Use of Amplitude Modulation Cues Recovered from Frequency Modulation for Cochlear Implant Users When Original Speech Cues Are Severely Degraded
暂无分享,去创建一个
Jong Ho Won | Jay T. Rubinstein | Christian Lorenzi | Hyun Joon Shim | J. Rubinstein | C. Lorenzi | H. Shim | J. Won
[1] Jong Ho Won,et al. Spectral-Ripple Resolution Correlates with Speech Reception in Noise in Cochlear Implant Users , 2007, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.
[2] Q J Fu,et al. Effects of noise and spectral resolution on vowel and consonant recognition: acoustic and electric hearing. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[3] Philipos C. Loizou,et al. Simulating the effect of spread of excitation in cochlear implants , 2008, Hearing Research.
[4] Fan-Gang Zeng,et al. Contribution of frequency modulation to speech recognition in noise. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[5] Donald H. White,et al. Physics and Music: The Science of Musical Sound , 1980 .
[6] Brian C J Moore,et al. Speech perception problems of the hearing impaired reflect inability to use temporal fine structure , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[7] G. E. Peterson,et al. Revised CNC lists for auditory tests. , 1962, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.
[8] Qian-Jie Fu,et al. Noise Susceptibility of Cochlear Implant Users: The Role of Spectral Resolution and Smearing , 2005, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.
[9] Michael K. Qin,et al. Effects of simulated cochlear-implant processing on speech reception in fluctuating maskers. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[10] Emil L. Torick,et al. Improving the signal-to-noise ratio and coverage of FM stereophonic broadcasts , 1985 .
[11] R Plomp,et al. The negative effect of amplitude compression in multichannel hearing aids in the light of the modulation-transfer function. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[12] J. Swaminathan,et al. Psychophysiological Analyses Demonstrate the Importance of Neural Envelope Coding for Speech Perception in Noise , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[13] Richard L Freyman,et al. Effects of reverberation and masking on speech intelligibility in cochlear implant simulations. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[14] M. Dorman,et al. Performance of Patients Using Different Cochlear Implant Systems: Effects of Input Dynamic Range , 2007, Ear and hearing.
[15] Lorienne M Jenstad,et al. Temporal envelope changes of compression and speech rate: combined effects on recognition for older adults. , 2007, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[16] Lorienne M Jenstad,et al. Measuring the acoustic effects of compression amplification on speech in noise. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[17] R V Shannon,et al. Consonant recordings for speech testing. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[18] G. Studebaker. A "rationalized" arcsine transform. , 1985, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[19] R. Shannon,et al. Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[20] Lorienne M Jenstad,et al. Quantifying the effect of compression hearing aid release time on speech acoustics and intelligibility. , 2005, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[21] Xing Li,et al. The ability of cochlear implant users to use temporal envelope cues recovered from speech frequency modulation. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[22] M. Dorman,et al. Speech intelligibility as a function of the number of channels of stimulation for signal processors using sine-wave and noise-band outputs. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[23] B. Moore. An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing , 1977 .
[24] Sarah F Poissant,et al. Effects of source-to-listener distance and masking on perception of cochlear implant processed speech in reverberant rooms. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[25] Daniel Pressnitzer,et al. Intelligibility of interrupted and interleaved speech for normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implantees , 2010, Hearing Research.
[26] G P Clarke,et al. External electrical stimulation of the cochlea: clinical, psychophysical, speech-perceptual and histological findings. , 1979, British journal of audiology.
[27] Jay T. Rubinstein,et al. Discrimination of Schroeder-Phase Harmonic Complexes by Normal-Hearing and Cochlear-Implant Listeners , 2008, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.
[28] S. Gelfand. Essentials of Audiology , 1997 .
[29] Eberhard Zwicker,et al. Direct Comparisons between the Sensations Produced by Frequency Modulation and Amplitude Modulation , 1962 .
[30] Kostas Kokkinakis,et al. A channel-selection criterion for suppressing reverberation in cochlear implants. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[31] R V Shannon,et al. Speech recognition as a function of the number of electrodes used in the SPEAK cochlear implant speech processor. , 1997, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[32] R C Bilger,et al. Electrical Stimulation of the Auditory Nerve and Auditory Prostheses: A Review of the Literature , 1977, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.
[33] Tammo Houtgast,et al. A detailed study on the effects of noise on speech intelligibility. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[34] Fan-Gang Zeng,et al. Speech dynamic range and its effect on cochlear implant performance. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[35] B C Moore,et al. Detection of frequency modulation at low modulation rates: evidence for a mechanism based on phase locking. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[36] M Dorman,et al. Consonant recognition as a function of the number of channels of stimulation by patients who use the Symbion cochlear implant. , 1989, Ear and hearing.
[37] P C Loizou,et al. On the number of channels needed to understand speech. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[38] Guy J. Brown,et al. Computational Auditory Scene Analysis: Principles, Algorithms, and Applications , 2006 .
[39] Kourosh Saberi,et al. A common neural code for frequency- and amplitude-modulated sounds , 1995, Nature.
[40] Zachary M. Smith,et al. Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception , 2002, Nature.
[41] Joan Besing,et al. Effects of Noise and Reverberation on Virtual Sound Localization for Listeners With Bilateral Cochlear Implants , 2011, Ear and hearing.
[42] Fan-Gang Zeng,et al. Speech recognition with amplitude and frequency modulations. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[43] Fan-Gand Zeng,et al. Compression and Cochlear Implants , 2004 .
[44] Carl Verschuur. Modeling the effect of channel number and interaction on consonant recognition in a cochlear implant peak-picking strategy. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[45] Dan Gnansia,et al. Temporal-Envelope Reconstruction for Hearing-Impaired Listeners , 2012, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.
[46] Christopher A Brown,et al. Comparing the effects of reverberation and of noise on speech recognition in simulated electric-acoustic listening. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[47] Brian C J Moore,et al. The effects of the addition of low-level, low-noise noise on the intelligibility of sentences processed to remove temporal envelope information. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[48] O Ghitza,et al. On the upper cutoff frequency of the auditory critical-band envelope detectors in the context of speech perception. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[49] Christian Lorenzi,et al. The ability of listeners to use recovered envelope cues from speech fine structure. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[50] Blake S. Wilson,et al. Cochlear implants: A remarkable past and a brilliant future , 2008, Hearing Research.
[51] Jayaganesh Swaminathan,et al. Quantifying Envelope and Fine-Structure Coding in Auditory Nerve Responses to Chimaeric Speech , 2009, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.
[52] T Houtgast,et al. A physical method for measuring speech-transmission quality. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[53] J. Hanekom,et al. An analysis of the effects of electrical field interaction with an acoustic model of cochlear implants. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[54] Kostas Kokkinakis,et al. The impact of reverberant self-masking and overlap-masking effects on speech intelligibility by cochlear implant listeners (L). , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[55] Christian Lorenzi,et al. Speech identification based on temporal fine structure cues. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.