The effect of outcome and process accountability on customer–supplier negotiations

Abstract Prior studies on customer–supplier negotiations ( Drake and Haka, 2008 , Van den Abbeele et al., 2009 ) find that negotiators who have access to relevant activity-based cost information are not always able to use this information to improve joint outcomes. Our study extends this literature by examining how the type of accountability (process and outcome accountability) influences the extent to which negotiators can obtain lower joint costs. We hypothesize and test a model that predicts that the type of accountability affects negotiated outcomes through its effect on negotiators’ fixed-pie bias revisions and the negotiation tactics they employ during customer-supplier negotiations. Results from an experiment show that negotiators held accountable for their negotiation processes are better able to reduce their fixed-pie biases and achieve lower joint costs compared to those who are held accountable for their negotiation outcomes. Using rich data based on taped negotiations, we demonstrate that the effect of accountability on joint costs is indirect through its effect on negotiators’ choice of negotiation tactics and the extent to which negotiators can reduce their fixed-pie biases.

[1]  O’Connor,et al.  Groups and Solos in Context: The Effects of Accountability on Team Negotiation. , 1997, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[2]  K. Trotman,et al.  Audit Review: Managers' Interpersonal Expectations and Conduct of The Review , 2001 .

[3]  Mary D Brtek,et al.  Effects of procedure and outcome accountability on interview validity. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[4]  Steven D. Seilheimer,et al.  Looking and Competing: Accountability and Visual Access in Integrative Bargaining , 1981 .

[5]  P. Carnevale,et al.  Motivational Bases Of Information Processing and Strategy in Conflict and Negotiation , 2003 .

[6]  Kathryn Kadous,et al.  The Efficacy of Third-Party Consultation in Preventing Managerial Escalation of Commitment: The Role of Mental Representations Discussion of "The Efficacy of Third-Party Consultation in Preventing Managerial Escalation of Commitment: The Role , 2004 .

[7]  Vicky B. Hoffman,et al.  Accountability, the dilution effect, and conservatism in auditors' fraud judgments , 1997 .

[8]  John G. Lynch,et al.  Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and Truths about Mediation Analysis , 2010 .

[9]  Jane Kennedy,et al.  Debiasing Audit Judgment With Accountability - A Framework And Experimental Results , 1993 .

[10]  W AndersonShannon,et al.  Management Control for Market Transactions , 2005 .

[11]  Sally Wright,et al.  Auditor Negotiations: An Examination of the Efficacy of Intervention Methods , 2005 .

[12]  Davide Pietroni,et al.  Emotions as strategic information: Effects of other’s emotional expressions on fixed-pie perception, demands, and integrative behavior in negotiation , 2008 .

[13]  Sarah E. Bonner.  Judgment and Decision Making in Accounting , 2007 .

[14]  Alexandra Van den Abbeele,et al.  The effect of cost information on buyer–supplier negotiations in different power settings , 2009 .

[15]  Steven J. Kachelmeier,et al.  Negotiated Transfer Pricing: Is Fairness Easier Said than Done? , 2002 .

[16]  Arnold M. Wright,et al.  A Note on the Interdependence between Hypothesis Generation and Information Search in Conducting Analytical Procedures , 2003 .

[17]  R. Kaplan,et al.  Time-driven activity-based costing. , 2003, Harvard business review.

[18]  Nir Halevy,et al.  Mind games: the mental representation of conflict. , 2012, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  Kathleen M. O'Connor,et al.  Tough guys finish last: the perils of a distributive reputation ☆ , 2002 .

[20]  Kathryn Kadous,et al.  The Efficacy of Third-Party Consultation in Preventing Managerial Escalation of Commitment: The Role of Mental Representations , 2003 .

[21]  R. Hastie,et al.  Social perception in negotiation , 1990 .

[22]  C. D. De Dreu,et al.  Motivated information processing, strategic choice, and the quality of negotiated agreement. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[23]  C. D. De Dreu,et al.  Unfixing the fixed pie: a motivated information-processing approach to integrative negotiation. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[24]  Mark E. Peecher.  The Influence of Auditors' Justification Processes on Their Decisions: A Cognitive Model and Experimental Evidence , 1996 .

[25]  Jacob Cohen.  A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[26]  Michael J. Prietula,et al.  Getting to best: efficiency versus optimality in negotiation , 2000, Cogn. Sci..

[27]  Finn Wynstra,et al.  Total Cost of Ownership in the Services Sector: A Case Study , 2006 .

[28]  Itamar Simonson,et al.  Deescalation Strategies: A Comparison of Techniques for Reducing Commitment to Losing Courses of Action , 1992 .

[29]  Wynne W. Chin.  Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling by , 2009 .

[30]  Kenneth A. Merchant,et al.  A review of the literature on control and accountability , 2006 .

[31]  P. Tetlock,et al.  Accounting for the effects of accountability. , 1999, Psychological bulletin.

[32]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  Motivated closing of the mind: "seizing" and "freezing". , 1996, Psychological review.

[33]  Ethan R. Burris,et al.  Negotiator confidence: The impact of self-efficacy on tactics and outcomes , 2006 .

[34]  Shannon W. Anderson,et al.  Strategic Cost Management in Supply Chains, Part 2: Executional Cost Management , 2009 .

[35]  M. W. Nelson,et al.  Judgment and Decision Making Research in Auditing: A Task, Person, and Interpersonal Interaction Perspective , 2005 .

[36]  Steven M. Glover.  The influence of time pressure and accountability on auditors' processing of nondiagnostic information , 1997 .

[37]  A. Kruglanski.  The Psychology of Being "Right": The Problem of Accuracy in Social Perception and Cognition , 1989 .

[38]  C. Dreu.  Time pressure and closing of the mind in negotiation , 2003 .

[39]  Leigh Thompson,et al.  LOSE-LOSE AGREEMENTS IN INTERDEPENDENT DECISION MAKING , 1996 .

[40]  Shannon W. Anderson,et al.  Management Control for Market Transactions: The Relation Between Transaction Characteristics, Incomplete Contract Design, and Subsequent Performance , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[41]  Steven E. Salterio,et al.  The Balanced Scorecard: The Effects of Assurance and Process Accountability on Managerial Judgment , 2004 .

[42]  Regine Slagmulder,et al.  Tax-Compliant Transfer Pricing and Responsibility Accounting , 2009 .

[43]  Hun-Tong Tan,et al.  Effects Of Expectations, Prior Involvement, And Review Awareness On Memory For Audit Evidence And Judgment , 1995 .

[44]  Hun-Tong Tan,et al.  Accountability Effects on Auditors' Performance: Influence of Knowledge, Problem-Solving Ability, and Task Complexity , 1999 .

[45]  Michael J. Prietula,et al.  Knowledge Matters: The Effect of Tactical Descriptions on Negotiation Behavior and Outcome , 1996 .

[46]  S. Anderson,et al.  Strategic Cost Management in Supply Chains, Part 1: Structural Cost Management , 2009 .

[47]  M. Bazerman.  Judgment in Managerial Decision Making , 1990 .

[48]  Ken T. Trotman,et al.  The effect of framing and negotiation partner's objective on judgments about negotiated transfer prices , 2008 .

[49]  Philip L. Smith,et al.  The process of negotiating: Strategy and timing as predictors of outcomes. , 1996 .

[50]  Henri C. Dekker,et al.  Value Chain Analysis in Interfirm Relationships: A Field Study. , 2003 .

[51]  Susan F. Haka,et al.  Does ABC Information Exacerbate Hold‐Up Problems in Buyer‐Supplier Negotiations? , 2008 .

[52]  J. Frank Yates,et al.  Effects of procedural and outcome accountability on judgment quality , 1996 .

[53]  Thomas Ahrens,et al.  Styles of Accountability , 1996 .

[54]  Terri L. Griffith,et al.  "Fixed Pie" a la Mode: Information Availability, Information Processing, and the Negotiation of Suboptimal Agreements , 1995 .

[55]  Stijn Masschelein,et al.  ABC Information, Fairness Perceptions, and Interfirm Negotiations , 2012 .

[56]  Clinton Free.  Supply‐Chain Accounting Practices in the UK Retail Sector: Enabling or Coercing Collaboration?* , 2007 .

[57]  Optimized sourcing strategies using total cost of ownership: the Vatman-case at 3M , 2003 .

[58]  Jacob G. Birnberg,et al.  Effects of organizational process change on responsibility accounting and managers' revelations of private knowledge , 2008 .

[59]  Eve D. Rosenzweig.  A contingent view of e-collaboration and performance in manufacturing , 2009 .

[60]  M. Gelfand,et al.  Individualism-collectivism and accountability in intergroup negotiations. , 1999 .

[61]  W. Reinartz,et al.  Balancing Acquisition and Retention Resources to Maximize Customer Profitability , 2005 .

[62]  John Roberts.  The possibilities of accountability , 1991 .

[63]  G. Marchant,et al.  Justification Of Decisions In Auditing , 1995 .

[64]  Mark H. Taylor,et al.  Accountability and auditors' materiality judgments: The effects of differential pressure strength on conservatism, variability, and effort , 2006 .