Two-tone distortion in the basilar membrane of the cochlea

WHEN humans listen to pairs of thnes they hear additional tones, or distortion products, that are not present in the stimulus1. Two-tone distortion products are also known as combination tones, because their pitches match combinations of the primary frequencies (f1 and f2, f2>f1), such as f2–fl, (n+1)f1 – nf2 and (n +1)f2-nf1 (n = 1, 2,3 ...) (refs 2–4). Physiological correlates of the perceived distortion products exist in responses of auditory-nerve fibres5–8 and inner hair cells9 and in otoacoustic emissions (sounds generated by the cochlea, recordable at the ear canal)7,10–12. Because the middle ear responds linearly to sound13,14 and neural responses to distortion products can be abolished by damage to hair cells at cochlear sites preferentially tuned to the frequencies of the primary tones8, it was hypothesized that distortion products are generated at these sites and propagate mechanically along the basilar membrane to the location tuned to the distortion-product frequency7,8. But until now, efforts to confirm this hypothesis have failed15,16. Here we report the use of a new laser-velocimetry technique17 to demonstrate two-tone distortion in basilar-membrane motion at low and moderate stimulus intensities.

[1]  D O Kim,et al.  Cochlear mechanics: nonlinear behavior in two-tone responses as reflected in cochlear-nerve-fiber responses and in ear-canal sound pressure. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  Effects of altering organ of Corti on cochlear distortion products f2 - f1 and 2f1 - f2. , 1982, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  A L Nuttall,et al.  Inner hair cell responses to the 2f1-f2 intermodulation distortion product. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  W. S. Rhode,et al.  Responses of fibers in the cat's auditory nerve to the cubic difference tone. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  J. P. Wilson,et al.  Basilar Membrane Correlates of the Combination Tone 2f1−f2 , 1973, Nature.

[6]  The Discovery of Difference Tones , 1935 .

[7]  Guido F. Smoorenburg,et al.  Combination Tones and Their Origin , 1972 .

[8]  T. Buunen,et al.  Laser--Doppler velocity meter applied to tympanic membrane vibrations in cat. , 1981, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  D. Mountain,et al.  Changes in endolymphatic potential and crossed olivocochlear bundle stimulation alter cochlear mechanics. , 1980, Science.

[10]  D. O. Kim,et al.  Efferent neural control of cochlear mechanics? Olivocochlear bundle stimulation affects cochlear biomechanical nonlinearity , 1982, Hearing Research.

[11]  J. L. Goldstein,et al.  Neural correlates of the aural combination tone 2f 1 - f 2 , 1968 .

[12]  L. Robles,et al.  Basilar membrane mechanics at the base of the chinchilla cochlea. I. Input-output functions, tuning curves, and response phases. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  L. Robles,et al.  Nonlinear Interactions in the Mechanical Response of the Cochlea to Two-Tone Stimuli , 1989 .

[14]  E. F. Evans,et al.  Psychophysics and Physiology of Hearing , 1979 .

[15]  P M Zurek,et al.  Combination tones at frequencies greater than the primary tones. , 1979, Science.

[16]  B. M. Johnstone,et al.  Measurement of basilar membrane motion in the guinea pig using the Mössbauer technique. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  W. T. Peake,et al.  Middle-ear characteristics of anesthetized cats. , 1967, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  B. M. Johnstone,et al.  The modulation of the sensitivity of the mammalian cochlea by low frequency tones. III. Basilar membrane motion , 1984, Hearing Research.

[19]  D. T. Kemp,et al.  Cochlear Mechanisms: Structure, Function, and Models , 1989, NATO ASI Series.