The laboratory approach to the diagnosis of autoimmune diseases: is it time to change?

Array technology and proteomics are about to launch the era of multiplexed analysis, which allows simultaneous detection of numerous autoantibody specificities and the possibility of defining broad autoantibody profiles. This will probably improve disease staging, risk stratification, prognosis and treatment. However, although these technologies are very promising, they are still in their infancy, and therefore need to undergo strict analytical and clinical validation processes. The latter should involve clinicians and pathologists in prospective, multicentric studies conducted on large numbers of patients to define the specific significance of the various autoantibody profiles. Establishing common standards for the publication and sharing of microarray-generated data will be important for this purpose. Only when these studies have been completed will these new technologies find a place in clinical laboratories. Although we are entering a decade which will probably see a radical change in the diagnostic approach to autoimmune diseases, we do not yet have sufficient knowledge to apply proteomic technologies on a large scale. For the time being, therefore, it is advisable to continue using well-established approaches and diagnostic algorithms such as those reported in the international guidelines, which have been prepared in accordance with the principles of appropriateness and evidence-based medicine.

[1]  José M González-Buitrago,et al.  Present and future of the autoimmunity laboratory. , 2006, Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry.

[2]  P. Limburg,et al.  Prevention of relapses in systemic lupus erythematosus , 1995, The Lancet.

[3]  R J Falk,et al.  International Consensus Statement on Testing and Reporting of Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibodies (ANCA) , 1999, American journal of clinical pathology.

[4]  M. Glocker,et al.  Proteome analysis reveals disease-associated marker proteins to differentiate RA patients from other inflammatory joint diseases with the potential to monitor anti-TNFalpha therapy. , 2004, Pathology, research and practice.

[5]  Eytan Domany,et al.  Functional immunomics: Microarray analysis of IgG autoantibody repertoires predicts the future response of mice to induced diabetes , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  E. Petricoin,et al.  A serum proteomic approach to gauging the state of remission in Wegener's granulomatosis. , 2005, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[7]  K. Clauser,et al.  Use of mass spectrometry to identify protein biomarkers of disease severity in the synovial fluid and serum of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. , 2004, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[8]  J F Fries,et al.  The 1982 revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. , 1982, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[9]  Eshrat S. Emamian,et al.  The use of microarrays to study autoimmunity. , 2004, The journal of investigative dermatology. Symposium proceedings.

[10]  Lawrence Steinman,et al.  Autoantibody profiling for the study and treatment of autoimmune disease , 2002, Arthritis research.

[11]  G. Eisenbarth,et al.  Autoantibodies in human diabetes. , 2001, Current directions in autoimmunity.

[12]  A. Wiik Appropriateness of autoantibody testing in clinical medicine. , 2003, Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry.

[13]  H. M. Geysen,et al.  Use of peptide synthesis to probe viral antigens for epitopes to a resolution of a single amino acid. , 1984, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  M. Caron,et al.  An efficient proteomics-based approach for the screening of autoantibodies. , 2005, Journal of immunological methods.

[15]  M. Hochberg,et al.  Updating the American College of Rheumatology revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. , 1997, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[16]  W. Robinson,et al.  Millennium Award Recipient Contribution Proteomics for the Development of Dna Tolerizing Vaccines to Treat Autoimmune Disease , 2022 .

[17]  S. James National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement on Celiac Disease, June 28-30, 2004. , 2005, Gastroenterology.

[18]  M. Tampoia,et al.  Proteomic: new advances in the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis. , 2005, Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry.

[19]  T. The,et al.  Prevention of relapses in Wegener's granulomatosis by treatment based on antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody titre , 1990, The Lancet.

[20]  Marco Pradella,et al.  Guidelines for the laboratory use of autoantibody tests in the diagnosis and monitoring of autoimmune rheumatic diseases. , 2002, American journal of clinical pathology.

[21]  A. Wiik,et al.  Appropriateness in anti-nuclear antibody testing: from clinical request to strategic laboratory practice. , 2004, Clinical and experimental rheumatology.

[22]  E. Tan,et al.  Autoantibodies in the diagnosis of systemicrheumatic diseases , 1995 .

[23]  G. Hu,et al.  Parallel detection of autoantibodies with microarrays in rheumatoid diseases. , 2004, Clinical chemistry.

[24]  Dieter Stoll,et al.  A microarray enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay for autoimmune diagnostics , 2000, Electrophoresis.

[25]  R Hal Scofield,et al.  Autoantibodies in Rheumatoid Arthritis Autoantibodies in Pregnancy Autoantibodies as Predictors of Disease , 2022 .

[26]  P. Brown,et al.  Autoantigen microarrays for multiplex characterization of autoantibody responses , 2002, Nature Medicine.

[27]  Debashis Ghosh,et al.  Autoantibody signatures in prostate cancer. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[28]  Mario Plebani,et al.  Appropriateness in programs for continuous quality improvement in clinical laboratories. , 2003, Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry.

[29]  J. Reveille,et al.  Guidelines for immunologic laboratory testing in the rheumatic diseases: an introduction. , 2002, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[30]  Christopher P Price,et al.  Application of the principles of evidence-based medicine to laboratory medicine. , 2003, Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry.

[31]  Bonnie Bruce,et al.  Antigen microarray profiling of autoantibodies in rheumatoid arthritis. , 2005, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[32]  Erika Check,et al.  Proteomics and cancer: Running before we can walk? , 2004, Nature.

[33]  D. Isenberg,et al.  Preliminary criteria for the classification of Sjögren's syndrome. Results of a prospective concerted action supported by the European Community. , 1993, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[34]  Luis Soares,et al.  An array of possibilities for the study of autoimmunity , 2005, Nature.