Supply Chain Integration, Product Modularity, and Market Valuation: Evidence from the Solar Energy Industry

Supply chain integration is increasingly seen as a method to obtain flexibility and, consequently, to provide competitive advantage for firms within a supply chain. Product modularity, either in concert with or independent of such integration, can also produce flexibility for firms within a supply chain. In this proof-of-concept research, we explore whether the supply chain network affects each constituent firm's market valuation and how decisions regarding the level of supply chain integration and the usage of product modularity are associated with the value of the supply chain. We develop a method to identify and measure the supply chain's effect on each constituent firm's market valuation. Results indicate that greater integration is associated with a higher supply chain valuation, whereas increasing aggregated product modularity across the supply chain relates to a lower supply chain value. However, when combined, the interaction of aggregated product modularity and supply chain integration is positively associated with the supply chain's valuation.

[1]  S. Thomke,et al.  Agile Product Development: Managing Development Flexibility in Uncertain Environments , 1998 .

[2]  Steven B. Lyman,et al.  Supply chain management: a strategic perspective , 2002 .

[3]  M. Frohlich,et al.  Arcs of integration: an international study of supply chain strategies , 2001 .

[4]  Sean P. Willems,et al.  Optimizing Strategic Safety Stock Placement in Supply Chains , 2000, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[5]  Sean P. Willems,et al.  Accelerating the Profitability of Hewlett-Packard's Supply Chains , 2004, Interfaces.

[6]  Marshall L. Fisher,et al.  An Econometric Analysis of Inventory Turnover Performance in Retail Services , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[7]  R. Schmalensee.  Do Markets Differ Much , 1984 .

[8]  Charles H. Fine,et al.  Modeling tradeoffs in three-dimensional concurrent engineering: a goal programming approach , 2005 .

[9]  T. Davis.  Effective supply chain management , 2020, Strategic Direction.

[10]  Ron Sanchez,et al.  Modular Architectures in the Marketing Process , 1999 .

[11]  Stefan H. Thomke,et al.  Capturing the real value of innovation tools , 2006 .

[12]  R. Weber.  Basic Content Analysis , 1986 .

[13]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Technology Adoption in the Presence of Network Externalities , 1986, Journal of Political Economy.

[14]  Juliana Hsuan Mikkola.  Impacts of supplier-buyer relationships on modularization in new product development , 1999 .

[15]  Sebastian K. Fixson,et al.  Product architecture assessment: a tool to link product, process, and supply chain design decisions , 2005 .

[16]  Frits K. Pil,et al.  Modularity: Implications for Imitation, Innovation, and Sustained Advantage , 2006 .

[17]  Pietro Romano,et al.  Managing business processes across supply networks: the role of coordination mechanisms , 2004 .

[18]  K. B. Hendricks,et al.  An Empirical Analysis of the Effect of Supply Chain Disruptions on Long‐Run Stock Price Performance and Equity Risk of the Firm , 2005 .

[19]  B. Kogut,et al.  Operating flexibility, global manufacturing, and the option value of a multinational network , 1994 .

[20]  Thomas V. Scannell,et al.  Success Factors for Integrating Suppliers into New Product Development , 1997 .

[21]  T. Payne,et al.  What Is the Right Supply Chain For Your Products , 2004 .

[22]  D. Power.  Supply chain management integration and implementation: a literature review , 2005 .

[23]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage , 1998 .

[24]  R. Langlois.  The Vanishing Hand: The Changing Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism , 2001 .

[25]  Sean P. Willems,et al.  Supply Chain Design: Safety Stock Placement and Supply Chain Configuration , 2003, Supply Chain Management.

[26]  Paulo J. Gomes,et al.  Linking modularity with problem solving and coordination efforts , 2008 .

[27]  Francesco Zirpoli,et al.  Product architecture, inter-firm vertical coordination and knowledge partitioning in the auto industry , 2009 .

[28]  Kenneth F. Simpson.  In-Process Inventories , 1958 .

[29]  M. Porter.  The Structure Within Industries and Companies' Performance , 1979 .

[30]  David A. Collier,et al.  THE MEASUREMENT AND OPERATING BENEFITS OF COMPONENT PART COMMONALITY , 1981 .

[31]  Geoffrey G. Parker,et al.  Integration and Cospecialization of Emerging Complementary Technologies by Startups , 2012 .

[32]  Melissa A. Schilling,et al.  The Use of Modular Organizational Forms: An Industry-Level Analysis , 2001 .

[33]  Denis Royston Towill,et al.  Integrating the automotive supply chain: where are we now? , 2002 .

[34]  Dovev Lavie.  Alliance Portfolios and Firm Performance: A Study of Value Creation and Appropriation in the U.S. Software Industry , 2007 .

[35]  Mary J. Benner.  Securities Analysts and Incumbent Response to Radical Technological Change: Evidence from Digital Photography and Internet Telephony , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[36]  Arnaldo Camuffo,et al.  Beyond the "Mirroring" Hypothesis: Product Modularity and Interorganizational Relations in the Air Conditioning Industry , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[37]  Russell J. Lundholm,et al.  CROSS- SECTIONAL DETERMINANTS OF ANALYST RATINGS OF CORPORATE DISCLOSURES , 1993 .

[38]  Brent R. Moulton.  An Illustration of a Pitfall in Estimating the Effects of Aggregate Variables on Micro Unit , 1990 .

[39]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm , 2011 .

[40]  Volodymyr Babich,et al.  Pre-IPO Operational and Financial Decisions , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[41]  Benita M. Beamon,et al.  Measuring supply chain performance , 1999 .

[42]  Yoram Wind,et al.  Competing in a Flat World: Building Enterprises for a Borderless World , 2007 .

[43]  Charles H. Fine.  CLOCKSPEED‐BASED STRATEGIES FOR SUPPLY CHAIN DESIGN1 , 2009 .

[44]  Jeffrey K. Liker,et al.  Modularity as a Strategy for Supply Chain Coordination: The Case of U.S. Auto , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[45]  Geoffrey G. Parker,et al.  Two-Sided Network Effects: A Theory of Information Product Design , 2010, Manag. Sci..

[46]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  Special Issue on Design and Development: Sourcing By Design: Product Complexity and the Supply Chain , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[47]  John B. Houlihan.  International supply chain management , 1985 .

[48]  M. Lévesque,et al.  A comparison of revenue growth at recent-IPO and established firms: The influence of SG&A, R&D and COGS , 2012 .

[49]  Thomas Y. Choi,et al.  Supplier–supplier relationships in the buyer–supplier triad: Building theories from eight case studies , 2005 .

[50]  S. Lazzarini,et al.  Integrating supply chain and network analyses: The study of netchains , 2001 .

[51]  David J. Miller,et al.  The Resource-Based View of the Firm in Two Environments: The Hollywood Film Studios From 1936 to 1965 , 1996 .

[52]  R. V. Hoek.  Clockspeed: Winning Industry Control in the Age of Temporary Advantage , 2000 .

[53]  G. Stevens.  Integrating the Supply Chain , 1989 .

[54]  Matthias Holweg,et al.  Linking Product Variety to Order-Fulfillment Strategies , 2004, Interfaces.

[55]  M. Christopher,et al.  Supply Chain Strategy: Its Impact on Shareholder Value , 1999 .

[56]  Hau L. Lee.  Managing supply chain inventory: Pitfalls and opportunities , 1992 .

[57]  Carliss Y. Baldwin,et al.  Where do transactions come from? Modularity, transactions, and the boundaries of firms , 2007 .

[58]  C Antoine,et al.  Managing in an age of modularity , 2013 .

[59]  Akira Takeishi,et al.  Modularization in the Auto Industry: Interlinked Multiple Hierarchies of Product, Production, and Supplier Systems , 2001 .

[60]  S. Vickery,et al.  Supply Chain Flexibility: An Empirical Study , 1999 .

[61]  C. Harland.  Supply Chain Management: Relationships, Chains and Networks , 1996 .

[62]  B. J. Pine,et al.  Making mass customization work , 1993 .

[63]  M. Stevenson,et al.  Flexibility from a supply chain perspective: definition and review , 2007 .

[64]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Architectural Innovation and Modular Corporate Forms , 2001 .

[65]  HERBERT A. SIMON,et al.  The Architecture of Complexity , 1991 .

[66]  Antonio K. W. Lau,et al.  Supply chain product co-development, product modularity and product performance: Empirical evidence from Hong Kong manufacturers , 2007, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[67]  Geoffrey G. Parker,et al.  FROM BUYER TO INTEGRATOR: THE TRANSFORMATION OF THE SUPPLY‐CHAIN MANAGER IN THE VERTICALLY DISINTEGRATING FIRM , 2002 .

[68]  Arnd Huchzermeier,et al.  Valuing Operational Flexibility Under Exchange Rate Risk , 1996, Oper. Res..

[69]  M. Porter.  Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance , 1985 .

[70]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Component Sharing in the Management of Product Variety: a Study of Automotive Braking Systems , 1999 .

[71]  F. Salvadora,et al.  Modularity , product variety , production volume , and component sourcing : theorizing beyond generic prescriptions , 2002 .

[72]  Anand Swaminathan,et al.  Modularity and the Impact of Buyer - Supplier Relationships on the Survival of Suppliers , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[73]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  The Misalignment of Product Architecture and Organizational Structure in Complex Product Development , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[74]  S. Brusoni,et al.  Unpacking the Black Box of Modularity: Technologies, Products and Organizations , 2001 .

[75]  William H. Sackley.  The Operating Performance of Firms Conducting Seasoned Equity Offerings , 1998 .

[76]  Avi Fiegenbaum,et al.  Output flexibility—A competitive advantage for small firms , 1991 .

[77]  R. Langlois,et al.  Networks and innovation in a modular system: Lessons from the microcomputer and stereo component industries , 1992 .

[78]  Cornelia Dröge,et al.  The effects of product modularity on competitive performance: Do integration strategies mediate the relationship? , 2007 .

[79]  S. Parker.  Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities , 1970 .

[80]  Michael H. Kutner.  Applied Linear Statistical Models , 1974 .

[81]  Arnaldo Camuffo,et al.  Risk sharing in supplier relations: an agency model for the Italian air-conditioning industry , 2007 .

[82]  Brian Squire,et al.  Modularization and the impact on supply relationships , 2007 .

[83]  L. Trigeorgis,et al.  The General Flexibility to Switch: Real Options Revisited , 2000 .

[84]  K. B. Hendricks,et al.  Delays in new product introductions and the market value of the firm: the consequences of being late to the market , 1997 .

[85]  Jan Venselaar,et al.  DESIGN RULES , 1999 .

[86]  Melissa A. Schilling.  Toward a General Modular Systems Theory and Its Application to Interfirm Product Modularity , 2000 .

[87]  Cynthia A. Montgomery,et al.  Tobin's q and the Importance of Focus in Firm Performance , 1988 .

[88]  Richard C.M. Yam,et al.  Supply chain integration and product modularity: An empirical study of product performance for selected Hong Kong manufacturing industries , 2010 .

[89]  Ron Sanchez,et al.  Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design , 1996 .

[90]  A. Zellner.  An Efficient Method of Estimating Seemingly Unrelated Regressions and Tests for Aggregation Bias , 1962 .