Tasks, Ensembles, and Activity

This article is concerned with characterizing literacy activity as it is practiced in professional workplaces. Its starting point is activity theory, which grew out of the work of Vygotsky and has been subsequently elaborated in Russia and elsewhere. First, the authors propose that existing versions of activity theory are unable to account adequately for practical human activity in contemporary workplaces, and present a revised perspective that opens the way for new theoretical developments. Second, they elaborate two new constructs, task and work ensemble, and apply them to a short collaborative writing sequence collected in the field. Both constructs are seen to account in a substantive way for the structure of the composing activity carried out by the collaborators. They close with a discussion of the complementarity and theoretical advantages of the two constructs.

[1]  Joanna G. Crammond,et al.  The Uses and Complexity of Argument Structures in Expert and Student Persuasive Writing , 1998 .

[2]  Y. Engeström Sociocultural psychology: Innovative organizational learning in medical and legal settings , 1995 .

[3]  E. Hutchins Cognition in the wild , 1995 .

[4]  I. Lakatos Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes , 1976 .

[5]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change , 1995 .

[6]  S. Heath Ways with Words: Language, Life and Work in Communities and Classrooms , 1983 .

[7]  James V. Wertsch,et al.  Culture, communication, and cognition : Vygotskian perspectives , 1987 .

[8]  Karl R. Popper The Logic of Scientific Discovery. , 1977 .

[9]  Charles Bazerman,et al.  Persuasion at a Distance. (Book Reviews: Shaping Written Knowledge. The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science.) , 1990 .

[10]  A. N. Leont’ev,et al.  Activity, consciousness, and personality , 1978 .

[11]  V. Lektorskiĭ,et al.  Subject, object, cognition , 1984 .

[12]  Michael Halliday,et al.  Cohesion in English , 1976 .

[13]  M. Cole A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition , 1993 .

[14]  Dixie Goswami,et al.  Writing in Non-Academic Settings. , 1981 .

[15]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[16]  A. Stetsenko Tool and Sign in the Development of the Child , 2004 .

[17]  J. Flavell The Developmental psychology of Jean Piaget , 1963 .

[18]  B. Rogoff,et al.  Everyday Cognition: Development in Social Context , 1999 .

[19]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data , 1984 .

[20]  L. Vygotsky Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes: Harvard University Press , 1978 .

[21]  Mary L. DeRemer,et al.  Writing assessment: Raters' elaboration of the rating task , 1998 .

[22]  N. Granott Unit of Analysis in Transit: From the Individual's Knowledge to the Ensemble Process , 1998 .

[23]  L. S. Vygotskiĭ,et al.  The history of the development of higher mental functions , 1997 .

[24]  G. Groen,et al.  A chronometric analysis of simple addition. , 1972 .

[25]  Carl H Frederiksen,et al.  Representing logical and semantic structure of knowledge acquired from discourse , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[26]  Allen Newell,et al.  Human Problem Solving. , 1973 .

[27]  L. S. Vygotski II. The Problem of the Cultural Development of the Child , 1929 .

[28]  Robert W. Rieber,et al.  The Historical Meaning of the Crisis in Psychology , 1997 .

[29]  S. Witte,et al.  Writing as an Embodied Practice , 2001 .

[30]  J. Wertsch,et al.  The creation of context in joint problem-solving. , 1984 .

[31]  Guy J. Groen,et al.  Can Preschool Children Invent Addition Algorithms , 1977 .