Experimental evaluation of model predictive control with excitation (MPC-X) on an industrial depropanizer

It is commonly observed that over the lifetime of most model predictive controllers, the achieved performance degrades over time. This effect can often be attributed to the fact that the dynamics of the controlled plant change as the plant ages, due to wear and tear, refurbishment and design changes of the plant, to name a few factors. These changes mean that re-identification is necessary to restore the desired performance of the controller. An extension of existing predictive controllers, capable of producing signals suitable for closed loop re-identification, is presented in this article. The main contribution is an extensive experimental evaluation of the proposed controller for closed loop re-identification on an industrial depropanizer distillation column in simulations and in real experiments. The plant experiments are conducted on the depropanizer during normal plant operations. In the simulations, as well as in the experiments, the updated models from closed loop re-identification result in improvement of the performance. The algorithm used combines regular model predictive control with ideas from applications oriented input design and linear matrix inequality based convex relaxation techniques. Even though the experiments show promising result, some implementation problems arise and are discussed.

[1]  Håkan Hjalmarsson,et al.  Chance constrained input design , 2011, IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and European Control Conference.

[2]  Jan M. Maciejowski,et al.  Predictive control : with constraints , 2002 .

[3]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  System Identification: Theory for the User , 1987 .

[4]  Bjarne A. Foss,et al.  An MPC Approach to Dual Control , 2013 .

[5]  Christian A. Larsson Toward Applications Oriented Optimal Input Design With Focus On Model Predictive Control , 2011 .

[6]  James B. Rawlings,et al.  Model predictive control with linear models , 1993 .

[7]  Haralambos Sarimveis,et al.  Multiobjective constrained MPC with simultaneous closed‐loop identification , 2006 .

[8]  Yucai Zhu,et al.  System identification for process control: recent experience and outlook , 2009, Int. J. Model. Identif. Control..

[9]  Ian R. Manchester,et al.  Input design for system identification via convex relaxation , 2010, 49th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[10]  Robert R. Bitmead,et al.  Persistently exciting model predictive control , 2014 .

[11]  Zhi-Quan Luo,et al.  Semidefinite Relaxation of Quadratic Optimization Problems , 2010, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[12]  Quang N. Tran,et al.  On the way to autonomous model predictive control: a distillation column simulation study , 2013 .

[13]  Christian A. Larsson Application-oriented experiment design for industrial model predictive control , 2014 .

[14]  L. Ljung Convergence analysis of parametric identification methods , 1978 .

[15]  Håkan Hjalmarsson,et al.  System identification of complex and structured systems , 2009, 2009 European Control Conference (ECC).

[16]  J. Rathouský MPC-based approximation of dual control by information maximization , 2011 .

[17]  Afrooz Ebadat,et al.  Application set approximation in optimal input design for model predictive control , 2013, 2014 European Control Conference (ECC).

[18]  Jay H. Lee,et al.  Model predictive control: past, present and future , 1999 .

[19]  T. Söderström ON COMPUTING THE CRAMER-RAO BOUND AND COVARIANCE MATRICES FOR PEM ESTIMATES IN LINEAR STATE SPACE MODELS , 2006 .

[20]  X. Bombois,et al.  Least costly identification experiment for control. A solution based on a high-order model approximation , 2004, Proceedings of the 2004 American Control Conference.

[21]  Håkan Hjalmarsson,et al.  From experiment design to closed-loop control , 2005, Autom..

[22]  Vladimír Havlena,et al.  MPC‐based approximate dual controller by information matrix maximization , 2013 .

[23]  Xavier Bombois,et al.  Design of least costly identification experiments. The main philosophy accompanied by illustrative examples , 2012 .

[24]  Xavier Bombois,et al.  Least costly identification experiment for control , 2006, Autom..

[25]  H. Genceli,et al.  New approach to constrained predictive control with simultaneous model identification , 1996 .

[26]  Per Erik Modén,et al.  Performance monitoring for model predictive control maintenance , 2013, 2013 European Control Conference (ECC).

[27]  Håkan Hjalmarsson,et al.  Model predictive control with integrated experiment design for output error systems , 2013, 2013 European Control Conference (ECC).