Evaluation of remote-sensing methods used to differentiate forested wetlands

Accurate assessment of forested wetlands is essential for forest managers in the development of management plans because these areas are considered unsuitable for timber production and therefore affect the allowable sale quantity of the forest. Three methods of quantifying wetland habitats using Thematic Mapper (TM) imagery were evaluated to determine the most effective method of assessing this forest resource. The methods of evaluating the TM imagery were the Kauth-Thomas transformation, principal component analysis (PCA), and a maximum likelihood supervised classification algorithm using TM bands 2, 3, 4, and 5. A summer and winter TM scene was used to allow for those areas that are seasonal and may be dry for periods of the year. The results of this study revealed that the maximum likelihood supervised classification using TM bands 2, 3, 4, and 5 was the most effective method of quantifying wetland habitats. However, this method was the most time consuming and required the user to have good ancillary data and skills in site selection and assessment of those signatures used as input into the algorithm.

[1]  K. Meyer-Arendt,et al.  Utilization of remote sensing in wetland management , 1981 .

[2]  Eric P. Crist,et al.  Comparisons of the dimensionality and features of simulated Landsat-4 MSS and TM data , 1984 .

[3]  T. L. Coleman,et al.  Monitoring forest plantations using Landsat Thematic Mapper data. , 1990 .

[4]  R. G. Best,et al.  Spectral reflectance of hydrophytes , 1981 .

[5]  D. S. Gilmer,et al.  Enumeration of prairie wetlands with Landsat and aircraft data , 1980 .

[6]  J. G. Lyon Landsat-derived land-cover classifications for locating potential Kestrel nesting habitat , 1983 .

[7]  Shirley Dex,et al.  JR 旅客販売総合システム(マルス)における運用及び管理について , 1991 .

[8]  W. J. Langford Statistical Methods , 1959, Nature.

[9]  Mark M. Brinson,et al.  Concepts in wetland ecology , 1990 .

[10]  Michael E. Hodgson,et al.  Remote sensing inland wetlands: a multispectral approach , 1985 .

[11]  O. L. Davies,et al.  Statistical Methods. 6th Edition. , 1968 .

[12]  G. H. Rosenfield,et al.  A coefficient of agreement as a measure of thematic classification accuracy. , 1986 .

[13]  Robert J. Reimold,et al.  Remote Sensing - Wetlands , 1974 .

[14]  M. F. Gross,et al.  Remote sensing of coastal wetlands , 1986 .

[15]  M. Karteris,et al.  The utility of digital Thematic Mapper data for natural resources classification , 1990 .

[16]  M. Kristine Butera,et al.  Remote Sensing of Wetlands , 1983 .

[17]  Michael E. Hodgson,et al.  Remote sensing of Wetland habitat: a wood stork example , 1987 .

[18]  Stephen D. DeGloria,et al.  Interpretation of Landsat-4 Thematic Mapper and Multispectral Scanner data for forest surveys , 1985 .

[19]  F. D. Dottavio,et al.  Potential benefits of new satellite sensors to wetland mapping , 1984 .