Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance the Role of Still-frame Parametric Imaging in Magnetic Resonance Assessment of Left Ventricular Wall Motion by Non-cardiologists

BACKGROUND Cardiac magnetic resonance (MR) images are often reviewed by non-cardiologists who are not trained in the interpretation of regional left ventricular (LV) function. We hypothesized that the use of still-frame parametric MR images of wall motion could aid in the assessment of regional LV function. METHODS Dynamic, electrocardiogram-gated, steady-state free precession (FIESTA) short-axis images were obtained in 6 to 10 slices in 18 consecutive patients. Each loop was used to automatically generate a still-frame image, in which each pixel is assigned a value equal to the amplitude of cyclic variation in local intensity, resulting in higher intensity in pixels that change between blood and tissue during the cardiac cycle. The dynamic images were reviewed by an expert cardiologist who provided gold standard grades for regional wall motion and by four radiologists. Then the radiologists reviewed and graded the same MR images in combination with parametric images. Grades assigned to each segment in the two sessions were compared with the gold standard. RESULTS According to expert interpretation, 6 patients had normal wall motion, and 12 had wall motion abnormalities. Parametric images showed a bright band in the area spanned by endocardial motion, with reduced brightness and thickness in areas of hypokinesis. The agreement between the radiologists' grades and the gold standard significantly improved by adding parametric images (from 77% to 81%), which also resulted in reduced interobserver variability (from 52% to 33%). CONCLUSIONS Still-frame parametric images aid in the assessment of regional wall motion by non-cardiologists who are required to interpret cardiac images.

[1]  S. Khuri,et al.  Quantitative two-dimensional echocardiographic analysis of regional wall motion in patients with perioperative myocardial infarction. , 1984, Circulation.

[2]  G. Gregoratos,et al.  Guidelines for training in adult cardiovascular medicine. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[3]  C L Feldman,et al.  Quantitative detection of regional left ventricular contraction abnormalities by two-dimensional echocardiography. II. Accuracy in coronary artery disease. , 1981, Circulation.

[4]  E Picano,et al.  Stress echocardiography and the human factor: the importance of being expert. , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  A. Weyman,et al.  Task force 4: Training in echocardiography , 1995 .

[6]  Roberto M. Lang,et al.  Improvement in echocardiographic evaluation of left ventricular wall motion using still-frame parametric imaging , 2002 .

[7]  S M Collins,et al.  Heterogeneity of left ventricular segmental wall thickening and excursion in 2-dimensional echocardiograms of normal human subjects. , 1983, The American journal of cardiology.

[8]  J B Seward,et al.  Guidelines for training in adult cardiovascular medicine. Core Cardiology Training Symposium (COCATS). Task Force 4: training in echocardiography. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  P D Clayton,et al.  Quantitative Analysis of Segmental Wall Motion Throughout Systole and Diastole in the Normal Human Left Ventricle , 1982, Circulation.

[10]  J. Seward,et al.  Recommendations for training in performance and interpretation of stress echocardiography. Committee on Physician Training and Education of the American Society of Echocardiography. , 1998, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[11]  I Schnittger,et al.  Computerized quantitative analysis of left ventricular wall motion by two-dimensional echocardiography. , 1984, Circulation.

[12]  D S Segar,et al.  Improved left ventricular endocardial border delineation and opacification with OPTISON (FS069), a new echocardiographic contrast agent. Results of a phase III Multicenter Trial. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[13]  G. Maurer,et al.  Quantitation of Regional Cardiac Function by Two–dimensional Echocardiography: I. Patterns of Contraction in the Normal Left Ventricle , 1983, Circulation.

[14]  H W Woo,et al.  Advantages and applications of the centerline method for characterizing regional ventricular function. , 1986, Circulation.

[15]  N. Reichek,et al.  Recommendations for quantitation of the left ventricle by two-dimensional echocardiography. American Society of Echocardiography Committee on Standards, Subcommittee on Quantitation of Two-Dimensional Echocardiograms. , 1989, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[16]  C. Feldman,et al.  Quantitative Detection of Regional Left Ventricular Contraction Abnormalities by Two‐dimensional Echocardiography.: I. Analysis of Methods , 1981, Circulation.

[17]  M. Laks,et al.  Quantitative analysis of segmental wall motion during maximal upright dynamic exercise: variability in normal adults. , 1986, Circulation.

[18]  T. Ryan,et al.  Color coding of digitized echocardiograms: description of a new technique and application in detecting and correcting for cardiac translation. , 1994, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[19]  C J Slager,et al.  Comparison of models for quantitative left ventricular wall motion analysis from two-dimensional echocardiograms during acute myocardial infarction. , 1993, The American journal of cardiology.