EFL learner collaborative interaction in Second Life

This paper reports on the task-based interaction of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners in the 3D multiuser virtual environment (MUVE) Second Life. The discussion first explores research on the precursors of MUVEs, text-based 2D virtual worlds known as MOOs. This is followed by an examination of studies on the use of MUVEs in Computer Assisted Language Learning (CALL). The discussion then focuses on an investigation of the Second Life-based text chat of learners located at a university in Japan. Data analysis reveals that the environment, and tasks, elicited types of collaborative interaction hypothesized as beneficial in the sociocultural account of language development. Collaborative interaction identified in the data involved peer-scaffolding focusing on lexis, and correction. The data further showed that the participants actively maintained a supportive atmosphere through the provision of utterances designed to signal interest, and the extensive use of positive politeness. These factors facilitated social cohesion, intersubjectivity, and the consistent production of coherent target language output focused on the tasks. Participant feedback was broadly positive, and indicates that specific features of Second Life such as individual avatars, coupled to the computer-based nature of the interaction, appeared to enhance discourse management, engagement, and participation. The findings suggest that Second Life provides an arena for learner centered social interaction that offers valuable opportunities for target language practice, and the development of autonomy. Areas of potential for future research are identified.

[1]  Vance Stevens,et al.  Second Life in Education and Language Learning , 2006 .

[2]  Mark Darhower.  Interactional Features of Synchronous Computer-Mediated Communication in the Intermediate L2 Class: A Sociocultural Case Study , 2013 .

[3]  Jessamine Cooke-Plagwitz,et al.  New Directions in CALL: An Objective Introduction to Second Life , 2013 .

[4]  Mark Peterson,et al.  Towards a Research Agenda for the Use of Three-Dimensional Virtual Worlds in Language Learning , 2011 .

[5]  Michael D. Bush,et al.  Technology-enhanced language learning , 1997 .

[6]  Mark Peterson,et al.  Learner interaction management in an avatar and chat-based virtual world , 2006 .

[7]  C. Warner.  IT'S JUST A GAME, RIGHT? TYPES OF PLAY IN FOREIGN LANGUAGE CMC , 2004 .

[8]  Lina Lee,et al.  FOCUS-ON-FORM THROUGH COLLABORATIVE SCAFFOLDING IN EXPERT-TO-NOVICE ONLINE INTERACTION , 2008 .

[9]  Vincenza Tudini,et al.  Using Native Speakers in Chat , 2003 .

[10]  R. Young,et al.  Theorizing Affect in Foreign Language Learning: An Analysis of One Learner's Responses to a Communicative Portuguese Course , 2009 .

[11]  Bryan Smith.  Computer–Mediated Negotiated Interaction: An Expanded Model , 2003 .

[12]  Janet K. Swaffar,et al.  Language Learning Online: Theory and Practice in the Esl and L2 Computer Classroom , 1998 .

[13]  A. Ohta,et al.  Negotiation for Meaning and Peer Assistance in Second Language Classrooms , 2005 .

[14]  Rebecca W. Black,et al.  Second Language Use, Socialization, and Learning in Internet Interest Communities and Online Gaming , 2009 .

[15]  Charles Xiaoxue Wang,et al.  Integrating Second Life into an EFL Program in China: Research Collaboration across the Continents , 2009 .

[16]  P. Svensson.  Virtual worlds as arenas for language learning , 2009 .

[17]  Markus Kötter,et al.  Negotiation of Meaning and Codeswitching in Online Tandems , 2003 .

[18]  Etsuko Toyoda,et al.  Categorization of Text Chat Communication between Learners and Native Speakers of Japanese. , 2002 .

[19]  Klaus Schwienhorst,et al.  Evaluating Tandem Language Learning in the MOO: Discourse Repair Strategies in a Bilingual Internet Project , 2002 .

[20]  Dorothy M. Chun.  Using computer networking to facilitate the acquisition of interactive competence , 1994 .

[21]  Mark Warschauer,et al.  Computer Learning Networks and Student Empowerment. , 1996 .

[22]  Garry Molholt,et al.  Quantitative, Notional, and Comprehensive Evaluations of Spontaneous Engaged Speech , 2011 .

[23]  Orlando R. Kelm.  The Use of Synchronous Computer Networks in Second Language Instruction: A Preliminary Report , 1992 .

[24]  E. Goody.  Questions and politeness : strategies in social interaction , 1978 .

[25]  N. Garrett.  Computer‐Assisted Language Learning Trends and Issues Revisited: Integrating Innovation , 2009 .

[26]  Steven L. Thor.  Artifacts and Cultures-of-use in Intercultural Communication , 2003 .

[27]  Lesley Shield.  MOO as a language learning tool , 2003 .

[28]  Mark Peterson,et al.  MOOs and Second Language Acquisition: Towards a Rationale for MOO-based Learning , 2001 .

[29]  P. Brown,et al.  Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena , 1978 .

[30]  Frederick J. Dicamilla,et al.  Socio-cognitive Functions of L1 Collaborative Interaction in the L2 Classroom , 1998 .

[31]  A. Ohta.  Applying Sociocultural Theory to an Analysis of Learner Discourse: Learner-Learner Collaborative Interaction in the Zone of Proximal Development , 1995 .

[32]  Amy Bruckman,et al.  IRC Français: The Creation of an Internet-Based SLA Community , 2002 .