Linear Parameter Varying control synthesis: State feedback versus H∞ technique with application to quadrotor UA V

This paper focuses on the synthesis of Linear Parameter Varying (LPV) control based on two different LPV control structures. In the first structure the H∞ self-Gain-Scheduling (GS) control technique is used to obtain the LPV controller and in the second method, the composite quadratic Lyapunov function and the quadratic cost function are used to find the optimal state feedback gain. Finally, a six-degree of freedom quadrotor helicopter is used as an illustrative plant to compare the results of both LPV control structures.

[1]  James F. Whidborne,et al.  Linear Parameter Varying control of a quadrotor , 2011, 2011 6th International Conference on Industrial and Information Systems.

[2]  Jeff S. Shamma,et al.  Gain-Scheduled Missile Autopilot Design Using Linear Parameter Varying Transformations , 1993 .

[3]  Tingshu Hu,et al.  Composite quadratic Lyapunov functions , 2002, Proceedings of the 41st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, 2002..

[4]  M. Wongsaisuwan,et al.  Optimal control of quad-rotor helicopter using state feedback LPV method , 2012, 2012 9th International Conference on Electrical Engineering/Electronics, Computer, Telecommunications and Information Technology.

[5]  L. Giarre,et al.  LPV models: Identification for gain scheduling control , 2001, 2001 European Control Conference (ECC).

[6]  P. Gahinet,et al.  A convex characterization of gain-scheduled H∞ controllers , 1995, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[7]  P. Gahinet,et al.  A convex characterization of gain-scheduled H∞ controllers , 1995, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[8]  Pierre Apkarian,et al.  Self-scheduled H∞ control of linear parameter-varying systems: a design example , 1995, Autom..