Motion sickness increases functional connectivity between visual motion and nausea-associated brain regions

The brain networks supporting nausea not yet understood. We previously found that while visual stimulation activated primary (V1) and extrastriate visual cortices (MT+/V5, coding for visual motion), increasing nausea was associated with increasing sustained activation in several brain areas, with significant co-activation for anterior insula (aIns) and mid-cingulate (MCC) cortices. Here, we hypothesized that motion sickness also alters functional connectivity between visual motion and previously identified nausea-processing brain regions. Subjects prone to motion sickness and controls completed a motion sickness provocation task during fMRI/ECG acquisition. We studied changes in connectivity between visual processing areas activated by the stimulus (MT+/V5, V1), right aIns and MCC when comparing rest (BASELINE) to peak nausea state (NAUSEA). Compared to BASELINE, NAUSEA reduced connectivity between right and left V1 and increased connectivity between right MT+/V5 and aIns and between left MT+/V5 and MCC. Additionally, the change in MT+/V5 to insula connectivity was significantly associated with a change in sympathovagal balance, assessed by heart rate variability analysis. No state-related connectivity changes were noted for the control group. Increased connectivity between a visual motion processing region and nausea/salience brain regions may reflect increased transfer of visual/vestibular mismatch information to brain regions supporting nausea perception and autonomic processing. We conclude that vection-induced nausea increases connectivity between nausea-processing regions and those activated by the nauseogenic stimulus. This enhanced low-frequency coupling may support continual, slowly evolving nausea perception and shifts toward sympathetic dominance. Disengaging this coupling may be a target for biobehavioral interventions aimed at reducing motion sickness severity.

[1]  Ajay D. Wasan,et al.  Sustained deep-tissue pain alters functional brain connectivity , 2013, PAIN®.

[2]  E. Brown,et al.  A point-process model of human heartbeat intervals: new definitions of heart rate and heart rate variability. , 2005, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[3]  V. Napadow,et al.  Brain white matter microstructure is associated with susceptibility to motion‐induced nausea , 2013, Neurogastroenterology and motility : the official journal of the European Gastrointestinal Motility Society.

[4]  Ronald G. García,et al.  The Somatosensory Link in Fibromyalgia: Functional Connectivity of the Primary Somatosensory Cortex Is Altered by Sustained Pain and Is Associated With Clinical/Autonomic Dysfunction , 2015, Arthritis & rheumatology.

[5]  L. Wald,et al.  32‐channel 3 Tesla receive‐only phased‐array head coil with soccer‐ball element geometry , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  Angela Marchi,et al.  Heart rate variability in untreated newly diagnosed temporal lobe epilepsy: Evidence for ictal sympathetic dysregulation , 2016, Epilepsia.

[7]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[8]  Kyungmo Park,et al.  The brain circuitry underlying the temporal evolution of nausea in humans. , 2013, Cerebral cortex.

[9]  H. Critchley,et al.  Neural systems supporting interoceptive awareness , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[10]  Mark W Greenlee,et al.  Neural correlates of visually induced self-motion illusion in depth. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[11]  E. Muth Motion and space sickness: Intestinal and autonomic correlates , 2006, Autonomic Neuroscience.

[12]  Hiroki Yamamoto,et al.  Inter-hemispheric desynchronization of the human MT+ during visually induced motion sickness , 2015, Experimental Brain Research.

[13]  Sergio Cerutti,et al.  Brain Circuitry Supporting Multi-Organ Autonomic Outflow in Response to Nausea. , 2014, Cerebral cortex.

[14]  V. Calhoun,et al.  Functional network connectivity during rest and task conditions: A comparative study , 2013, Human brain mapping.

[15]  P. Fransson How default is the default mode of brain function? Further evidence from intrinsic BOLD signal fluctuations , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[16]  Linda Geerligs,et al.  State and Trait Components of Functional Connectivity: Individual Differences Vary with Mental State , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  S. Wiens Interoception in emotional experience , 2005, Current opinion in neurology.

[18]  Nicola Toschi,et al.  Physiologic autonomic arousal heralds motor manifestations of seizures in nocturnal frontal lobe epilepsy: implications for pathophysiology. , 2012, Sleep medicine.

[19]  J. Golding Motion sickness susceptibility questionnaire revised and its relationship to other forms of sickness , 1998, Brain Research Bulletin.

[20]  Michelle Hampson,et al.  Changes in functional connectivity of human MT/V5 with visual motion input , 2004, Neuroreport.

[21]  Alexis T Baria,et al.  Anatomical and Functional Assemblies of Brain BOLD Oscillations , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  A. Craig How do you feel? Interoception: the sense of the physiological condition of the body , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[23]  Susan L. Whitfield-Gabrieli,et al.  Conn: A Functional Connectivity Toolbox for Correlated and Anticorrelated Brain Networks , 2012, Brain Connect..

[24]  V. Napadow,et al.  The Autonomic Brain: An Activation Likelihood Estimation Meta-Analysis for Central Processing of Autonomic Function , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  Jennifer L. Campos,et al.  Vection and visually induced motion sickness: how are they related? , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[26]  E. Brown,et al.  Static and dynamic autonomic response with increasing nausea perception. , 2011, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.