The factualization of ‘I suppose’ in American English: a corpus based study of the subjectification of epistemic predicates toward factuality

This work provides a case study centered on the cognitive phenomenon of factualization, viz. “the SP/W’s increasing certainty about the realization of an event or situation” (cf. Tantucci 2014, 2015a, b, 2016b). Factualization corresponds to a cognitive-control mechanism (i.e. Kan et al. 2013) specifically occurring in the epistemic domain. It instantiates both in online language production and throughout the diachronic reanalysis of a construction (i.e. grammaticalization, semasiological change or constructionalization, cf. Traugott and Dasher 2002; Traugott and Trousdale 2013). The case presented here focuses on the diachronic change of the epistemic construction I suppose in British English. It will be shown that I suppose developed through time an increasingly factual usage out of an original meaning conveying weak epistemicity. Qualitative and quantitative data from the Corpus of Historical American English will support the general claim that—to varying degrees—epistemic predicates diachronically tend to develop new polysemies encoding a Speaker/writer’s (henceforth SP/W) “subjectified form of certainty” towards a proposition P (cf. Tantucci 2015a: 371).

[1]  Vittorio Tantucci From immediate to extended intersubjectification: a gradient approach to intersubjective awareness and semasiological change , 2015, Language and Cognition.

[2]  Richard B. Dasher,et al.  Regularity in Semantic Change: Index of languages , 2001 .

[3]  Ronald W. Langacker,et al.  Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction , 2008 .

[4]  Eve Sweetser From Etymology to Pragmatics: Subject index , 1990 .

[5]  Ronald W. Langacker,et al.  Investigations in Cognitive Grammar , 2009 .

[6]  Heiko Narrog,et al.  On defining modality again , 2005 .

[7]  Vittorio Tantucci,et al.  Interpersonal evidentiality: The Mandarin V-过 guo construction and other evidential systems beyond the ‘source of information’ , 2013 .

[8]  Alan Cruse,et al.  A Glossary of Semantics and Pragmatics , 2006 .

[9]  Fabio Tamburini,et al.  The DiaCORIS project: a diachronic corpus of written Italian , 2006, LREC.

[10]  R. Passingham Attention to action. , 1996, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[11]  E. Traugott (Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification: A reassessment , 2010 .

[12]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[13]  Eve Sweetser From Etymology to Pragmatics: List of abbreviations , 1990 .

[14]  Eve Sweetser,et al.  From Etymology to Pragmatics: Preface , 1990 .

[15]  J. Nuyts Epistemic Modality, Language, and Conceptualization: A cognitive-pragmatic perspective , 2001 .

[16]  Edward J. Vajda,et al.  The languages of native North America , 1999 .

[17]  H. Narrog Polysemy and Indeterminacy in Modal Markers – The Case of Japanese beshi , 2002 .

[18]  Robert Stalnaker Context and content : essays on intentionality in speech and thought , 1999 .

[19]  Jan Nuyts,et al.  Notions of (inter)subjectivity , 2012 .

[20]  M. A. Jones Tense, aspect and mood , 1996 .

[21]  R. Dietrich Modalität im Deutschen , 1992 .

[22]  Modality, mood, and change of modal meanings: A new perspective , 2005 .

[23]  Elizabeth Closs Traugott,et al.  Motives for Language Change: From subjectification to intersubjectification , 2003 .

[24]  Stefan Th. Gries,et al.  Collostructions: Investigating the interaction of words and constructions , 2003 .

[25]  Vittorio Tantucci Toward a typology of constative speech acts: Actions beyond evidentiality, epistemic modality, and factuality , 2016 .

[26]  Elizabeth Closs Traugott,et al.  Subjectivity and subjectivisation: Subjectification in grammaticalisation , 1995 .

[27]  Irene P. Kan,et al.  To adapt or not to adapt: The question of domain-general cognitive control , 2013, Cognition.

[28]  P. Martini,et al.  Context, not conflict, drives cognitive control. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[29]  G. Schwartz,et al.  Consciousness and Self-Regulation , 1976 .

[30]  H. Narrog Modality in Japanese: The Layered Structure of the Clause and Hierarchies of Functional Categories , 2009 .

[31]  Dirk Geeraerts,et al.  Diachronic Prototype Semantics: A Contribution to Historical Lexicology , 1997 .

[32]  A. Simon-Vandenbergen Image-Building Through Modality: The Case of Political Interviews , 1996 .

[33]  F. Palmer,et al.  Mood and modality , 1986 .

[34]  A. Capone The pragmatics of pronominal clitics and propositional attitudes , 2013 .

[35]  J. Holmes MODIFYING ILLOCUTIONARY FORCE , 1984 .

[36]  Vittorio Tantucci Epistemic inclination and factualization: a synchronic and diachronic study on the semantic gradience of factuality , 2014, Language and Cognition.

[37]  Elizabeth Closs Traugott,et al.  Constructionalization and Constructional Changes , 2014 .

[38]  Vittorio Tantucci Textual factualization: The phenomenology of assertive reformulation and presupposition during a speech event , 2016 .

[39]  F. Kiefer ON DEFINING MODALITY , 1987 .

[40]  J. Holmes Hedges and boosters in women's and men's speech , 1990 .

[41]  M. Kinkade,et al.  The Languages of Native North America , 2000 .

[42]  E. Miller,et al.  An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[43]  Anna Papafragou,et al.  Modality: Issues in the Semantics-Pragmatics Interface , 2000 .

[44]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Attention to Action , 1986 .

[45]  M. Botvinick,et al.  Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. , 2001, Psychological review.

[46]  H. Narrog Modality, Subjectivity, and Semantic Change: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective , 2012 .

[47]  Bas Aarts Tense, Aspect and Mood , 2013 .

[48]  Elizabeth Closs Traugott,et al.  Intersubjectification and clause periphery , 2012 .

[49]  E. Traugott On the Rise of Epistemic Meanings in English: An Example of Subjectification in Semantic Change , 1989 .