Coding of Electrical Stimulation Patterns for Binaural Sound Coding Strategies for Cochlear Implants

Binaural sound coding strategies can improve speech intelligibility for cochlear implant (CI) users. These require a signal transmission between two CIs. As power consumption needs to be kept low in CIs, efficient coding or bit-rate reduction of the signals is necessary. In this work, it is proposed to code the electrical signals or excitation patterns (EP) of the CI instead of the audio signals captured by the microphones. For this purpose we designed a differential pulse code modulation based codec with zero algorithmic delay to code the EP of the advanced combination encoder (ACE) sound coding strategy for CIs. Our EP codec was compared to the G.722 64 kbit/s audio codec using the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) as objective measure of quality. On two audio-sets the mean SNR was 0.5 to 13.9 dB higher when coding the EP with the proposed coding method while achieving a mean bit-rate between 34.1 and 40.3 kbit/s.

[1]  Jörn Ostermann,et al.  Automatic speech recognition with a cochlear implant front-end , 2007, INTERSPEECH.

[2]  Gregg J Suaning,et al.  An Evaluation of Output Signal to Noise Ratio as a Predictor of Cochlear Implant Speech Intelligibility , 2018, Ear and hearing.

[3]  Jörn Ostermann,et al.  Error robust low delay audio coding using spherical logarithmic quantization , 2016, 2016 24th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO).

[4]  Marc Moonen,et al.  Understanding the effect of noise on electrical stimulation sequences in cochlear implants and its impact on speech intelligibility , 2013, Hearing Research.

[5]  Mario A. Svirsky,et al.  Speech Perception Benefits of Sequential Bilateral Cochlear Implantation in Children and Adults: A Retrospective Analysis , 2008, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[6]  I. Hochmair-Desoyer,et al.  The HSM sentence test as a tool for evaluating the speech understanding in noise of cochlear implant users. , 1997, The American journal of otology.

[7]  W Nogueira,et al.  Artificial speech bandwidth extension improves telephone speech intelligibility and quality in cochlear implant users. , 2019, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  R. Tyler,et al.  Speech perception, localization, and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implants. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  G. Box,et al.  Distribution of Residual Autocorrelations in Autoregressive-Integrated Moving Average Time Series Models , 1970 .

[10]  Enrique A. Lopez-Poveda,et al.  A Binaural Cochlear Implant Sound Coding Strategy Inspired by the Contralateral Medial Olivocochlear Reflex , 2015, Ear and hearing.

[11]  C. Shannon,et al.  Communication In The Presence Of Noise , 1998, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[12]  Rachel A McArdle,et al.  An Evaluation of the BKB-SIN, HINT, QuickSIN, and WIN Materials on Listeners With Normal Hearing and Listeners With Hearing Loss. , 2007, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[13]  A. Spanias,et al.  Perceptual coding of digital audio , 2000, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[14]  Alexandra Kaider,et al.  Fixed and adaptive beamforming improves speech perception in noise in cochlear implant recipients equipped with the MED-EL SONNET audio processor , 2018, PloS one.

[15]  René H. Gifford,et al.  Speech Recognition Materials and Ceiling Effects: Considerations for Cochlear Implant Programs , 2008, Audiology and Neurotology.

[16]  Chen Hu,et al.  Re-engineering ITU-T G.722: Low delay and complexity superwideband coding at 64 kbit/s with G.722 bitstream watermarking , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP).

[17]  Waldo Nogueira,et al.  A Synchronized Binaural N-of-M Sound Coding Strategy for Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users , 2018, ITG Symposium on Speech Communication.

[18]  A. Büchner,et al.  Spectral contrast enhancement improves speech intelligibility in noise for cochlear implants. , 2016, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  Dan Gnansia,et al.  The Voice Track multiband single-channel modified Wiener-filter noise reduction system for cochlear implants: patients' outcomes and subjective appraisal , 2016, International journal of audiology.

[20]  Lynne Outhred,et al.  An evaluation of the , 2001 .

[21]  P. P. Vaidyanathan,et al.  The Theory of Linear Prediction , 2008, Synthesis Lectures on Signal Processing.

[22]  Thomas Lenarz,et al.  A Psychoacoustic "NofM"-Type Speech Coding Strategy for Cochlear Implants , 2005, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[23]  S D Stephens,et al.  The use of qualitative questionnaires in patients having and being considered for cochlear implants. , 1997, Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences.