention. , 2001, Psychophysiology.

[15]  J. Shucard,et al.  The relationship between processing speed and working memory demand in systemic lupus erythematosus: evidence from a visual n-back task. , 2011, Neuropsychology.

[16]  S. Carlson,et al.  Distribution of cortical activation during visuospatial n-back tasks as revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 1998, Cerebral cortex.

[17]  D. Shucard,et al.  Single-trial latency variability of auditory evoked potentials may indicate immediate memory in the albino rat. , 2003, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[18]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  From single-trial EEG to brain area dynamics , 2002, Neurocomputing.