Fracture Resistance of Laminate Veneers Made with Different Cutting and Preparation Techniques

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the fracture resistance of most used three preparation techniques applied laminate veneers made with three different restoration methods. Materials and Methods: 195 same sized maxillary central incisor teeth were grouped 10 different groups randomly. (testing groups n=20, control group n=15) Three different preparation techniques used for teeth preparation which were feather-edge, insical overlap and window. Laminate veneers were produced with three different methods that direct, indirect technique, and CAD/CAM milling. Control group was chosen from untreated teeth. Universal testing machine was used for fracture resistance test. Data were analyzed with two-ways ANOVA and Tukey LSD. Results: According to results, statistically differences were found between all groups.(p<0,05) Combination of insical overlap preparation and direct technique has higher fracture resistance values than other groups.(563,9 N). Conclusions: Preparation and restoration techniques are important for fracture resistance of laminate veneers.

[1]  B. Van Meerbeek,et al.  Curing mode affects bond strength of adhesively luted composite CAD/CAM restorations to dentin. , 2014, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[2]  Sérgio Siqueira,et al.  Ultimate ceramic veneer: a laboratory-guided preparation technique for minimally invasive laminate veneers. , 2012, Journal of the California Dental Association.

[3]  Perng-Ru Liu,et al.  Fracture resistance and marginal discrepancy of porcelain laminate veneers influenced by preparation design and restorative material in vitro. , 2012, Journal of dentistry.

[4]  P. Vult von Steyern,et al.  The influence of support properties and complexity on fracture strength and fracture mode of all-ceramic fixed dental prostheses , 2011, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[5]  Anjali Kaiwar,et al.  Survival rates of porcelain laminate restoration based on different incisal preparation designs: An analysis , 2011, Journal of conservative dentistry : JCD.

[6]  A. Benetti,et al.  The clinical microscope and direct composite veneer. , 2010, Operative dentistry.

[7]  J. D. Brewer,et al.  Effect of two connector designs on the fracture resistance of all-ceramic core materials for fixed dental prostheses. , 2009, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[8]  P. Vallittu,et al.  Effect of intermediate fiber layer on the fracture load and failure mode of maxillary incisors restored with laminate veneers. , 2008, Dental materials journal.

[9]  C. Soares,et al.  In vitro analysis of the radiodensity of indirect composites and ceramic inlay systems and its influence on the detection of cement overhangs , 2007, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[10]  H. Weber,et al.  Voids and interlayer gaps in Class 1 posterior composite restorations: a comparison between a microlayer and a 2-layer technique. , 2006, Quintessence international.

[11]  Bruce J Crispin,et al.  Indirect composite restorations: alternative or replacement for ceramic? , 2002, Compendium of continuing education in dentistry.

[12]  R. B. Winstanley.  Research Summary: Tooth preparation for porcelain veneers – which technique do I use? , 2002, British Dental Journal.

[13]  M. Hagge,et al.  Shear bond strength of an autopolymerizing core buildup composite bonded to dentin with 9 dentin adhesive systems. , 2001, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[14]  S Ishigaki,et al.  Stress analysis of metal-free polymer crowns using the three-dimensional finite element method. , 2001, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[15]  R. Jackson,et al.  The new posterior resins and a simplified placement technique. , 2000, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[16]  A. H. Tjan,et al.  Fracture load and mode of failure of ceramic veneers with different preparations. , 2000, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[17]  T. Dérand,et al.  Effect of margin design, cement polymerization, and angle of loading on stress in porcelain veneers. , 1999, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[18]  N. Creugers,et al.  Survival of three types of veneer restorations in a clinical trial: a 2.5-year interim evaluation. , 1998, Journal of dentistry.

[19]  K. Zeng,et al.  Flexure tests on dental ceramics. , 1996, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[20]  S. Berksun,et al.  Repair of fractured porcelain restorations with composite bonded porcelain laminate contours. , 1993, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[21]  Robbins Jw.  Color characterization of porcelain veneers. , 1991 .

[22]  G. McLaughlin,et al.  Porcelain fused to tooth--the state of the art. , 1988, Restorative dentistry.

[23]  J. Calamia.  Materials and technique for etched porcelain facial veneers. , 1988, The Alpha omegan.

[24]  C. Hagberg,et al.  Assessment of bite force: a review. , 1987, Journal of craniomandibular disorders : facial & oral pain.

[25]  Clifford M. Sturdevant,et al.  The Art and Science of Operative Dentistry , 1984 .