Greedy versus social: resource-competing oscillator network as a model of amoeba-based neurocomputer

A single-celled amoeboid organism, the true slime mold Physarum polycephalum, exhibits rich spatiotemporal oscillatory behavior and sophisticated computational capabilities. The authors previously created a biocomputer that incorporates the organism as a computing substrate to search for solutions to combinatorial optimization problems. With the assistance of optical feedback to implement a recurrent neural network model, the organism changes its shape by alternately growing and withdrawing its photosensitive branches so that its body area can be maximized and the risk of being illuminated can be minimized. In this way, the organism succeeded in finding the optimal solution to the four-city traveling salesman problem with a high probability. However, it remains unclear how the organism collects, stores, and compares information on light stimuli using the oscillatory dynamics. To study these points, we formulate an ordinary differential equation model of the amoeba-based neurocomputer, considering the organism as a network of oscillators that compete for a fixed amount of intracellular resource. The model, called the “Resource-Competing Oscillator Network (RCON) model,” reproduces well the organism’s experimentally observed behavior, as it generates a number of spatiotemporal oscillation modes by keeping the total sum of the resource constant. Designing the feedback rule properly, the RCON model comes to face a problem of optimizing the allocation of the resource to its nodes. In the problem-solving process, “greedy” nodes having the highest competitiveness are supposed to take more resource out of other nodes. However, the resource allocation pattern attained by the greedy nodes cannot always achieve a “socially optimal” state in terms of the public cost. We prepare four test problems including a tricky one in which the greedy pattern becomes “socially unfavorable” and investigate how the RCON model copes with these problems. Comparing problem-solving performances of the oscillation modes, we show that there exist some modes often attain socially favorable patterns without being trapped in the greedy one.

[1]  K. Aihara,et al.  Spontaneous mode switching in coupled oscillators competing for constant amounts of resources. , 2010, Chaos.

[2]  Y. Kuznetsov Elements of Applied Bifurcation Theory , 2023, Applied Mathematical Sciences.

[3]  A. Tero,et al.  Minimum-risk path finding by an adaptive amoebal network. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[4]  Toshiyuki Nakagaki,et al.  Physarum solver: A biologically inspired method of road-network navigation , 2006 .

[5]  E. F. Haskins,et al.  Cell Biology of Physarum and Didymium , 1983 .

[6]  D. Kessler,et al.  CHAPTER 5 – Plasmodial Structure and Motility , 1982 .

[7]  Toshiyuki Nakagaki,et al.  Amoebae anticipate periodic events. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[8]  Klaus-Peter Zauner,et al.  Robot control with biological cells , 2007, Biosyst..

[9]  Michael A. Arbib,et al.  The handbook of brain theory and neural networks , 1995, A Bradford book.

[10]  Masashi Aono,et al.  Spontaneous deadlock breaking on amoeba-based neurocomputer , 2008, Biosyst..

[11]  Kazuyuki Aihara,et al.  Amoeba-based Chaotic Neurocomputing: Combinatorial Optimization by Coupled Biological Oscillators , 2009, New Generation Computing.

[12]  Jeff Jones Approximating the Behaviours of Physarum polycephalum for the Construction and Minimisation of Synthetic Transport Networks , 2009, UC.

[13]  M. Golubitsky,et al.  The Symmetry Perspective , 2002 .

[14]  Tim Roughgarden,et al.  Selfish routing and the price of anarchy , 2005 .

[15]  T. Fujii,et al.  Spatiotemporal symmetry in rings of coupled biological oscillators of Physarum plasmodial slime mold. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[16]  Song-Ju Kim,et al.  Tug-Of-War Model for Two-Bandit Problem , 2009, UC.

[17]  Atsuko Takamatsu,et al.  Spontaneous switching among multiple spatio-temporal patterns in three-oscillator systems constructed with oscillatory cells of true slime mold , 2006 .

[18]  Y. Kuznetsov Elements of applied bifurcation theory (2nd ed.) , 1998 .

[19]  Masashi Aono,et al.  Amoeba-Based Nonequilibrium Neurocomputer Utilizing Fluctuations and Instability , 2007, UC.

[20]  J. Hopfield,et al.  Computing with neural circuits: a model. , 1986, Science.

[21]  Andrew Adamatzky,et al.  Developing Proximity Graphs by Physarum polycephalum: Does the Plasmodium Follow the Toussaint Hierarchy? , 2009, Parallel Process. Lett..

[22]  Song-Ju Kim,et al.  Tug-of-war model for the two-bandit problem: Nonlocally-correlated parallel exploration via resource conservation , 2010, Biosyst..

[23]  David S. Johnson,et al.  Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness , 1978 .

[24]  A. Grębecki,et al.  Plasmodium of Physarum polycephalum as a synchronous contractile system. , 1978, Cytobiologie.

[25]  Kunihiko Kaneko,et al.  ISSUE : Chaotic Itinerancy Chaotic itinerancy , 2003 .

[26]  Song-Ju Kim,et al.  Tug-of-War Model for Multi-armed Bandit Problem , 2010, UC.

[27]  A. Tero,et al.  Rules for Biologically Inspired Adaptive Network Design , 2010, Science.

[28]  T Fujii,et al.  Time delay effect in a living coupled oscillator system with the plasmodium of Physarum polycephalum. , 2000, Physical review letters.

[29]  Masashi Aono,et al.  Beyond input-output computings: error-driven emergence with parallel non-distributed slime mold computer. , 2003, Bio Systems.

[30]  Kazuyuki Aihara,et al.  Amoeba-Based Emergent Computing: Combinatorial Optimization and Autonomous Meta-Problem Solving , 2010, Int. J. Unconv. Comput..

[31]  T. Nakagaki,et al.  Intelligence: Maze-solving by an amoeboid organism , 2000, Nature.

[32]  Kazuyuki Aihara,et al.  A Model of Amoeba-Based Neurocomputer , 2010 .

[33]  Kazuyuki Aihara,et al.  Amoeba-based neurocomputing with chaotic dynamics , 2007, CACM.

[34]  Kazuyuki Aihara,et al.  Resource-Competing Oscillator Network as a Model of Amoeba-Based Neurocomputer , 2009, UC.