Tumor treatment by direct electric current-tumor temperature and pH, electrode material and configuration

Electrotherapy with low-level direct current has been suggested as an effective regional cancer treatment. A great variety of electrode materials, their placement with respect to tumor (i.e. electrode configurations) current levels and therapeutic schedules have been employed to date. In our paper the impact of electrode materials and configurations was studied, employing the same treatment parameters and schedule, on the subcutaneously grown solid tumor fibrosarcoma SA-1 in A/J mice. The effect of electrotherapy was assessed by tumor volume determination on each consecutive day and by determination of the extent of necrosis along the tumor's greatest diameter immediately after electrotherapy, 24, 48 and 72 hours later. The development of tumor necrosis after electrotherapy application differed for different electrode configurations. Intratumoral temperature and pH were measured before and after the application of electrotherapy in all electrode configurations used. Irrespective of the electrode configuration the intratumoral temperature was unchanged by electrotherapy. Considerable variations in pH were revealed for configurations where one electrode was inserted into the tumor, whereas in configurations with both electrodes outside, the tumor pH remained unchanged by electrotherapy. Electrodes made of platinum, platinum (90%) :iridium (10%) alloy, gold, silver and titanium were used for current delivery, and significant tumor growth retardation was achieved irrespective of electrode configuration and material (p< 0.001, Mann-Whitney Rank-Sum test). In addition to possible toxicity arising from dissolved metal ions and products of electrochemical reactions, which may result from electrolysis, direct effects of current on tumor and immune cells are suggested.

[1]  Andrew A. Marino,et al.  Electrical treatment of Lewis lung carcinoma in mice. , 1986, The Journal of surgical research.

[2]  I W Taylor,et al.  Cell cycle regulation by environmental pH , 1984, Journal of cellular physiology.

[3]  K. Smetana,et al.  Positive effect of direct current on cytotoxicity of human lymphocytes. , 1989, Neoplasma.

[4]  L. Samuelsson,et al.  Electrolysis with Different Electrode Materials and Combined with Irradiation for Treatment of Experimental Rat Tumors , 1991, Acta radiologica.

[5]  Charles Polk,et al.  CRC Handbook of Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields , 1986 .

[6]  M. Poo In situ electrophoresis of membrane components. , 1981, Annual review of biophysics and bioengineering.

[7]  H. S. Burr,et al.  Electrometrics of Atypical Growth * , 1952, The Yale journal of biology and medicine.

[8]  C. E. Humphrey,et al.  Biophysical Approach toward Tumor Regression in Mice , 1959, Science.

[9]  M. B. Habal Effect of applied dc currents on experimental tumor growth in rats. , 1980, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[10]  S. Rebersek,et al.  Tumor Bioelectric Potential and its Possible Exploitation for Tumor Growth Retardation , 1990 .

[11]  泰三 佐々木,et al.  W.Liller編: Space Astrophsics, Mc Graw-Hill Book Co., New York, 1961, 272頁, 16×24cm, $10). , 1962 .

[12]  C. Janney,et al.  Effects of Varying Potential and Electrolytic Dosage in Direct Current Treatment of Tumors , 1991, Acta radiologica.

[13]  BARNETT ROSENBERG,et al.  Inhibition of Cell Division in Escherichia coli by Electrolysis Products from a Platinum Electrode , 1965, Nature.

[14]  D. Absolom,et al.  Effect of low level direct current on in vivo tumor growth in hamsters. , 1985, Cancer research.

[15]  B. Keppler,et al.  New tumor-inhibiting metal complexes. , 1990, Cancer treatment reviews.

[16]  B. Nordenstrom Biologically Closed Electric Circuits: Activation of Vascular Interstitial Closed Electric Circuits for Treatment of Inoperable Cancers , 1984 .