Development of an aviation safety locus of control scale.

INTRODUCTION Individual differences in locus of control have be shown to be associated with differential risk for accident involvement among industrial and hospital workers. Previous research has also de onstrated that pilots are higher on internality than externality. HYPOTHESIS This study was performed to assess individual differences on a new scale developed to assess locus of control with respect to aviation safe It was hypothesized that pilots would exhibit higher levels of internalility than externality on this new scale. METHODS An existing safety locuss of control scale was modified to place the items in an aviation context, and the items were administered to a sample of approximately 480 pilots. Internality and externality subscales were created, and construct valid was assessed by correlating these subscales with measures of resignation and involvement in hazardous aviation events. RESULTS The subscales exhibited acceptable internal consistency, and were negatively correlated (r = -0.419, p < 0.001). Consistent with previous research, pilots exhibited substantially higher internality than externality. Correlation the subscales with the measures of resignation and involvement hazardous events supported the construct validity of the scale. DISCUSSION Differences exist among pilots on the Aviation Safety Locusof Control scale that may be associated with increased accident risk. In its present form, the new scale might be employed as a self-awareness exercise for pilots or as a covariate in research investigating the effect of other factors on accident involvement.

[1]  K. Wallston,et al.  Development and validation of the health locus of control (HLC) scale. , 1976, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[2]  D Regis Self-concept and conformity in theories of health education. , 1990 .

[3]  J. Rotter Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. , 1966, Psychological monographs.

[4]  David R. Hunter,et al.  Airman Research Questionnaire. Methodology and Overall Results. , 1995 .

[5]  John W. Jones,et al.  Development and Validation of the Safety Locus of Control Scale , 1985, Perceptual and motor skills.

[6]  A. Comrey,et al.  Internality and externality as correlates of involvement in fatal driving accidents. , 1987, The Journal of applied psychology.

[7]  John W. Jones,et al.  Safety locus of control and employees' accidents , 1993 .

[8]  Paul J. Andrisani,et al.  Internal-external control as contributor to and outcome of work experience. , 1976 .

[9]  H. Lefcourt Locus of control: Current trends in theory and research , 1976 .

[10]  D M Donovan,et al.  The Drinking-Related Locus of Control Scale. Reliability, factor structure and validity. , 1978, Journal of studies on alcohol.

[11]  John P. Robinson,et al.  Measures Of Personality And Social Psychological Attitudes , 1991 .

[12]  David R. Hunter,et al.  Retrospective and Prospective Validity of Aircraft Accident Risk Indicators , 2001, Hum. Factors.

[13]  H Wichman,et al.  Locus of control, self-serving biases, and attitudes towards safety in general aviation pilots. , 1983, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[14]  B. Collins,et al.  Four components of the Rotter Internal-External scale: belief in a difficult world, a just world, a pedictable world, and a politically responsive world. , 1974, Journal of personality and social psychology.