Antecedents of innovative performance: Findings from PLS-SEM and fuzzy sets (fsQCA)

Abstract Collaboration for innovation and innovative performance have been documented as critical competitive advantage tools for firms in emerging markets. Drawing on the “transactive memory” theory, this paper proposes that organizational learning (OL) and inter-organizational communication (IOC) can positively impact innovative performance through the mediating role of collaboration for innovation. The proposed relationships were assessed by PLS-SEM (symmetric) and fuzzy sets (asymmetric) approaches using two independent survey datasets, which were obtained from firms operating in the telecommunications and IT industries in Turkey. Results from PLS-SEM revealed that higher levels of OL and IOC increased collaboration for innovation, while collaboration not only improved innovative performance but also mediated the impacts of OL and IOC on innovative performance. Results from fuzzy sets (fsQCA) reinforced the symmetric findings, fsQCA revealed that causal conditions OL and collaboration for innovation, IOC and collaboration for innovation were necessary and sufficient recipes for higher levels of innovative performance.

[1]  Oliver Gassmann,et al.  Opening Up the Innovation Process: Towards an Agenda , 2006 .

[2]  Markku Jokisaari,et al.  Joint effects of social networks and information giving on innovative performance after organizational entry , 2014 .

[3]  J. Scott Armstrong,et al.  How to avoid exploratory research , 2005 .

[4]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  Editorial - Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling: Rigorous Applications, Better Results and Higher Acceptance , 2013 .

[5]  M. P. Salmador,et al.  The role of social capital in today's economy , 2004 .

[6]  A. Mohammed Abubakar,et al.  Applying artificial intelligence technique to predict knowledge hiding behavior , 2019, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[7]  H. Gemünden,et al.  Opening Up for Competitive Advantage – How Deutsche Telekom Creates an Open Innovation Ecosystem , 2009 .

[8]  Anne L. J. Ter Wal,et al.  Knowledge Networks and Innovative Performance in an Industrial District: The Case of a Footwear District in the South of Italy , 2007 .

[9]  J. West,et al.  Leveraging External Sources of Innovation: A Review of Research on Open Innovation , 2013 .

[10]  Jing Zhang,et al.  Exploring stakeholders' expectations of the benefits and barriers of e-government knowledge sharing , 2005, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[11]  Vesa Peltokorpi Transactive Memory System Coordination Mechanisms in Organizations , 2014 .

[12]  Roderick E. White,et al.  An Organizational Learning Framework : From Intuition to Institution Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[13]  Wenyu Dou,et al.  The effects of firm capabilities on external collaboration and performance: The moderating role of market turbulence , 2015 .

[14]  Alistair Brandon-Jones,et al.  From sustainability commitment to performance:The role of intra- and inter- firm collaborative capabilities in the upstream supply chain , 2015 .

[15]  Linda Argote,et al.  An Opportunity for Mutual Learning between Organizational Learning and Global Strategy Researchers: Transactive Memory Systems , 2015 .

[16]  C. Soosay,et al.  Supply chain collaboration : capabilities for continuous innovation , 2008 .

[17]  M. Jaén,et al.  Collaboration mechanisms for sustainable innovation , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[18]  D. Jiménez-Jiménez,et al.  Innovation, organizational learning, and performance , 2011 .

[19]  Yuqing Ren,et al.  Transactive Memory Systems , 2012 .

[20]  Jane E. Klobas,et al.  Transactive memory systems in organizations: Implications for knowledge directories , 2008, Decis. Support Syst..

[21]  Dae Ryun Chang,et al.  Organizational memory influences new product success , 2008 .

[22]  D. Ribeiro-Soriano,et al.  Entrepreneurship and risk-taking in a post-disaster scenario , 2020, International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal.

[23]  Young-Choon Kim,et al.  Professional collaboration in technological innovation: a case of technology licensing of university inventions , 2018, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[24]  B. Looy,et al.  Interorganizational collaboration and innovation: Toward a portfolio approach , 2005 .

[25]  Spyros Lioukas,et al.  Radical Product Innovations in Smes: The Dominance of Entrepreneurial Orientation , 2003 .

[26]  Jan Olhager,et al.  Supply chain integration and performance: The effects of long-term relationships, information technology and sharing, and logistics integration , 2012 .

[27]  Philip Powell,et al.  Managing inter-organizational knowledge sharing , 2016, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[28]  M. Meeus,et al.  Firm behaviour and innovative performance: An empirical exploration of the selection–adaptation debate , 2000 .

[29]  Sven C. Voelpel,et al.  Strategic Management as Organizational Learning: Developing Fit and Alignment through a Disciplined Process , 2005 .

[30]  Benyamin B. Lichtenstein,et al.  The Role of Organizational Learning in the Opportunity–Recognition Process , 2005 .

[31]  Kyle Lewis,et al.  Transactive Memory Systems: Current Issues and Future Research Directions , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[32]  Arch G. Woodside,et al.  Visualizing⋅Matching⋅Generalizing: Case Identification Hypotheses and Case-Level Data Analysis , 2015 .

[33]  J. Hagedoorn,et al.  Measuring innovative performance: is there an advantage in using multiple indicators? , 2003 .

[34]  Patrick Mikalef,et al.  Explaining travellers online information satisfaction: A complexity theory approach on information needs, barriers, sources and personal characteristics , 2017, Inf. Manag..

[35]  P. Naudé,et al.  How collaborative innovation networks affect new product performance: Product innovation capability, process innovation capability, and absorptive capacity , 2018, Industrial Marketing Management.

[36]  I. Miles,et al.  Innovation collaboration and appropriability by knowledge-intensive business services firms , 2016 .

[37]  C. Fombrun,et al.  Social Network Analysis For Organizations , 1979 .

[38]  Daniel G. Bachrach,et al.  A relational perspective of the microfoundations of dynamic managerial capabilities and transactive memory systems , 2018, Industrial Marketing Management.

[39]  Xu Jiang,et al.  An empirical investigation of knowledge management and innovative performance: The case of alliances , 2009 .

[40]  Michail N. Giannakos,et al.  The interplay of online shopping motivations and experiential factors on personalized e-commerce: A complexity theory approach , 2017, Telematics Informatics.

[41]  Arch G. Woodside,et al.  Applying complexity theory to deepen service dominant logic: Configural analysis of customer experience-and-outcome assessments of professional services for personal transformations , 2014 .

[42]  A. Salter,et al.  Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms , 2006 .

[43]  W. Vanhaverbeke,et al.  Open innovation practices in SMEs and large enterprises , 2011 .

[44]  D. Wegner,et al.  Cognitive interdependence in close relationships , 1985 .

[45]  Jakki J. Mohr,et al.  Communication Strategies in Marketing Channels: A Theoretical Perspective , 1990 .

[46]  Frank W. Dewhurst,et al.  Linking organizational learning and customer capital through an ambidexterity context: an empirical investigation in SMEs1 , 2007 .

[47]  H. Chesbrough The Future of Open Innovation , 2017 .

[48]  Nuria E. Hurtado-Torres,et al.  How does R&D internationalization in multinational firms affect their innovative performance? The moderating role of international collaboration in the energy industry , 2017, International Business Review.

[49]  K. Kilic,et al.  Organizational Support for Intrapreneurship and its Interaction with Human Capital To Enhance Innovative Performance , 2010 .

[50]  A. Woodside Moving beyond multiple regression analysis to algorithms: Calling for adoption of a paradigm shift from symmetric to asymmetric thinking in data analysis and crafting theory , 2013 .

[51]  Kenneth R. Evans,et al.  Strategic Collaborative Communication by Key Account Representatives , 2002 .

[52]  Heeseok Lee,et al.  The Impact of Information Technology and Transactive Memory Systems on Knowledge Sharing, Application, and Team Performance: A Field Study , 2010, MIS Q..

[53]  Joel West,et al.  Open at Birth? Why New Firms Do (or Don’t) Use Open Innovation , 2016 .

[54]  Charles C. Ragin,et al.  Set Relations in Social Research: Evaluating Their Consistency and Coverage , 2006, Political Analysis.

[55]  Juan Antonio Trespalacios Gutiérrez,et al.  Organisational learning and value creation in business markets , 2010 .

[56]  Abdullah Abdulaziz Al-Tameem,et al.  An Inhibiting Context Hampering Role of Information Technology as an Enabler in Organizational Learning , 2004, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[57]  Joanne E. Oxley,et al.  The Scope and Governance of International R&D Alliances , 2003 .

[58]  James A. Narus,et al.  A Model of Distributor Firm and Manufacturer Firm Working Partnerships , 1990 .

[59]  Hossein G.T. Olya,et al.  Asymmetric modeling of intention to purchase tourism weather insurance and loyalty , 2016 .

[60]  H. Gardner,et al.  Knowledge-Based Innovation: Emergence and Embedding of New Practice Areas in Management Consulting Firms , 2007 .

[61]  L. Argote,et al.  Organizational Learning and Management of Technology , 2017 .

[62]  G. Huber Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures , 1991 .

[63]  Peer C. Fiss Building Better Causal Theories: A Fuzzy Set Approach to Typologies in Organization Research , 2011 .

[64]  Augustine A. Lado,et al.  Inter‐organizational communication as a relational competency: Antecedents and performance outcomes in collaborative buyer–supplier relationships , 2008 .

[65]  Vesa Peltokorpi,et al.  Organizational transactive memory systems : Review and extension , 2012 .

[66]  Alberto Ferraris,et al.  How SMEs Engage in Open Innovation: a Survey , 2018 .

[67]  J. Hagedoorn,et al.  Mergers and acquisitions : their effect on the innovative performance of companies in high-tech industries , 2006 .

[68]  H. Chesbrough The Future of Open Innovation , 2010 .

[69]  William J. Kettinger,et al.  Effect of internal cost management, information systems integration, and absorptive capacity on inter-organizational cost management in supply chains☆ , 2012 .

[70]  P. Beneito The innovative performance of in-house and contracted R&D in terms of patents and utility models , 2006 .

[71]  H. Chesbrough Open Innovation: Where We've Been and Where We're Going , 2012 .

[72]  Ilkka Kauranen,et al.  A comprehensive review of open innovation literature , 2016 .

[73]  Sang M. Lee,et al.  Co‐innovation: convergenomics, collaboration, and co‐creation for organizational values , 2012 .

[74]  David F. Larcker,et al.  Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics: , 1981 .

[75]  LekakosGeorge,et al.  The interplay of online shopping motivations and experiential factors on personalized e-commerce , 2017 .

[76]  Marcel Bogers,et al.  Open innovation: current status and research opportunities , 2016 .

[77]  D. Wegner Transactive Memory: A Contemporary Analysis of the Group Mind , 1987 .

[78]  Frans van den Bosch,et al.  Interorganizational collaboration and firm innovativeness: Unpacking the role of the organizational environment , 2016 .

[79]  Linda Argote,et al.  First, get your feet wet: The effects of learning from direct and indirect experience on team creativity , 2010 .

[80]  Einar Rasmussen,et al.  The interplay of cognitive and relational social capital dimensions in university-industry collaboration: Overcoming the experience barrier , 2018, Research Policy.

[81]  D. Jiménez-Jiménez,et al.  The effect of organisational learning on interorganisational collaborations in innovation: an empirical study in SMEs , 2018, Knowledge Management Research & Practice.

[82]  Thomas Clauss,et al.  How businesses should govern knowledge-intensive collaborations with universities: An empirical investigation of university professors , 2017 .

[83]  Riitta Smeds,et al.  Process learning in alliances developing radical versus incremental innovations: evidence from the telecommunications industry , 2006 .

[84]  Ora-orn Poocharoen,et al.  Collaboration, Co-Production, Networks: Convergence of theories , 2014 .