Transonic Free-To-Roll Analysis of the F/A-18E and F-35 Configurations

The free-to-roll technique is used as a tool for predicting areas of uncommanded lateral motions. Recently, the NASA/Navy/Air Force Abrupt Wing Stall Program extended the use of this technique to the transonic speed regime. Using this technique, this paper evaluates various wing configurations on the pre-production F/A-18E aircraft and the Joint Strike Fighter (F-35) aircraft. The configurations investigated include leading and trailing edge flap deflections, fences, leading edge flap gap seals, and vortex generators. These tests were conducted in the NASA Langley 16-Foot Transonic Tunnel. The analysis used a modification of a figure-of-merit developed during the Abrupt Wing Stall Program to discern configuration effects. The results showed how the figure-of-merit can be used to schedule wing flap deflections to avoid areas of uncommanded lateral motion. The analysis also used both static and dynamic wind tunnel data to provide insight into the uncommanded lateral behavior. The dynamic data was extracted from the time history data using parameter identification techniques. In general, modifications to the pre-production F/A-18E resulted in shifts in angle-of-attack where uncommanded lateral activity occurred. Sealing the gap between the inboard and outboard leading-edge flaps on the Navy version of the F-35 eliminated uncommanded lateral activity or delayed the activity to a higher angle-of-attack.

[1]  Robert M. Hall,et al.  Historical Review of Uncommanded Lateral-Directional Motions at Transonic Conditions , 2004 .

[2]  C. H. Wolowicz,et al.  Similitude requirements and scaling relationships as applied to model testing , 1979 .

[3]  David M. Schuster,et al.  Transonic Unsteady Aerodynamics of the F/A-18E Under Conditions Promoting Abrupt Wing Stall , 2004 .

[4]  J. R. Chambers,et al.  An Integrated Approach to Assessment of Abrupt Wing Stall for Advanced Aircraft (Invited) , 2003 .

[5]  Francis J. Capone,et al.  Development of a Free-to-Roll Transonic Test Capability (Invited) , 2003 .

[6]  Francis J. Capone,et al.  RECOMMENDED EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES FOR EVALUATION OF ABRUPT WING STALL CHARACTERISTICS , 2003 .

[7]  Shawn H. Woodson,et al.  Introduction to the Abrupt Wing Stall (AWS) Program , 2004 .

[8]  Alexander Kokolios,et al.  Use of Piloted Simulation for Evaluation of Abrupt-Wing-Stall Characteristics , 2005 .

[9]  Paresh Parikh,et al.  A Computational Study of the Abrupt Wing Stall (AWS) Characteristics for Various Fighter Jets: Part II, AV8B and F/A-18C , 2003 .

[10]  Bradford E. Green,et al.  F/A-18C to E Wing Morphing Study for the Abrupt Wing Stall Program , 2005 .

[11]  D. B. Owens,et al.  Correlation of the Continuous Beta Sweep Test and Analysis Technique to Transonic Free-to-Roll and Flight Test Results , 2004 .

[12]  D. Schuster,et al.  Transonic Unsteady Aerodynamics of the F/A-18E at Conditions Promoting Abrupt Wing Stall (Invited) , 2003 .

[13]  Michael Roesch,et al.  Flight-Test Assessment of Lateral Activity , 2005 .

[14]  Francis J. Capone,et al.  Transonic Free-to-Roll Analysis of Abrupt Wing Stall on Military Aircraft , 2004 .

[15]  Francis J. Capone,et al.  Usefulness of transonic model static data in predicting flight abrupt-wing-stall , 2004 .

[16]  P. C. Parikh,et al.  A computational study of the abrupt wing stall (AWS) characteristics for various fighter Jets: part II, AV-8B & F/A-18C , 2003, 2003 User Group Conference. Proceedings.

[17]  Francis J. Capone,et al.  AWS Figure of Merit (FOM) Developed Parameters from Static, Transonic Model Tests , 2003 .

[18]  Eugene A. Morelli,et al.  System IDentification Programs for AirCraft (SIDPAC) , 2002 .

[19]  James R. Forsythe,et al.  Unsteady CFD Calculations of Abrupt Wing Stall Using Detached-Eddy Simulation , 2003 .

[20]  Chintsun Hwang,et al.  Some observations on the mechanism of aircraft wing rock , 1978 .

[21]  Jeffrey K. McConnell Continuous Beta Sweep Test & Analysis Technique (CBSTAT) for Predicting Wing Drop Based on Static Wind Tunnel Testing , 2004 .

[22]  Paresh Parikh,et al.  A Computational Study of the AWS Characteristics for Various Fighter Jets: Part I, F/A-18E & F16-C , 2003 .

[23]  Paresh Parikh,et al.  AIAA 2003-0923 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CFD PROCEDURES FOR PREDICTING ABRUPT WING STALL , 2003 .

[24]  Joseph R. Chambers,et al.  Accomplishments of the Abrupt Wing Stall (AWS) Program and Future Research Requirements , 2003 .

[25]  John V. Foster,et al.  RECENT DYNAMIC MEASUREMENTS AND CONSIDERATIONS FOR AERODYNAMIC MODELING OF FIGHTER AIRPLANE CONFIGURATIONS , 1998 .

[26]  Philip Payne,et al.  Predicting Wing Drop in the Harrier II Using the Static Wind Tunnel Test and Analysis Technique CBSTAT , 2004 .