Distributed Teaching Presence and Participants' Activity Profiles: a theoretical approach to the structural analysis of Asynchronous Learning Networks†

The rapid spread of learning networks based on asynchronous written communication — Asynchronous Learning Networks (ALNs) — makes it crucial to assess the possibilities offered by these new environments to facilitate and promote learning processes and learning outcomes. Our interest in this area is specifically directed towards the study of distributed teaching presence understood as the exercise of educational influence, i.e. as the help provided to each other participant in an ALN to promote individual and collective learning. We adopt a multi-method approach that integrates the structural analysis of presence (access and participation) and connectivity (reciprocity and responsiveness) with the content analysis of the participants’ contributions. This article focuses on structural analysis as a relevant and powerful tool for the study of collaborative learning in networking and asynchronous contexts. Its main objective is to show how a relevant and useful system of indicators and profiles, which identify and examine the distribution of educational influence in ALNs, can be constructed. We present the theoretical assumptions surrounding the concept of distributed teaching presence and illustrate the analysis with data from two didactic sequences in higher education. The results show that the structural analysis, when theoretically grounded and oriented, is a powerful tool for identifying different activity profiles related to different levels and modalities of the exercise of educational influence and for assessing the distributed teaching presence in learning networks. Finally, we discuss the benefits and constraints of this kind of analysis.

[1]  S. Järvelä,et al.  Combining Individual and Group-Level Perspectives for Studying Collaborative Knowledge Construction in Context. , 2007 .

[2]  Vic Lally,et al.  Investigating patterns of interaction in networked learning and computer-supported collaborative learning: A role for Social Network Analysis , 2007, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[3]  Vanessa Paz Dennen,et al.  Looking for evidence of learning: Assessment and analysis methods for online discourse , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[4]  C. Salvador,et al.  Ayudar a aprender en contextos educativos: el ejercicio de la influencia educativa y el análisis de la enseñanza , 2008 .

[5]  Tammy Schellens,et al.  Applying multilevel modelling to content analysis data: Methodological issues in the study of role assignment in asynchronous discussion groups , 2007 .

[6]  Sanna Järvelä,et al.  Analyzing CMC content for what? , 2006, Comput. Educ..

[7]  Sarah Schrire,et al.  Knowledge building in asynchronous discussion groups: Going beyond quantitative analysis , 2006, Comput. Educ..

[8]  Vic Lally,et al.  Online teaching in networked learning communities: A multi-method approach to studying the role of the teacher , 2007 .

[9]  Jan-Willem Strijbos,et al.  Methodological challenges for collaborative learning research , 2007 .

[10]  W. Jochems,et al.  The Effect of Functional Roles on Group Efficiency , 2004 .

[11]  Stefan Hrastinski,et al.  What is online learner participation? A literature review , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[12]  Jo Davies,et al.  Performance in e-learning: online participation and student grades , 2005, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[13]  Jim Hewitt How Habitual Online Practices Affect the Development of Asynchronous Discussion Threads , 2003 .

[14]  Cindy E. Hmelo-Silver,et al.  Analyzing collaborative knowledge construction: multiple methods for integrated understanding , 2003, Comput. Educ..

[15]  Luigi Sarti,et al.  A general framework for tracking and analysing learning processes in computer‐supported collaborative learning environments , 2007 .

[16]  Tammy Schellens,et al.  Content analysis schemes to analyze transcripts of online asynchronous discussion groups: A review , 2006, Comput. Educ..

[17]  A. E. Veldhuis-Diermanse CSCLearning? Participation, learning activities and knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning in higher education (Summary PhD dissertation) , 2002 .

[18]  Barry D. Davidson,et al.  Social networks, communication styles, and learning performance in a CSCL community , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[19]  Alejandra Martínez-Monés,et al.  Combining qualitative evaluation and social network analysis for the study of classroom social interactions , 2003, Comput. Educ..

[20]  Alejandra Martínez-Monés,et al.  From Mirroring to Guiding: A Review of State of the Art Technology for Supporting Collaborative Learning , 2005, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ..

[21]  Allyson Hadwin,et al.  Measurement and assessment in computer-supported collaborative learning , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..