Influence of cavitation phenomenon on primary break-up and spray behavior at stationary conditions

In this paper, a special technique for visualizing the first 1.5 mm of the spray has been applied to examine the link between cavitation phenomenon inside the nozzle and spray behavior in the near-nozzle field. For this purpose, a Diesel axi-symmetric nozzle has been analyzed. Firstly, the nozzle has been geometrically and hydraulically characterized. Mass flow measurements at stationary conditions have allowed the detection of the pressure conditions for mass flow choking, usually related with cavitation inception in the literature. Nevertheless, with the objective to get a deeper knowledge of cavitation phenomenon, near-nozzle field visualization technique has been used to detect cavitation bubbles injected in a chamber pressurized with liquid fuel. Using backlight illumination, the differences in terms of density and refractive index have allowed the distinction between vapour and liquid fuel phases. From these visualization results, two important conclusions can be established: on the one hand, cavitation bubbles have been detected at the nozzle exit for pressure drop conditions at which mass flow was not choked yet. On the other hand, it could be seen that the jet formed by cavitation bubbles spread as pressure drop conditions became stronger. Finally, spray visualization in a nitrogen pressurized chamber has been developed at stationary conditions. In order to analyze cavitation influence on spray characteristics, pressure drop has been modified near the values at which cavitation bubbles have been detected out of the nozzle. Two different test strategies have been used for this purpose: fixing injection pressure, which implied a change in chamber density for each test point, or fixing chamber pressure. Both kinds of measurements revealed a noticeable increment of spray cone angle and spray contour irregularities related with the presence of cavitation bubbles at the orifice outlet. This fact can be assumed as an indicator of atomization improvement induced by the collapse of cavitation bubbles at the nozzle exit.

[1]  Raul Payri,et al.  Determination of diesel sprays characteristics in real engine in-cylinder air density and pressure conditions , 2005 .

[2]  Alfred Leipertz,et al.  Investigation of cavitation in real size diesel injection nozzles , 1999 .

[3]  Raul Payri,et al.  Study of cavitation phenomena based on a technique for visualizing bubbles in a liquid pressurized chamber , 2009 .

[4]  Hiroyuki Hiroyasu,et al.  SPRAY BREAKUP MECHANISM FROM THE HOLE-TYPE NOZZLE AND ITS APPLICATIONS , 2000 .

[5]  Raul Payri,et al.  A new methodology for correcting the signal cumulative phenomenon on injection rate measurements , 2008 .

[6]  M. Tsue,et al.  Analysis of Initial Breakup Mechanism of Diesel Spray Injected into High-Pressure Ambience , 2004 .

[7]  Hyun Kyu Suh,et al.  Effect of cavitation in nozzle orifice on the diesel fuel atomization characteristics , 2008 .

[8]  F. J. Salvador,et al.  Using spray momentum flux measurements to understand the influence of diesel nozzle geometry on spray characteristics , 2005 .

[9]  R. Reitz,et al.  EFFECT OF SPLIT INJECTION ON THE MACROSCOPIC DEVELOPMENT AND ATOMIZATION CHARACTERISTICS OF A DIESEL SPRAY INJECTED THROUGH A COMMON-RAIL SYSTEM , 2006 .

[10]  Manolis Gavaises,et al.  INFLUENCE OF VORTEX FLOW AND CAVITATION ON NEAR-NOZZLE DIESEL SPRAY DISPERSION ANGLE , 2009 .

[11]  Yoav Peles,et al.  Cavitation in flow through a micro-orifice inside a silicon microchannel , 2005 .

[12]  N. Otsu A threshold selection method from gray level histograms , 1979 .

[13]  Raul Payri,et al.  The influence of cavitation on the internal flow and the spray characteristics in diesel injection nozzles , 2004 .

[14]  Morgan Heikal,et al.  A model for fuel spray penetration , 2001 .

[15]  Edouard Berrocal,et al.  Ballistic imaging of liquid breakup processes in dense sprays , 2009 .

[16]  E. Markland,et al.  Discharge Coefficients for Incompressible Non-Cavitating Flow through Long Orifices , 1965 .

[17]  J. Chomiak,et al.  Cavitation: a contributory factor in the transition from symmetric to asymmetric jets in cross-flow nozzles , 2004 .

[18]  Raul Payri,et al.  Macroscopic Behavior of Diesel Sprays in the Near-Nozzle Field , 2008 .

[19]  H. Hiroyasu,et al.  Structures of fuel sprays in diesel engines , 1990 .

[20]  Akio Tomiyama,et al.  Effects of cavitation in a nozzle on liquid jet atomization , 2007 .

[21]  W. H. Nurick,et al.  Orifice Cavitation and Its Effect on Spray Mixing , 1976 .

[22]  S. Collicott,et al.  VISUALIZATION OF CAVITATION IN HIGH-PRESSURE DIESEL FUEL INJECTOR ORIFICES , 2006 .

[23]  K. Ramamurthi,et al.  Characteristics of flow through small sharp-edged cylindrical orifices , 1999 .

[24]  Xlj Xander Seykens,et al.  Gas density and rail pressure effects on diesel spray growth from a heavy-duty common rail injector , 2009 .

[25]  Carlos Guardiola,et al.  Critical cavitation number determination in diesel injection nozzles , 2004 .

[26]  Raul Payri,et al.  Development and validation of a theoretical model for diesel spray penetration , 2006 .

[27]  Raul Payri,et al.  Experimental characterization of internal nozzle flow and diesel spray behavior. Part I: Nonevaporative conditions , 2005 .

[28]  Celia Soteriou,et al.  Direct Injection Diesel Sprays and the Effect of Cavitation and Hydraulic Flip on Atomization , 1995 .