Staging liver fibrosis by analysis of non-linear normalization texture in gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging

Purpose: A reliable non-invasive approach for accurate staging fibrosis is still under development. In this study, we utilized a computer aided diagnosis (CAD) system to analyze equilibrium phase magnetic resonance (MR) images in a rat model to determine relative accuracy of staging liver fibrosis with CAD. Methods: Experimental rats were injected with a mixture of CCl4 to generate varying stages of fibrosis and equilibrium phase images of rats were acquired. All rats were grouped based on histological stages (F0, F1, F2, F3 and F4). During the process of CAD, the first step was manual section of region of interest (ROI) with 10*10 pixels guided by histology. Next, Lloyd's algorithm and linear normalization were both used to compress ROIs to 256 gray level. Then, 80 texture features based on the gray level co-occurrence matrix were extracted. Lastly, the back-propagation (BP), linear, k-nearest neighbor and support vector machine classifiers were individually used to classify F0-F4. Results: With histological staging as a reference, we found that performance of the BP classifier based on Lloyd's algorithm in staging fibrosis was better than that of linear normalization. Staging accuracy rates of the former were 67.27%, 80.26% and 79.41% for F0 versus F3, F2 versus F4 and F3 versus F4, respectively, secondary to none of the other classifiers. Conclusions: The assessment of equilibrium phase MR images with CAD can effectively stage rat liver fibrosis. This article highlights progress in developing a reliable non-invasive liver fibrosis staging procedure.

[1]  Celia P. Corona-Villalobos,et al.  Assessing liver fibrosis: Comparison of arterial enhancement fraction and diffusion‐weighted imaging , 2014, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[2]  S. Venkatesh,et al.  Magnetic resonance elastography for the detection and staging of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B , 2013, European Radiology.

[3]  Peter E. Hart,et al.  Nearest neighbor pattern classification , 1967, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[4]  R. Ehman,et al.  Magnetic resonance elastography of liver: Technique, analysis, and clinical applications , 2013, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[5]  Hao Liu,et al.  An improved image quality objective assessment method using non-linear calibration algorithm , 2014, 2014 7th International Congress on Image and Signal Processing.

[6]  J. Stoker,et al.  Non-invasive evaluation of liver fibrosis: a comparison of ultrasound-based transient elastography and MR elastography in patients with viral hepatitis B and C , 2014, European Radiology.

[7]  J. Fallowfield,et al.  Pathogenesis and treatment of hepatic fibrosis: is cirrhosis reversible? , 2011, Clinical medicine.

[8]  Jitendra Virmani,et al.  Prediction of Cirrhosis Based on Singular Value Decomposition of Gray Level Co-occurence Marix and aNneural Network Classifier , 2011, 2011 Developments in E-systems Engineering.

[9]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[10]  Jeong Min Lee,et al.  MR elastography for noninvasive assessment of hepatic fibrosis: Experience from a tertiary center in asia , 2011, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[11]  H. Fukuda,et al.  An image analyzing system using an artificial neural network for evaluating the parenchymal echo pattern of cirrhotic liver and chronic hepatitis , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  R. Semelka,et al.  Chronic hepatitis: Correlation of early patchy and late linear enhancement patterns on gadolinium‐enhanced MR images with histopathology initial experience , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[13]  A. Ba-Ssalamah,et al.  Liver fibrosis: histopathologic and biochemical influences on diagnostic efficacy of hepatobiliary contrast-enhanced MR imaging in staging. , 2013, Radiology.

[14]  Leo Joskowicz,et al.  fMRI-Based Hierarchical SVM Model for the Classification and Grading of Liver Fibrosis , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  H. Fujita,et al.  Computer-aided diagnosis of hepatic fibrosis: preliminary evaluation of MRI texture analysis using the finite difference method and an artificial neural network. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[16]  M. House,et al.  Texture‐based classification of liver fibrosis using MRI , 2015, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[17]  R. Bülow,et al.  Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for staging liver fibrosis is less reliable in the presence of fat and iron , 2013, European Radiology.

[18]  H. Fujita,et al.  Staging hepatic fibrosis: Computer‐aided analysis of hepatic contours on gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid‐enhanced hepatocyte‐phase magnetic resonance imaging , 2012, Hepatology.

[19]  Yu Kun Huang,et al.  Computer Aided Interpretation of Fibrous Texture in Hepatic Magnetic Resonance Images , 2013 .

[20]  P. Zhang,et al.  Apparent diffusion coefficient measurements and Gd-DTPA enhanced-imaging in staging hepatic fibrosis in rats. , 2015, International journal of clinical and experimental medicine.

[21]  I. B. Muchnik,et al.  Optimal requantization of deep grayscale images and Lloyd-Max quantization , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[22]  Reza Azmi,et al.  A New Markov Random Field Segmentation Method for Breast Lesion Segmentation in MR images , 2011, Journal of medical signals and sensors.

[23]  K. Saravanan,et al.  REVIEW ON CLASSIFICATION BASED ON ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS , 2014 .

[24]  Timothy R Card,et al.  Reduced mortality rates following elective percutaneous liver biopsies. , 2010, Gastroenterology.