Non-Operative Management of Polytraumatized Patients: Body Imaging beyond CT

In the transition from the operative to the conservative approach for the polytraumatized patients who undergo blunt trauma, diagnostic imaging has assumed a pivotal role, currently offering various opportunities, particularly in the follow-up of these patients. The choice of the most suitable imaging method in this setting mainly depends on the injury complications we are looking for, the patient conditions (mobilization, cooperation, medications, allergies and age), the biological invasiveness, and the availability of each imaging method. Computed Tomography (CT) represents the “standard” imaging technique in the polytraumatized patient due to the high diagnostic performance when a correct imaging protocol is adopted, despite suffering from invasiveness due to radiation dose and intravenous contrast agent administration. Ultrasound (US) is a readily available technology, cheap, bedside performable and integrable with intravenous contrast agent (Contrast enhanced US—CEUS) to enhance the diagnostic performance, but it may suffer particularly from limited panoramicity and operator dependance. Magnetic Resonance (MR), until now, has been adopted in specific contexts, such as biliopancreatic injuries, but in recent experiences, it showed a great potential in the follow-up of polytraumatized patients; however, its availability may be limited in some context, and there are specific contraindications, such as as claustrophobia and the presence non-MR compatible devices. In this article, the role of each imaging method in the body-imaging follow-up of adult polytraumatized patients will be reviewed, enhancing the value of integrated imaging, as shown in several cases from our experience.

[1]  R. Milton,et al.  Management of thoracic trauma , 2022, Anaesthesia.

[2]  K. Inaba,et al.  Follow-up strategies for patients with splenic trauma managed non-operatively: the 2022 World Society of Emergency Surgery consensus document , 2022, World Journal of Emergency Surgery.

[3]  B. Aarabi,et al.  Dual-energy CT imaging of chronic subdural hematoma membranes: technical note , 2022, European Radiology.

[4]  M. Körner,et al.  Is It Possible to Replace Conventional Radiography (CR) with a Dose Neutral Computed Tomography (CT) of the Cervical Spine in Emergency Radiology—An Experimental Cadaver Study , 2022, Diagnostics.

[5]  W. Horninger,et al.  Do we need repeated CT imaging in uncomplicated blunt renal injuries? Experiences of a high-volume urological trauma centre , 2022, World Journal of Emergency Surgery.

[6]  M. Di Serafino,et al.  Economic and clinical benefits of immediate total-body CT in the diagnostic approach to polytraumatized patients: a descriptive analysis through a literature review , 2022, La radiologia medica.

[7]  C. LeBedis,et al.  Dual energy CT angiography for lower extremity trauma: comparison with conventional CT , 2022, Emergency Radiology.

[8]  A. Peitzman,et al.  WSES guidelines on blunt and penetrating bowel injury: diagnosis, investigations, and treatment , 2022, World Journal of Emergency Surgery.

[9]  F. Iacobellis,et al.  Current Standards for and Clinical Impact of Emergency Radiology in Major Trauma , 2022, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[10]  F. Verde,et al.  The Technique and Advantages of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Diagnosis and Follow-Up of Traumatic Abdomen Solid Organ Injuries , 2021, Diagnostics.

[11]  L. Gharai,et al.  Minimal Aortic Injury Detected on Computed Tomography Angiography during Initial Trauma Imaging: Single Academic Level 1 Trauma Center Experience , 2021, AORTA.

[12]  A. Chandra,et al.  Missed pancreatic injury in patients undergoing conservative management of blunt abdominal trauma: Causes, sequelae and management. , 2021, Turkish journal of surgery.

[13]  Amonpon Kanlerd,et al.  Non-operative management for abdominal solidorgan injuries: A literature review , 2021, Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi.

[14]  M. Di Serafino,et al.  Role of MRI in early follow-up of patients with solid organ injuries: How and why we do it? , 2021, La radiologia medica.

[15]  D. Viscardi,et al.  Computed tomography imaging of septic shock. Beyond the cause: the “CT hypoperfusion complex”. A pictorial essay , 2021, Insights into Imaging.

[16]  K. Linnau,et al.  American Society of Emergency Radiology Multicenter Blunt Splenic Trauma Study: CT and Clinical Findings. , 2021, Radiology.

[17]  F. Berger,et al.  European Society of Emergency Radiology: guideline on radiological polytrauma imaging and service (short version) , 2020, Insights into Imaging.

[18]  F. Verde,et al.  Dual energy computed tomography evaluation of skeletal traumas. , 2020, European journal of radiology.

[19]  F. Iacobellis,et al.  CT Protocol Optimization in Trauma Imaging: A Review of Current Evidence , 2020, Current Radiology Reports.

[20]  F. Iacobellis,et al.  The additional value of the arterial phase in the CT assessment of liver vascular injuries after high-energy blunt trauma , 2019, Emergency Radiology.

[21]  V. Miele,et al.  Acute penile trauma: imaging features in the emergency setting , 2019, La radiologia medica.

[22]  S. Ianniello,et al.  Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and comparison with color Doppler ultrasound and magnetic resonance in a case of scrotal trauma , 2019, Journal of Ultrasound.

[23]  A. Sodickson,et al.  Virtual monoenergetic dual-energy CT for evaluation of hepatic and splenic lacerations , 2019, Emergency Radiology.

[24]  N. Gagliardi,et al.  Role of multidetector computed tomography in the assessment of pancreatic injuries after blunt trauma: a multicenter experience. , 2019, Gland surgery.

[25]  A. Leppäniemi,et al.  Nonoperative management of solid abdominal organ injuries: From past to present , 2019, Scandinavian journal of surgery : SJS : official organ for the Finnish Surgical Society and the Scandinavian Surgical Society.

[26]  F. Iacobellis,et al.  Non-Operative Management of Blunt Liver Trauma: Safety, Efficacy and Complications of a Standardized Treatment Protocol , 2019, Bulletin of emergency and trauma.

[27]  Mirko D'Onofrio,et al.  The EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations for the Clinical Practice of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in Non-Hepatic Applications: Update 2017 (Long Version) , 2018, Ultraschall in der Medizin - European Journal of Ultrasound.

[28]  D. Candinas,et al.  Follow-Up Imaging in Patients with Blunt Splenic or Hepatic Injury Managed Nonoperatively , 2018, The American surgeon.

[29]  T. Zingg,et al.  Proposal of a new preliminary scoring tool for early identification of significant blunt bowel and mesenteric injuries in patients at risk after road traffic crashes , 2018, European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery.

[30]  I. Lovrić,et al.  Pulmonary contusions after blunt chest trauma: clinical significance and evaluation of patient management , 2018, European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery.

[31]  S. di Saverio,et al.  Educational Review of Predictive Value and Findings of Computed Tomography Scan in Diagnosing Bowel and Mesenteric Injuries after Blunt Trauma: Correlation with Trauma Surgery Findings in 163 Patients , 2017, Canadian Association of Radiologists journal = Journal l'Association canadienne des radiologistes.

[32]  F. Iacobellis,et al.  Non operative management of blunt splenic trauma: a prospective evaluation of a standardized treatment protocol , 2016, European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery.

[33]  V. Miele,et al.  Comparison between MRI and CEUS in the follow-up of patients with blunt abdominal trauma managed conservatively , 2015, La radiologia medica.

[34]  F. Helgstrand,et al.  Hepatic pseudoaneurysm after traumatic liver injury; is CT follow-up warranted? , 2014, Journal of trauma management & outcomes.

[35]  J. Soto,et al.  Active hemorrhage and vascular injuries in splenic trauma: utility of the arterial phase in multidetector CT. , 2013, Radiology.

[36]  D. Kool,et al.  Selective computed tomography (CT) versus routine thoracoabdominal CT for high-energy blunt-trauma patients. , 2013, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[37]  T. Hatsukami,et al.  Blunt abdominal aortic injury. , 2010, Journal of vascular surgery.

[38]  David M. Williams,et al.  Traumatic Aortic Injury: Computerized Tomographic Findings at Presentation and After Conservative Therapy , 2010, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[39]  Charles C. Miller,et al.  Blunt traumatic aortic injury: initial experience with endovascular repair. , 2009, Journal of vascular surgery.

[40]  S. McPherson,et al.  Thoracic Aortic and Great Vessel Trauma and Its Management , 2007, Seminars in interventional radiology.

[41]  C. Acampora,et al.  Role of multidetector row computed tomography in the assessment of adrenal gland injuries. , 2006, European journal of radiology.

[42]  M. Alagiri,et al.  Traumatic adrenal injuries. , 2005, The Journal of urology.

[43]  L. Romano,et al.  Role of contrast-enhanced helical CT in the evaluation of acute thoracic aortic injuries after blunt chest trauma , 2001, European Radiology.