On the Performance of FDD and TDD Systems in Different Data Traffics: Finite Block-Length Analysis

We consider a bi-directional point-to-point links and study the data transmission efficiency of frequency division duplex (FDD) and TDD (T: time) schemes with a bursty communication model. We use the recent results on the achievable rates of finite-length codes to analyze the end-to-end throughput and the data payload for TDD and FDD in the cases with codewords of finite length including the impact of guard time for TDD and guard bands for FDD. Also, in case of TDD we study the impact of adaptive resource allocation on the link throughput. As we demonstrate, TDD-based adaptive resource allocation based on the data traffic improves the performance over non-adaptive TDD and FDD schemes significantly. For instance, consider the data rates 0.1 and 1 bit/symbol and data request probabilities 0.2 and 0.6 in the two different directions, respectively, and Rayleigh fading conditions. Then, for a broad range of codewords lengths and moderate/high signal-to-noise ratios, the implementation of adaptive TDD improves the link throughput, compared to the nonadaptive duplexing by more than 50%.

[1]  Behrooz Makki,et al.  Finite Block-Length Analysis of the Incremental Redundancy HARQ , 2014, IEEE Wireless Communications Letters.

[2]  Behrooz Makki,et al.  Finite Block-Length Analysis of Spectrum Sharing Networks Using Rate Adaptation , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[3]  Erik G. Ström,et al.  Evaluation of the IEEE 802.11p MAC Method for Vehicle-to-Vehicle Communication , 2008, 2008 IEEE 68th Vehicular Technology Conference.

[4]  M. M. Rahman,et al.  Comparison between FDD and TDD frame structure in SC-FDMA , 2012, 2012 International Conference on Informatics, Electronics & Vision (ICIEV).

[5]  Mikael Coldrey,et al.  Integrated Access and Backhaul in Fixed Wireless Access Systems , 2017, 2017 IEEE 86th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC-Fall).

[6]  Klaus Wehrle,et al.  Finite Blocklength Performance of Cooperative Multi-Terminal Wireless Industrial Networks , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[7]  Mario H. Casta¿neda,et al.  FDD and TDD Single-User Capacity Bounds , 2013 .

[8]  Paolo Santi,et al.  Vehicle-to-Vehicle Communication: Fair Transmit Power Control for Safety-Critical Information , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[9]  Hirley Alves,et al.  Ultrareliable Short-Packet Communications With Wireless Energy Transfer , 2017, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[10]  H. Vincent Poor,et al.  Channel Coding Rate in the Finite Blocklength Regime , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[11]  Shaohui Sun,et al.  A comprehensive survey of TDD-based mobile communication systems from TD-SCDMA 3G to TD-LTE(A) 4G and 5G directions , 2015, China Communications.

[12]  Andrea Zanella,et al.  On the Impact of Transmitter Channel Knowledge in Energy-Efficient Machine-Type Communication , 2016, 2016 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps).

[13]  Qi Zhang,et al.  Offloading Schemes in Mobile Edge Computing for Ultra-Reliable Low Latency Communications , 2018, IEEE Access.

[14]  Wai Ho Mow,et al.  The evolution path of 4G networks: FDD or TDD? , 2006, IEEE Communications Magazine.