Toward Effective Computer Use in High School Science Education: Where to from Here?

It is suggested widely that the use of computer technology holds great promise for school science education. Such a suggestion is congruent with broader beliefs that implementation of new technology is a key to improving education. However, little is known still about computer use in science classrooms and its effects on students' learning. This paper draws on major findings from recent research, integrates these with theoretical perspectives from associated education literature, and proposes guidelines for orienting computer use in high school science classrooms. It is proposed that (a) pedagogy should be strongly informed by appropriate theoretical orientations, (b) the importance of models in science should be acknowledged in pedagogy and in software development, (c) developing students' metacognition during instruction involving computers should be focussed upon, and (d) teachers' and students' beliefs and epistemologies should be recognised as key factors in educational change involving computer implementation and use.

[1]  Kenneth Tobin,et al.  A social constructivist perspective on learning environments , 1997 .

[2]  Marcia C. Linn Science Education and the Challenge of Technology. , 1988 .

[3]  Pamela McCorduck The Universal Machine: Confessions of a Technological Optimist , 1985 .

[4]  R. Gunstone,et al.  Conceptual Change in Science through Collaborative Learning at the Computer. , 1997 .

[5]  Kenneth Tobin,et al.  What happens in high school science classrooms , 1987 .

[6]  Mike G Stevens,et al.  Gold--Its Extraction and the Environment: Experiences in Papua New Guinea. , 1998 .

[7]  Allan Collins,et al.  Toward a Design Science of Education , 1992 .

[8]  Michael Shayer,et al.  Really Raising Standards: Cognitive intervention and academic achievement , 1994 .

[9]  R. Hackett Young People's Images of Science , 1996 .

[10]  Scott G. Paris,et al.  Models and metaphors of learning strategies. , 1988 .

[11]  P. Wild,et al.  Data‐logging: effects on practical science , 1996 .

[12]  Robert F. McNergney,et al.  Will Technology Really Change Education?: From Blackboard to Web , 1998 .

[13]  Abbie Brown,et al.  Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in c , 1992 .

[14]  Gregory P. Thomas,et al.  Student restraints to reform: Conceptual change issues in enhancing students' learning processes , 1999 .

[15]  D. Kuhn Science as argument : Implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking , 1993 .

[16]  Campbell J. McRobbie,et al.  The local production of order in traditional science laboratories: A phenomenological analysis , 1997 .

[17]  S. Paris,et al.  How metacognition can promote academic learning and instruction. , 1990 .

[18]  John R. Baird,et al.  Learning from the PEEL experience , 1992 .

[19]  J. Byrne,et al.  Amniotic band syndrome in early fetal life. , 1982, Birth defects original article series.

[20]  D. Kuhn THE SKILLS OF ARGUMENT , 2008, Education for Thinking.

[21]  J. Baird,et al.  Improving learning through enhanced metacognition: a classroom study , 1986 .

[22]  D. Kuhn,et al.  The development of scientific thinking skills , 1988 .

[23]  Herman G. Weller,et al.  Assessing the Impact of Computer-Based Learning in Science , 1996 .

[24]  John Berry,et al.  Investigating pupils' ideas of learning , 1996 .

[25]  R. Driver,et al.  Young people's images of science , 1996 .

[26]  Thomas W. Shiland Probing for Understanding. , 2002 .

[27]  Michael E. Beeth,et al.  Teaching for Conceptual Change , 1998 .

[28]  서정헌,et al.  반도체 공정 overview , 2001 .

[29]  Peter Charles Taylor,et al.  Metaphors as global markers for teachers' beliefs about the nature of science , 1995 .

[30]  Peggy A. Ertmer,et al.  The expert learner: Strategic, self-regulated, and reflective , 1996 .

[31]  Ann L. Brown Knowing When, Where, and How to Remember: A Problem of Metacognition. Technical Report No. 47. , 1977 .

[32]  Mark W. Hackling,et al.  Designing interactive multimedia materials to support concept development in beginning chemistry classes , 1999 .

[33]  J. Myron Atkin,et al.  The OECD Study of Innovations in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education. , 1998 .

[34]  Michael Fullan,et al.  Successful School Improvement , 1992 .

[35]  Kenneth Tobin,et al.  Restraints to reform: The congruence of teacher and student actions in a chemistry classroom , 1995 .

[36]  Derek Hodson,et al.  A Critical Look at Practical Work in School Science. , 1990 .

[37]  Barbara Y. White Computer Microworlds and Scientific Inquiry: An Alternative Approach to Science Education , 1998 .

[38]  John Leach,et al.  Students' understanding of the co-ordination of theory and evidence in science , 1999 .

[39]  Suzanne de Castell,et al.  Telling Tales Out of School: Modernist, Critical, and Postmodern “True Stories” about Educational Computing , 1994 .

[40]  J. Frederiksen,et al.  Inquiry, Modeling, and Metacognition: Making Science Accessible to All Students , 1998 .

[41]  Robin Fogarty,et al.  Blueprints for Thinking in the Cooperative Classroom , 1991 .

[42]  Derek Hodson,et al.  Assessment of practical work , 1992 .

[43]  Joke Voogt,et al.  Use of computers , 1995 .

[44]  Lawrence Ingvarson,et al.  Free at Last? Teachers, Computers and Independent Learning. , 1995 .

[45]  Gillian Smith,et al.  Affordances and Constraints of Computers in Science Education , 1996 .

[46]  Robert Glaser,et al.  Model–based analysis and reasoning in science: The MARS curriculum , 1995 .

[47]  Marcia C. Linn,et al.  The Impact of Technology on Science Instruction: Historical Trends and Current Opportunities , 1998 .

[48]  G. Salomon,et al.  Educational Psychology and Technology: A Matter of Reciprocal Relations , 1998, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[49]  D. Gabel,et al.  The Complexity of Chemistry and Implications for Teaching , 1998 .

[50]  John K. Gilbert,et al.  Models in explanations, Part 1 : Horses for courses? , 1998 .

[51]  Campbell J. McRobbie,et al.  Epistemological and contextual issues in the use of microcomputer-based laboratories in a year 11 chemistry classroom , 2000 .

[52]  David F. Treagust,et al.  Student perceptions of the social constructivist classroom , 1997 .

[53]  John K. Gilbert,et al.  Models in explanations, Part 2: Whose voice? Whose ears? , 1998 .

[54]  Tjeerd Plomp,et al.  The integration of computer use in education , 1992 .

[55]  Ian James Mitchell,et al.  Improving the quality of teaching and learning : an Australian case study - the PEEL project , 1993 .

[56]  P. Whitney,et al.  Practical Disease Modelling with Fruits, Seeds, Bulbs and Tubers. , 1989 .

[57]  M. Linn,et al.  Computers, Teachers, Peers: Science Learning Partners , 2000 .

[58]  Peter J. Fensham,et al.  The importance of reflection in improving science teaching and learning , 1991 .