Protein expression pattern of PAWP in bull spermatozoa is associated with sperm quality and fertility following artificial insemination

Post‐acrosomal WW‐domain binding protein (PAWP) is a signaling molecule located in the post‐acrosomal sheath (PAS) of mammalian spermatozoa. We hypothesized that the proper integration of PAWP in the sperm PAS is reflective of bull‐sperm quality and fertility. Cryopreserved semen samples from 298 sires of acceptable, but varied, fertility used in artificial insemination services were analyzed using immunofluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry for PAWP protein. In normal spermatozoa, PAWP fluorescence formed a regular band around the proximal PAS. Anomalies of PAWP labeling in defective spermatozoa were reflected in flow cytometry by varied intensities of PAWP‐induced fluorescence. Distinct sperm phenotypes were also identified, including morphologically normal and some defective spermatozoa with moderate levels of PAWP; grossly defective spermatozoa with low/no PAWP; and defective spermatozoa with high PAWP. Analysis by ImageStream flow cytometry confirmed the prevalence of abnormal sperm phenotypes in the spermatozoa with abnormal PAWP content. Live/dead staining and video recording showed that some abnormal spermatozoa are viable and capable of progressive motility. Conventional flow‐cytometric measurements of PAWP correlated significantly with semen quality and fertility parameters that reflect the sires' artificial insemination fertility, including secondary sperm morphology, conception rate, non‐return rate, and residual value. A multiplex, flow‐cytometric test detecting PAWP, aggresomes (ubiquitinated protein aggregates), and acrosomal integrity (peanut‐agglutinin‐lectin labeling) had a predictive value for conception rate, as demonstrated by step‐wise regression analysis. We conclude that PAWP correlates with semen/fertility parameters used in the cattle artificial insemination industry, making PAWP a potential biomarker of bull fertility. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 81: ???–???, 2014. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  J. Dejarnette,et al.  Adaptation of ubiquitin-PNA based sperm quality assay for semen evaluation by a conventional flow cytometer and a dedicated platform for flow cytometric semen analysis. , 2011, Theriogenology.

[2]  Cary.  Sas/stat ® 9.3 User's Guide the Seqdesign Procedure (chapter) Sas ® Documentation , 2011 .

[3]  P. Sutovsky,et al.  Molecular markers of sperm quality. , 2019, Society of Reproduction and Fertility supplement.

[4]  M. Jiménez-Díaz,et al.  Lectin binding patterns and carbohydrate mediation of sperm binding to llama oviductal cells in vitro. , 2010, Animal reproduction science.

[5]  W. Xu,et al.  Sperm‐borne protein, PAWP, initiates zygotic development in Xenopus laevis by eliciting intracellular calcium release , 2009, Molecular reproduction and development.

[6]  P. Sutovsky,et al.  Biogenesis of sperm perinuclear theca and its role in sperm functional competence and fertilization. , 2009, Journal of reproductive immunology.

[7]  A. Doig,et al.  Inhibitors of protein aggregation and toxicity. , 2009, Biochemical Society transactions.

[8]  Peter Sutovsky,et al.  Application Note : New Instrumentation High Throughput , Parallel Imaging and Biomarker Quantification of Human Spermatozoa by ImageStream Flow Cytometry , 2009 .

[9]  P. Purdy.  Ubiquitination and its influence in boar sperm physiology and cryopreservation. , 2008, Theriogenology.

[10]  P. Sutovsky,et al.  Mechanism of extracellular ubiquitination in the mammalian epididymis , 2008, Journal of cellular physiology.

[11]  F. Platt,et al.  The postacrosomal assembly of sperm head protein, PAWP, is independent of acrosome formation and dependent on microtubular manchette transport. , 2007, Developmental biology.

[12]  B. N. Day,et al.  PAWP, a Sperm-specific WW Domain-binding Protein, Promotes Meiotic Resumption and Pronuclear Development during Fertilization*♦ , 2007, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[13]  P. Sutovsky,et al.  Arachidonate 15-lipoxygenase and ubiquitin as fertility markers in boars. , 2007, Theriogenology.

[14]  J. Diehl,et al.  Relative levels of semen platelet activating factor-receptor (PAFr) and ubiquitin in yearling bulls with high content of semen white blood cells: implications for breeding soundness evaluation. , 2006, Journal of andrology.

[15]  J. Sölkner,et al.  Effects of age and environmental factors on semen production and semen quality of Austrian Simmental bulls. , 2006, Animal reproduction science.

[16]  P. Sutovsky,et al.  Clinical adaptation of the sperm ubuquitin tag immunoassay (SUTI): relationship of sperm ubiquitylation with sperm quality in gradient-purified semen samples from 93 men from a general infertility clinic population. , 2005, Human reproduction.

[17]  G. Evans,et al.  Flow cytometric evaluation of sperm parameters in relation to fertility potential. , 2005, Theriogenology.

[18]  P. Christensen,et al.  A flow cytometric method for rapid determination of sperm concentration and viability in mammalian and avian semen. , 2004, Journal of andrology.

[19]  Lisa M Thurston,et al.  Post-thaw functional status of boar spermatozoa cryopreserved using three controlled rate freezers: a comparison. , 2003, Theriogenology.

[20]  S. Nagy,et al.  A Triple-Stain Flow Cytometric Method to Assess Plasma- and Acrosome-Membrane Integrity of Cryopreserved Bovine Sperm Immediately after Thawing in Presence of Egg-Yolk Particles1 , 2003, Biology of reproduction.

[21]  Saima Hameed,et al.  Differential Ubiquitination of Stallion Sperm Proteins: Possible Implications for Infertility and Reproductive Seasonality1 , 2003, Biology of reproduction.

[22]  G. Perry,et al.  Evaluation of a fixed-time artificial insemination protocol for postpartum suckled beef cows. , 2002, Journal of animal science.

[23]  G. Schatten,et al.  Ubiquitin‐dependent sperm quality control mechanism recognizes spermatozoa with DNA defects as revealed by dual ubiquitin‐TUNEL assay , 2002, Molecular reproduction and development.

[24]  J. Graham.  Assessment of sperm quality: a flow cytometric approach. , 2001, Animal reproduction science.

[25]  M. Bochenek,et al.  Sperm chromatin structure assay of bulls qualified for artificial insemination. , 2001, Theriogenology.

[26]  G. Schatten,et al.  A putative, ubiquitin-dependent mechanism for the recognition and elimination of defective spermatozoa in the mammalian epididymis. , 2001, Journal of cell science.

[27]  C. Thomas,et al.  Fluorometric assessments of mitochondrial function and viability in cryopreserved bovine spermatozoa. , 1997, Biology of reproduction.

[28]  D. Garner.  Ancillary tests of bull semen quality. , 1997, The Veterinary clinics of North America. Food animal practice.

[29]  C. Thomas,et al.  Fluorometric assessments of acrosomal integrity and viability in cryopreserved bovine spermatozoa. , 1997, Biology of reproduction.

[30]  R. Haugland,et al.  Dual DNA staining assessment of bovine sperm viability using SYBR-14 and propidium iodide. , 1994, Journal of andrology.

[31]  R. Oko,et al.  Abnormal Morphology of Bovine Spermatozoa , 1991 .

[32]  R. Hammerstedt,et al.  Analysis of sperm cell viability, acrosomal integrity, and mitochondrial function using flow cytometry. , 1990, Biology of reproduction.

[33]  M. Melamed,et al.  Simultaneous measurement by flow cytometry of sperm cell viability and mitochondrial membrane potential related to cell motility. , 1982, The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society.

[34]  M. Melamed,et al.  Relation of mammalian sperm chromatin heterogeneity to fertility. , 1980, Science.