Impact of accelerometer wear time on physical activity data: a NHANES semisimulation data approach

Background Current research practice employs wide-ranging accelerometer wear time criteria to identify a valid day of physical activity (PA) measurement. Objective To evaluate the effects of varying amounts of daily accelerometer wear time on PA data. Methods A total of 1000 days of accelerometer data from 1000 participants (age=38.7±14.3 years; body mass index=28.2±6.7 kg/m2) were selected from the 2005–2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Study data set. A reference data set was created using 200 random days with 14 h/day of wear time. Four additional samples of 200 days were randomly selected with a wear time of 10, 11, 12 and 13 h/day1. These data sets were used in day-to-day comparison to create four semisimulation data sets (10, 11, 12, 13 h/day) from the reference data set. Differences in step count and time spent in inactivity (<100 cts/min), light (100–1951 cts/min), moderate (1952–5724 cts/min) and vigorous (≥5725 cts/min) intensity PA were assessed using repeated-measures analysis of variance and absolute percent error (APE). Results There were significant differences for moderate intensity PA between the reference data set and semisimulation data sets of 10 and 11 h/day. Differences were observed in 10–13 h/day1 for inactivity and light intensity PA, and 10–12 h/day for steps (all p values <0.05). APE increased with shorter wear time (13 h/day=3.9–14.1%; 12 h/day=9.9–15.2%, 11 h/day=17.1–35.5%; 10 h/day=24.6–40.3%). Discussion These data suggest that using accelerometer wear time criteria of 12 h/day or less may underestimate step count and time spent in various PA levels.

[1]  Ann Forsyth,et al.  The built environment, walking, and physical activity: Is the environment more important to some people than others? , 2009 .

[2]  B. Ainsworth,et al.  Estimation of energy expenditure using CSA accelerometers at hip and wrist sites. , 2000, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[3]  N. Owen,et al.  Too little exercise and too much sitting: Inactivity physiology and the need for new recommendations on sedentary behavior , 2008, Current cardiovascular risk reports.

[4]  L. Mâsse,et al.  Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer. , 2008, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[5]  Michael Sjöström,et al.  Measuring physical activity-related environmental factors: reliability and predictive validity of the European environmental questionnaire ALPHA , 2010, The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity.

[6]  S. Blair,et al.  Comparing physical activity measures in a diverse group of midlife and older adults. , 2010, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[7]  P. Freedson,et al.  Amount of time spent in sedentary behaviors in the United States, 2003-2004. , 2008, American journal of epidemiology.

[8]  Bernard F Fuemmeler,et al.  Accelerometer data reduction: a comparison of four reduction algorithms on select outcome variables. , 2005, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[9]  L. Ada,et al.  Duration of physical activity is normal but frequency is reduced after stroke: an observational study. , 2011, Journal of physiotherapy.

[10]  D. Rowe,et al.  Daily walking in older adults: day-to-day variability and criterion-referenced validity of total daily step counts. , 2007, Journal of physical activity & health.

[11]  Song Yang,et al.  Imputation of missing data when measuring physical activity by accelerometry. , 2005, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[12]  C. Craig,et al.  Physical activity of Canadian adults: accelerometer results from the 2007 to 2009 Canadian Health Measures Survey. , 2011, Health reports.

[13]  Minsoo Kang,et al.  Individual Information-Centered Approach for Handling Physical Activity Missing Data , 2009, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[14]  Lewis H Kuller,et al.  Issues in accelerometer methodology: the role of epoch length on estimates of physical activity and relationships with health outcomes in overweight, post-menopausal women , 2010, The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity.

[15]  S. Blair,et al.  Physical activity for health: What kind? How much? How intense? On top of what? , 2011, Annual review of public health.

[16]  Richard P Troiano,et al.  A timely meeting: objective measurement of physical activity. , 2005, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[17]  Robert W Motl,et al.  Accelerometry and its association with objective markers of walking limitations in ambulatory adults with multiple sclerosis. , 2010, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[18]  M. Hagströmer,et al.  Physical activity and inactivity in an adult population assessed by accelerometry. , 2007, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[19]  Daniel S. Laferriere,et al.  Reliability of RT3 accelerometers among overweight and obese adults. , 2009, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[20]  P. Hauri,et al.  An American Academy of Sleep Medicine Review , 2000 .

[21]  Kelly R Evenson,et al.  Assessment of Differing Definitions of Accelerometer Nonwear Time , 2009, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[22]  H J Montoye,et al.  Variability of some objective measures of physical activity. , 1992, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[23]  Minsoo Kang,et al.  How many hours are enough? Accelerometer wear time may provide bias in daily activity estimates. , 2013, Journal of physical activity & health.

[24]  Minsoo Kang,et al.  How Many Days Are Enough? A Study of 365 Days of Pedometer Monitoring , 2009, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[25]  A. Sadeh,et al.  The role of actigraphy in sleep medicine. , 2002, Sleep medicine reviews.

[26]  R. Valliant,et al.  3. Validation of a Diary Measure of Children's Physical Activities , 2008 .

[27]  David R Bassett,et al.  Sources of variance in daily physical activity levels as measured by an accelerometer. , 2002, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[28]  B. Ainsworth,et al.  Intra-individual variation and estimates of usual physical activity. , 1999, Annals of epidemiology.

[29]  K. Evenson Towards an Understanding of Change in Physical Activity from Pregnancy Through Postpartum. , 2011, Psychology of sport and exercise.

[30]  Mark S Tremblay,et al.  Quality control and data reduction procedures for accelerometry-derived measures of physical activity. , 2010, Health reports.

[31]  U. Ekelund,et al.  Field Evaluation of the Computer Science and Application's Inc. Activity Monitor during Running and Skating Training in Adolescent Athletes , 2000, International journal of sports medicine.

[32]  C. Pollak,et al.  The role of actigraphy in the study of sleep and circadian rhythms. , 2003, Sleep.

[33]  A. Bauman,et al.  Physical activity and public health: updated recommendation for adults from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. , 2007, Circulation.

[34]  Willem van Mechelen,et al.  Disagreement in physical activity assessed by accelerometer and self-report in subgroups of age, gender, education and weight status , 2009, The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity.

[35]  Gerald J. Jerome,et al.  Patterns of Physical Activity Among Overweight and Obese Adults , 2009, Preventing chronic disease.

[36]  Ann Forsyth,et al.  The Street Level Built Environment and Physical Activity and Walking , 2011 .

[37]  Stewart G Trost,et al.  Conducting accelerometer-based activity assessments in field-based research. , 2005, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[38]  P S Freedson,et al.  Calibration of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. accelerometer. , 1998, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[39]  Minsoo Kang,et al.  Experimental Determination of Effectiveness of an Individual Information-Centered Approach in Recovering Step-Count Missing Data , 2005 .