Succeeding in process standardization: Explaining the fit with international management strategy

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore the fit between process standardization and international management strategy of multinational corporations (MNCs) by assessing the compatibility between process standardization and corporate structural characteristics in terms of asset configuration and headquarters-subsidiary relationships. Design/methodology/approach First, after a literature review on MNCs’ strategy and process standardization, the study suggests two propositions on the fit between corporate international management strategy and process standardization. Second, to empirically examine the propositions, the study investigates the outcome of process standardization in three cases with different strategic and structural contexts. Third, using the propositions and empirical findings, the study proposes a framework for aligning process standardization with MNCs’ structural characteristics. Findings Process standardization has a higher degree of fit in MNCs pursuing global integration where process standardization parallels the need for coordinating interdependencies in the functional structure, and is consistent with the headquarters’ operational control over the subsidiaries. Process standardization has a lower degree of fit in MNCs seeking local responsiveness as process standardization disturbs the financial control relationship between the headquarters and subsidiaries and is less crucial for coordination as the subsidiaries contain the necessary coordination mechanisms. Originality/value The study provides in-depth understanding of how the international management strategy and consequent structural characteristics of MNCs affects process standardization in the course of a global enterprise resource planning implementation. The study proposes conditions of fit for aligning process standardization with asset configuration and headquarters-subsidiary relationships of an MNC.

[1]  Fergal Carton,et al.  Analysing the impact of enterprise resource planning systems roll-outs in multi-national companies , 2003 .

[2]  Prasad Bingi,et al.  Critical Issues Affecting an ERP Implementation , 1999, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[3]  Alexander Davidenkoff Global SAP Systems – Design and Architecture , 2008 .

[4]  Ryan Peterson,et al.  Configurations and coordination for global information technology governance: complex designs in a transnational European context , 2001, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[5]  A. Morrison,et al.  An Empirical Analysis of the Integration-Responsiveness Framework in Global Industries , 1990 .

[6]  D. Campbell III. “Degrees of Freedom” and the Case Study , 1975 .

[7]  Injazz J. Chen,et al.  Planning for ERP systems: analysis and future trend , 2001, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[8]  Sue Newell,et al.  'Best' for whom?: the tension between 'best practice' ERP packages and diverse epistemic cultures in a university context , 2004, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[9]  T. Davenport Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[10]  Derrick E. D'Souza,et al.  Aligning Erp Systems with International Strategies , 2004, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[11]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Process Innovation: Reengineering Work Through Information Technology , 1992 .

[12]  Michael Y. Hu,et al.  Process Standardization across Intra- and Inter-Cultural Relationships , 2000 .

[13]  T. Kostova,et al.  Adoption of an Organizational Practice by Subsidiaries of Multinational Corporations: Institutional and Relational Effects , 2002 .

[14]  M. Hammer,et al.  How process enterprises really work. , 1999, Harvard business review.

[15]  J. Tay,et al.  Measuring International Harmonization and Standardization , 1990 .

[16]  Jahangir Karimi,et al.  Globalization and Information Management Strategies , 1991, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[17]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  Structure in Fives: Designing Effective Organizations , 1983 .

[18]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Enterprise resource planning: multisite ERP implementations , 2000, CACM.

[19]  G. Easton Critical realism in case study research , 2010 .

[20]  Ron Fisher,et al.  Using BPM governance to align systems and practice , 2011, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[21]  T. Davenport The coming commoditization of processes. , 2005, Harvard business review.

[22]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[23]  Bongsug Chae,et al.  National differences and ERP implementation: issues and challenges , 2004 .

[24]  A. Rugman,et al.  A Note on the Transnational Solution and the Transaction Cost Theory of Multinational Strategic Management , 1992 .

[25]  L. Donaldson The Contingency Theory of Organizations , 2001 .

[26]  J. Jarillo,et al.  The Evolution of Research on Coordination Mechanisms in Multinational Corporations , 1989 .

[27]  Steven John Simon,et al.  Control and coordination in global ERP configuration , 2001, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[28]  Blake Ives,et al.  Applications of Global Information Technology: Key Issues for Management , 1991, MIS Q..

[29]  Michael Pidd,et al.  A conceptual framework for understanding business processes and business process modelling , 2000, Inf. Syst. J..

[30]  M. Zairi,et al.  ERP implementation critical success factors-the role and impact of business process management , 2000, Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE International Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology. ICMIT 2000. 'Management in the 21st Century' (Cat. No.00EX457).

[31]  Mojca Indihar Stemberger,et al.  The influence of business process management and some other CSFs on successful ERP implementation , 2009, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[32]  Jos Gamble,et al.  Transferring Organizational Practices and the Dynamics of Hybridization: Japanese Retail Multinationals in China , 2010 .

[33]  Rainer Alt,et al.  Templates-instruments for standardizing ERP systems , 2000, Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[34]  P. Harmon Business Process Change: A Guide for Business Managers and BPM and Six Sigma Professionals , 2007 .

[35]  Jyoti M. Bhat,et al.  Addressing the Complexities of Global Process Harmonization , 2010 .

[36]  Jan Mendling,et al.  Towards a Framework for Business Process Standardization , 2009, Business Process Management Workshops.

[37]  Vincent di Norcia Managing Across Borders: The Transnational Solution , 1991 .

[38]  Hans van Leijen The Role of Contextuality in Process Standardization , 2005 .

[39]  L. Donaldson STRATEGY AND STRUCTURAL ADJUSTMENT TO REGAIN FIT AND PERFORMANCE: IN DEFENCE OF CONTINGENCY THEORY , 1987 .

[40]  Peter Gyngell,et al.  Process Innovation: Reengineering Work through Information Technology , 1994 .

[41]  V. Sethi,et al.  Enterprise Resource Planning Systems Implementation in a Global Subsidiary Organization: Lessons Learned , 2008 .

[42]  Thomas F. Gattiker,et al.  Understanding the local-level costs and benefits of ERP through organizational information processing theory , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[43]  I. Dey Qualitative Data Analysis: A User Friendly Guide for Social Scientists , 1993 .

[44]  Janell D. Townsend,et al.  The framework of a global company: A conceptualization and preliminary validation , 2004 .

[45]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[46]  T. Kostova Transnational Transfer of Strategic Organizational Practices: A Contextual Perspective , 1999 .

[47]  Gonzalo Navarro,et al.  Pattern Matching , 2008, Encyclopedia of Algorithms.

[48]  M. Geppert,et al.  Global, national and local practices in multinational corporations: towards a sociopolitical framework , 2006 .

[49]  Nicola Guarino,et al.  Business Process Management , 2016, Business & Information Systems Engineering.

[50]  Frank Mueller,et al.  Societal Effect, Organizational Effect and Globalization , 1994 .

[51]  Jeanne W. Ross,et al.  Enterprise Architecture As Strategy: Creating a Foundation for Business Execution , 2006 .

[52]  Kristin Braa,et al.  The control devolution: ERP and the side effects of globalization , 2001, DATB.

[53]  J. Jarillo,et al.  DIFFERENT ROLES FOR SUBSIDIARIES: THE CASE OF MULTINATIONAL CORPORATIONS IN SPAIN , 1990 .

[54]  Qing Hu,et al.  Implications of the fit between organizational structure and ERP: A structural contingency theory perspective , 2008, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[55]  Gerald G. Grant,et al.  Strategic alignment and enterprise systems implementation: the case of Metalco , 2003, J. Inf. Technol..

[56]  Andreas Hufgard,et al.  Consolidating Business Processes as Exemplified in SAP ERP Systems , 2011, S-BPM ONE.

[57]  David L. Olson,et al.  Issues in multinational ERP implementation , 2005 .

[58]  Mu'awiyah A Ba Handbook on Business Process Management , 2014 .

[59]  Sarah J. Tracy Qualitative Quality: Eight “Big-Tent” Criteria for Excellent Qualitative Research , 2010 .

[60]  N. Rayner,et al.  ERP Strategy : Why You Need One , and Key Considerations for Defining One , 2011 .

[61]  Anil K. Gupta,et al.  Knowledge Flows and the Structure of Control Within Multinational Corporations , 1991 .

[62]  Mark Leach,et al.  Theory Testing Using Case Studies in Business-to-Business Research , 1999 .

[63]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  What Happens After ERP Implementation: Understanding the Impact of Interdependence and Differentiation on Plant-Level Outcomes , 2005, MIS Q..

[64]  Y. Doz,et al.  The Multinational Mission: Balancing Local Demands and Global Vision , 1999 .