The Citizen as Issue Specialists in a Changing Media Environment

Although recent research suggests that the selective nature of new media helps foster issue specialists, little empirical evidence has been documented, mostly due to theoretical and methodological limitations. Extending the concept of issue publics, the present study proposes a method to estimate the degree to which an individual is a specialist- or a generalist-type citizen. Applying the method to the 2008 American National Election Studies data, the study reveals various characteristics of specialists and generalists. The results indicate that specialist-type citizens are positively associated with online news use, but negatively associated with conventional news media, such as television, newspaper, and radio. The implications of the growth of specialists as well as the validity of the proposed method are discussed.

[1]  Jon A. Krosnick,et al.  Public Attitudes Toward Israel: A Study of the Attentive and Issue Publics , 1995 .

[2]  Young Mie Kim,et al.  Issue Publics in the New Information Environment , 2009, Commun. Res..

[3]  R. Armstrong.  The Long Tail: Why the Future of Business Is Selling Less of More , 2008 .

[4]  David M. Anderson,et al.  The Civic Web: Online Politics and Democratic Values , 2002 .

[5]  M. Prior,et al.  Post-Broadcast Democracy: How Media Choice Increases Inequality in Political Involvement and Polarizes Elections , 2003 .

[6]  Michael Henderson.  Issue Publics, Campaigns, and Political Knowledge , 2014 .

[7]  R. Garrett.  Politically Motivated Reinforcement Seeking: Reframing the Selective Exposure Debate , 2009 .

[8]  David Tewksbury.  What Do Americans Really Want to Know? Tracking the Behavior of News Readers on the Internet , 2003 .

[9]  W. Russell Neuman,et al.  The future of the mass audience , 1991 .

[10]  Narine S. Yegiyan,et al.  Informing Citizens: How People with Different Levels of Education Process Television, Newspaper, and Web News , 2009 .

[11]  Yariv Tsfati,et al.  Does Audience Skepticism of the Media Matter in Agenda Setting? , 2003 .

[12]  Yong Jin Park,et al.  Digital Literacy and Privacy Behavior Online , 2013, Commun. Res..

[13]  Jon A. Krosnick,et al.  Government policy and citizen passion: A study of issue publics in contemporary America , 1990 .

[14]  Y. M. Kim.  The Shifting Sands of Citizenship , 2012 .

[15]  Thomas J. Leeper,et al.  Self-Interest and Attention to News Among Issue Publics , 2013 .

[16]  Michael X. Delli Carpini,et al.  The Internet and an Informed Citizenry , 2002 .

[17]  Klaus Schoenbach,et al.  Presentation Style and Beyond: How Print Newspapers and Online News Expand Awareness of Public Affairs Issues , 2008 .

[18]  Carolyn A. Lin,et al.  Communication technology and social change : theory and implications , 2007 .

[19]  W. Bennett,et al.  The Personalization of Politics , 2012 .

[20]  Zheng Wang,et al.  Media Technology and the 24-Hour News Cycle , 2014 .

[21]  R. Veenhoven.  Return of Inequality in Modern Society? Test by Dispersion of Life-Satisfaction Across Time and Nations , 2005 .

[22]  Sanda Erdelez,et al.  Online news reading behavior: From habitual reading to stumbling upon news , 2011, ASIST.

[23]  C. Sunstein.  Republic.com , 2001 .

[24]  Hsuan-Ting Chen.  Multiple issue publics in the high-choice media environment: media use, online activity, and political knowledge , 2012 .

[25]  J. Krosnick.  The role of attitude importance in social evaluation: a study of policy preferences, presidential candidate evaluations, and voting behavior. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[26]  S. Keeter,et al.  What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters , 1996 .

[27]  S. M. Jang.  Seeking Congruency or Incongruency Online? , 2014 .

[28]  P. Converse.  The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics , 2004 .

[29]  Michael J. Robinson.  Public Affairs Television and the Growth of Political Malaise: The Case of “The Selling of the Pentagon” , 1976, American Political Science Review.

[30]  J. Krosnick,et al.  The causes and consequences of attitude importance. , 1995 .

[31]  A. Downs.  An Economic Theory of Democracy , 1957 .

[32]  J. Zaller,et al.  WHO GETS THE NEWS? ALTERNATIVE MEASURES OF NEWS RECEPTION AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH , 1993 .

[33]  Jae Kook Lee.  Incidental exposure to news: Limiting fragmentation in the new media environment , 2009 .

[34]  Chris Anderson,et al.  The Long Tail: Why the Future of Business is Selling Less of More , 2006 .

[35]  J. Krosnick,et al.  Attitude importance and the accumulation of attitude-relevant knowledge in memory. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[36]  Sanda Erdelez,et al.  Incidental exposure to online news , 2010, ASIST.

[37]  W. Bennett,et al.  A New Era of Minimal Effects? The Changing Foundations of Political Communication , 2008 .

[38]  Cliff Zukin,et al.  Passive Learning: When the Media Environment Is the Message , 1984 .

[39]  John Domingue,et al.  The Future of the Internet , 1999, Academia Letters.

[40]  David Tewksbury,et al.  Accidentally Informed: Incidental News Exposure on the World Wide Web , 2001 .

[41]  S. Mo Jang,et al.  The Internet, selective learning, and the rise of issue specialists , 2012, First Monday.

[42]  Michael Morgan,et al.  Charting the Mainstream: Television's Contributions to Political Orientations , 1982 .