The use of temporary anchorage devices for molar intrusion.

BACKGROUND This article reviews the use of temporary anchorage devices (TADs) for maxillary molar intrusion. TYPES OF STUDIES REVIEWED The authors reviewed clinical, radiographic and histologic studies and case reports. The studies provided information regarding the application, placement and biological response of orthodontic TADs. RESULTS TAD-supported molar intrusion is controlled and timely and may be accomplished without the need for full-arch brackets and wires. Supraerupted maxillary first molars can be intruded 3 to 8 millimeters in 7.5 months (approximately 0.5-1.0 mm per month), without loss of tooth vitality, adverse periodontal response or radiographically evident root resorption. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS True molar intrusion can be achieved successfully with orthodontic TADs, re-establishing a functional posterior occlusion and reducing the need for prosthetic crown reduction.

[1]  Bart Vande Vannet,et al.  Root repair after injury from mini-screw. , 2005, Clinical oral implants research.

[2]  J. Burch,et al.  Intrusion of supererupted molars with titanium miniplate anchorage. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[3]  Doo-Hyung Kim,et al.  Intrusion of posterior teeth using mini-screw implants. , 2003, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[4]  C. Burstone,et al.  Effects of a fixed magnetic appliance on the dentofacial complex. , 1989, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[5]  Peter Diedrich,et al.  Clinical Suitability of Titanium Microscrews for Orthodontic Anchorage—Preliminary Experiences , 2004, Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie.

[6]  Jang-Jaer Lee,et al.  Maxillary molar intrusion with fixed appliances and mini-implant anchorage studied in three dimensions. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[7]  Aldo Carano,et al.  Clinical applications of the Miniscrew Anchorage System. , 2005, Journal of clinical orthodontics : JCO.

[8]  K Reitan,et al.  Clinical and histologic observations on tooth movement during and after orthodontic treatment. , 1967, American journal of orthodontics.

[9]  J. Hupp,et al.  Contemporary Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery , 1993, STOMATOLOGY EDU JOURNAL.

[10]  P. Branemark,et al.  An experimental and clinical study of osseointegrated implants penetrating the nasal cavity and maxillary sinus. , 1984, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[11]  R. Nanda,et al.  The use of skeletal anchorage in open bite treatment: a cephalometric evaluation. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[12]  J. Holmes,et al.  Mini-implant temporary anchorage devices: orthodontic applications. , 2008, Compendium of continuing education in dentistry.

[13]  J. Burch,et al.  Closing anterior open bites by intruding molars with titanium miniplate anchorage. , 2002, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[14]  P. Damoulis,et al.  Evaluation of maxillary sinus membrane response following elevation with the crestal osteotome technique in human cadavers. , 2001, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[15]  Jason B. Cope,et al.  Temporary anchorage devices in orthodontics: A paradigm shift , 2005 .

[16]  R. Schmelzle,et al.  [Odontogenic diseases of the maxillary sinus]. , 1982, Archives of oto-rhino-laryngology.

[17]  Hamilton Medical Ag,et al.  510(k) Summary , 2007 .

[18]  Shouichi Miyawaki,et al.  Factors associated with the stability of titanium screws placed in the posterior region for orthodontic anchorage. , 2003, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[19]  R Kanomi,et al.  Mini-implant for orthodontic anchorage. , 1997, Journal of clinical orthodontics : JCO.

[20]  C. Misch Contemporary Implant Dentistry , 1993 .

[21]  B. Melsen,et al.  Upper molar intrusion. , 1996, Journal of clinical orthodontics : JCO.

[22]  J. Cope,et al.  Miniscrew implants: IMTEC Mini Ortho Implants , 2005 .

[23]  N. Erverdi,et al.  New generation open-bite treatment with zygomatic anchorage. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[24]  M. Sevimay,et al.  Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effect of different bone quality on stress distribution in an implant-supported crown. , 2005, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[25]  R. Jaffin,et al.  The excessive loss of Branemark fixtures in type IV bone: a 5-year analysis. , 1991, Journal of periodontology.

[26]  B. Thilander,et al.  Palatal suture closure in man from 15 to 35 years of age. , 1977, American journal of orthodontics.

[27]  H. Kyung,et al.  Micro-implant anchorage for treatment of skeletal Class I bialveolar protrusion. , 2001, Journal of clinical orthodontics : JCO.

[28]  W. Roberts,et al.  Rigid endosseous implant utilized as anchorage to protract molars and close an atrophic extraction site. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[29]  Hyo-Sang Park,et al.  Factors affecting the clinical success of screw implants used as orthodontic anchorage. , 2006, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[30]  Sang-Heng Kok,et al.  A prospective study of the risk factors associated with failure of mini-implants used for orthodontic anchorage. , 2004, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[31]  E. F. Harris,et al.  Apical root resorption in orthodontically treated subjects: analysis of edgewise and light wire mechanics. , 1994, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[32]  H. Mitani,et al.  Skeletal anchorage system for open-bite correction. , 1999, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[33]  B. Melsen,et al.  Miniscrew Implants: The Aarhus Anchorage System , 2005 .

[34]  Dirk Wiechmann,et al.  Load-related implant reaction of mini-implants used for orthodontic anchorage. , 2005, Clinical oral implants research.

[35]  N. Erverdi,et al.  Apical root resorption of maxillary first molars after intrusion with zygomatic skeletal anchorage. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[36]  P. Vig Orthodontics, current principles and techniques , 1985 .

[37]  H. Mitani,et al.  Treatment and posttreatment dentoalveolar changes following intrusion of mandibular molars with application of a skeletal anchorage system (SAS) for open bite correction. , 2002, The International journal of adult orthodontics and orthognathic surgery.

[38]  J. Subtelny,et al.  Orthodontic relapse, apical root resorption, and crestal alveolar bone levels. , 1987, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[39]  S. Huja,et al.  A radiographic evaluation of the availability of bone for placement of miniscrews. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[40]  I. Huang,et al.  The application of mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage. , 2006, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[41]  D van Steenberghe,et al.  Factors related to success and failure rates at 3-year follow-up in a multicenter study of overdentures supported by Brånemark implants. , 1995, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[42]  Aldo Carano,et al.  "Safe zones": a guide for miniscrew positioning in the maxillary and mandibular arch. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[43]  H. Mitani,et al.  Effects of maxillary molar intrusion on the nasal floor and tooth root using the skeletal anchorage system in dogs. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[44]  C. Jones Chlorhexidine: is it still the gold standard? , 1997, Periodontology 2000.

[45]  J. Schmitz,et al.  AO self-drilling and self-tapping screws in rat calvarial bone: an ultrastructural study of the implant interface. , 2002, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[46]  P. Owman-Moll Orthodontic tooth movement and root resorption with special reference to force magnitude and duration. A clinical and histological investigation in adolescents. , 1995, Swedish dental journal. Supplement.

[47]  S. Kok,et al.  Intrusion of the overerupted upper left first and second molars by mini-implants with partial-fixed orthodontic appliances: a case report. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[48]  B. C. Pai,et al.  Do miniscrews remain stationary under orthodontic forces? , 2004, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[49]  D. Battistutta,et al.  External apical root resorption following orthodontic treatment. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[50]  B. Melsen Mini-implants: Where are we? , 2005, Journal of clinical orthodontics : JCO.

[51]  B Melsen,et al.  Miniscrews as orthodontic anchorage: a preliminary report. , 1998, The International journal of adult orthodontics and orthognathic surgery.