PEDOTRANSFER FUNCTIONS FOR ESTIMATING SOIL BULK DENSITY FROM EXISTING SOIL SURVEY REPORTS IN BRAZIL

Abstract Soil bulk density ( D b ) measurement is essential to estimate soil carbon reserves. However, field sampling, specially at depth, and direct measurement of D b is labor intensive, tedious and often impractical. Thus regression models or pedotransfer functions (PTFs) based on easily measured soil properties are an alternative for laborious D b measurements. A forward stepwise multiple regression routine was used to predict D b from 17 soil properties using a data set (data set 1) constructed from the Soil Archives of Embrapa Solos, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. A first exploratory regression model using 1002 soil samples of data set 1 led to the development of a model, which indicated that total nitrogen (N), clay content (Clay) and sum of basic cations (SB) were the three strongest contributors to D b prediction (Adjusted- R 2  = 0.71, Standard error of the estimate = 0.10). A simplified regression model was developed using easily-measured soil attributes, such as soil organic carbon (TOC), Clay and SB. This model described 66% of the variation of D b in 1396 soil samples distributed at all depths (Standard error of the estimate = 0.11). Clay content showed a good correlation with predicted D b (Beta value = − 0.58) followed by TOC (Beta value = − 0.51) and SB (Beta value = 0.21). Partitioning the data set 1 into groups by soil depth (0–30 and 30–100 cm) and soil order (Latossolos and Argissolos) did not improve the accuracy of regression equations. In addition, we tested the D b predictive potential of the proposed model and three existing models (two from Brazil and one from the US) on an independent soil data set (data set 2). A general overestimation of predicted D b by the US model, with mean predicted error (MPE) of 0.11 shows that published PTFs developed on different environments should be used with care. Existing Brazilian models developed for the Amazon biome, on the other hand, were found to produce a slight underestimation with MPE values ranging from − 0.03 to − 0.16. The proposed simple regression model including Clay, TOC and SB was observed to be the most accurate and least biased.

[1]  Martial Bernoux,et al.  Bulk Densities of Brazilian Amazon Soils Related to Other Soil Properties , 1998 .

[2]  Robert J. Marquis,et al.  The Cerrados of Brazil: Ecology and Natural History of a Neotropical Savanna , 2002 .

[3]  M. E. C. Claessen.  Manual de métodos de análise de solo. , 1997 .

[4]  P. Motta.  O recurso natural solo , 1981 .

[5]  Hari Eswaran,et al.  Organic Carbon in Soils of the World , 1993 .

[6]  C. A. Tormena,et al.  Incorporação da densidade no ajuste de dois modelos à curva de retenção de água no solo , 2002 .

[7]  J. Francis.  Statistica for Windows , 1995 .

[8]  C. V. Manzatto,et al.  Uso agrícola dos solos brasileiros. , 2002 .

[9]  Sanjeev Kumar,et al.  A pedo-transfer function (PTF) for estimating soil bulk density from basic soil data and its comparison with existing PTFs , 2002 .

[10]  G. Hofman,et al.  Simulating nitrate leaching in bare fallow soils: a model comparison , 2003, Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems.

[11]  D. P. Franzmeier,et al.  2. Relation of Soils and Geomorphic Surfaces in the Brazilian Cerrado , 2002 .

[12]  Mozart Martins Ferreira,et al.  Influência da mineralogia da fração argila nas propriedades físicas de latossolos da região sudeste do Brasil , 1999 .

[13]  D. Coleman,et al.  Dynamics of Soil Organic Matter in Tropical Ecosystems , 1989 .

[14]  G. McCarty,et al.  Mid‐ and Near‐Infrared Spectroscopic Determination of Carbon in a Diverse Set of Soils from the Brazilian National Soil Collection , 2005 .

[15]  J. Thioulouse,et al.  Relationships between abiotic and biotic soil properties during fallow periods in the sudanian zone of Senegal , 2000 .

[16]  A. Tisdall.  Comparison of methods of determining apparent density of soils , 1951 .

[17]  P. Loveland,et al.  The carbon content of soil and its geographical distribution in Great Britain , 1995 .

[18]  F. Bingham,et al.  Chemical and mineralogical characteristics of selected acid soils of the state of Parana, Brazil , 1985 .

[19]  Martial Bernoux,et al.  Brazil's Soil Carbon Stocks , 2002 .

[20]  Ministerio das Minas e Energia,et al.  Projeto RADAM, Programa de Integracao Nacional. Levantamento de Recursos Naturais , 1973 .

[21]  J. Deckers,et al.  World Reference Base for Soil Resources , 1998 .

[22]  Abdul Mounem Mouazen,et al.  Modelling Compaction from On-line Measurement of Soil Properties and Sensor Draught , 2003, Precision Agriculture.

[23]  Javier Tomasella,et al.  Estimating soil water retention characteristics from limited data in Brazilian Amazonia , 1998 .

[24]  L. Manrique,et al.  BULK DENSITY OF SOILS IN RELATION TO SOIL PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES , 1991 .

[25]  Anthony R. Dexter,et al.  Soil physical quality: Part III: Unsaturated hydraulic conductivity and general conclusions about S-theory , 2004 .

[26]  S. Prasher,et al.  Evaluation of pedotransfer functions in predicting the soil water contents at field capacity and wilting point , 2004 .

[27]  P. Reich,et al.  Nitrogen deposition and plant species interact to influence soil carbon stabilization , 2004 .

[28]  P. Jardine,et al.  Using soil physical and chemical properties to estimate bulk density , 2005 .

[29]  W. A. Adams.  THE EFFECT OF ORGANIC MATTER ON THE BULK AND TRUE DENSITIES OF SOME UNCULTIVATED PODZOLIC SOILS , 1973 .

[30]  J. Diels,et al.  A comparison of the contributions of clay, silt, and organic matter to the effective CEC of soils of subsaharan Africa , 1997 .

[31]  L. H. C. Anjos,et al.  Sistema Brasileiro de Classificação de Solos. , 2006 .

[32]  Rattan Lal,et al.  Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry , 2015 .

[33]  M. Meirvenne,et al.  Predictive Quality of Pedotransfer Functions for Estimating Bulk Density of Forest Soils , 2005 .