Crowd Sourcing, with a Few Answers: Recommending Commuters for Traffic Updates

Real-time traffic awareness applications are playing an ever increasing role understanding and tackling traffic congestion in cities. First-hand accounts from drivers witnessing an incident is an invaluable source of information for traffic managers. Nowadays, drivers increasingly contact control rooms through social media to report on journey times, accidents or road weather conditions. These new interactions allow traffic controllers to engage users, and in particular to query them for information rather than passively collecting it. Querying participants presents the challenge of which users to probe for updates about a specific situation. In order to maximise the probability of a user responding and the accuracy of the information, we propose a strategy which takes into account the engagement levels of the user, the mobility profile and the reputation of the user. We provide an analysis of a real-world user corpus of Twitter users contributing updates to LiveDrive, a Dublin based traffic radio station.

[1]  Freddy Lécué,et al.  Westland row why so slow?: fusing social media and linked data sources for understanding real-time traffic conditions , 2013, IUI '13.

[2]  Gennady L. Andrienko,et al.  Tracing the German centennial flood in the stream of tweets: first lessons learned , 2013, GEOCROWD '13.

[3]  Maria Regina Justina E. Estuar,et al.  Profiling Flood Risk through Crowdsourced Flood Level Reports , 2014, 2014 International Conference on IT Convergence and Security (ICITCS).

[4]  Leysia Palen,et al.  Learning from the crowd: Collaborative filtering techniques for identifying on-the-ground Twitterers during mass disruptions , 2012, ISCRAM.

[5]  Yutaka Matsuo,et al.  Earthquake shakes Twitter users: real-time event detection by social sensors , 2010, WWW '10.

[6]  Cyrus Shahabi,et al.  GeoCrowd: enabling query answering with spatial crowdsourcing , 2012, SIGSPATIAL/GIS.

[7]  Katharina Morik,et al.  Heterogeneous Stream Processing and Crowdsourcing for Urban Traffic Management , 2014, EDBT.

[8]  Alireza Sahami Shirazi,et al.  Location-based crowdsourcing: extending crowdsourcing to the real world , 2010, NordiCHI.

[9]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[10]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Crowdsourcing Spatial Phenomena Using Trust-Based Heteroskedastic Gaussian Processes , 2013, HCOMP.

[11]  Andreas Krause,et al.  Toward Community Sensing , 2008, 2008 International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (ipsn 2008).

[12]  T. L. Brink,et al.  R.L. Keeney, H. Raiffa: Decisions with multiple objectives–preferences and value tradeoffs, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge & New York, 1993, 569 pages, ISBN 0‐521‐44185‐4 (hardback), 0‐521‐43883‐7 (paperback) , 1994 .

[13]  Dimitrios Gunopulos,et al.  Misco: A System for Data Analysis Applications on Networks of Smartphones Using MapReduce , 2012, 2012 IEEE 13th International Conference on Mobile Data Management.

[14]  F. B. Vernadat,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs , 1994 .