A Novel Approach for Computing Quality Map of Visual Information Fidelity Index

The visual information fidelity (VIF) index gained widespread popularity as a tool to assess the quality of images and to evaluate the performance of image processing algorithms and systems. But VIF is not a map-based quality metric if its quality map is calculated by traditional sliding window approach. This map-based property is owned by the other quality metrics such as structural similarity (SSIM) and mean-squared error (MSE). In this article, we first construct a novel VIF quality map in pixel domain, which makes VIF become a Minkowski norm of its quality map. Furthermore, we deduce the gradient of VIF by taking the derivative of VIF index with respect to the reference image. The gradient of VIF is easy to calculate and has many useful applications. Experimental results show that the proposed quality map can provide useful guidance on how local image quality is similar to reference image.

[1]  Edward R. Vrscay,et al.  SSIM-inspired image restoration using sparse representation , 2012, EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing.

[2]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Unifying analysis of full reference image quality assessment , 2008, 2008 15th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[3]  Guy Wallis,et al.  The prototype effect revisited: Evidence for an abstract feature model of face recognition. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[4]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  A Statistical Evaluation of Recent Full Reference Image Quality Assessment Algorithms , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[5]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Image quality assessment using natural scene statistics , 2004 .

[6]  Gustavo de Veciana,et al.  An information fidelity criterion for image quality assessment using natural scene statistics , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[7]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Mean squared error: Love it or leave it? A new look at Signal Fidelity Measures , 2009, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[8]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[9]  Qiang Li Objective image and video quality assessment with applications , 2009 .

[10]  Stéphane Coulombe,et al.  Low-complexity computation of visual information fidelity in the discrete wavelet domain , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing.

[11]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  New vistas in image and video quality assessment , 2007, Electronic Imaging.

[12]  Stéphane Coulombe,et al.  A novel discrete wavelet transform framework for full reference image quality assessment , 2013, Signal Image Video Process..

[13]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Stimulus synthesis for efficient evaluation and refinement of perceptual image quality metrics , 2004, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[14]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Maximum differentiation (MAD) competition: a methodology for comparing computational models of perceptual quantities. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[15]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Image information and visual quality , 2006, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[16]  Alireza Nasiri Avanaki,et al.  Exact global histogram specification optimized for structural similarity , 2008, 0901.0065.