A Signal Detection Approach in a Multiple Cohort Study: Different Admission Tools Uniquely Select Different Successful Students

Using multiple admission tools in university admission procedures is common practice. This is particularly useful if different admission tools uniquely select different subgroups of students who will be successful in university programs. A signal-detection approach was used to investigate the accuracy of Secondary School grade point average (SSGPA), an admission test score (ACS) and a non-cognitive score (NCS) in uniquely selecting successful students. This was done for three consecutive first year cohorts of a broad psychology program. Each applicant’s score on SSGPA, ACS or NCS alone - and on seven combinations of these scores, all considered separate ‘admission tools’ - was compared at two different (medium and high) cut-off scores (criterion levels). Each of the tools selected successful students who were not selected by any of the other tools. Both sensitivity and specificity were enhanced by implementing multiple tools. The signal-detection approach distinctively provided useful information for decisions on admission instruments and cut-off scores.

[1]  Tim Friedman,et al.  Same admissions tools, different outcomes: a critical perspective on predictive validity in three undergraduate medical schools , 2013, BMC medical education.

[2]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[3]  H. Kraemer,et al.  Do logistic regression and signal detection identify different subgroups at risk? Implications for the design of tailored interventions. , 2001, Psychological methods.

[4]  Kirsty N. Prior,et al.  Predicting success in medical school: a longitudinal study of common Australian student selection tools , 2016, BMC medical education.

[5]  J. Cohen-schotanus,et al.  Selection and study performance: comparing three admission processes within one medical school , 2014, Medical education.

[6]  V. Lee,et al.  What does the multiple mini interview have to offer over the panel interview? , 2016, Medical education online.

[7]  T. Andersen,et al.  The predictive validity of using admissions testing and multiple mini-interviews in undergraduate university admissions , 2017 .

[8]  K. Stegers‐Jager Lessons learned from 15 years of non‐grades‐based selection for medical school , 2017, Medical education.

[9]  Howard Wainer,et al.  Estimating Coefficients in Linear Models: It Don't Make No Nevermind , 1976 .

[10]  Kristy J. Lauver,et al.  Do psychosocial and study skill factors predict college outcomes? A meta-analysis. , 2004, Psychological bulletin.

[11]  G. Easton How medical teachers use narratives in lectures: a qualitative study , 2016, BMC Medical Education.

[12]  Carla M. Cortes Profile in Action: Linking Admission and Retention , 2013 .

[13]  C. Abraham,et al.  Psychological correlates of university students' academic performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2012, Psychological bulletin.

[14]  R. Meijer,et al.  On the Use of Broadened Admission Criteria in Higher Education , 2017, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[15]  W. Sedlacek Alternative Admissions and Scholarship Selection Measures in Higher Education , 2003 .

[16]  N. Schmitt Development of Rationale and Measures of Noncognitive College Student Potential , 2012 .

[17]  Ewout W Steyerberg,et al.  Predicting performance: relative importance of students’ background and past performance , 2015, Medical education.

[18]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection theory: A user's guide, 2nd ed. , 2005 .

[19]  Jennifer L. Tomes,et al.  Who's getting the grades and who's keeping them? A person-centered approach to academic performance and performance variability , 2017 .

[20]  J. Borleffs,et al.  Impact of vocational interests, previous academic experience, gender and age on Situational Judgement Test performance , 2017, Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice.

[21]  Maarten J. van der Smagt,et al.  Signal detection theory as a tool for successful student selection , 2017 .

[22]  H Stanislaw,et al.  Calculation of signal detection theory measures , 1999, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[23]  T. Dornan,et al.  Admission criteria and diversity in medical school , 2013, Medical education.

[24]  Chris Taylor,et al.  The impact of attaining the Welsh Baccalaureate Advanced Diploma on academic performance in bioscience higher education , 2016 .

[25]  B. Shulruf,et al.  How the admission criteria to a competitive-entry undergraduate programme could be improved , 2015 .

[26]  Jorge N. Tendeiro,et al.  Measuring non-cognitive predictors in high-stakes contexts: The effect of self-presentation on self-report instruments used in admission to higher education , 2017 .

[27]  B. Shulruf,et al.  The efficacy of medical student selection tools in Australia and New Zealand , 2018, The Medical journal of Australia.

[28]  S. Cabus,et al.  Dropout prevention measures in the Netherlands, an explorative evaluation , 2013 .

[29]  A. Themmen,et al.  The relationship between extracurricular activities assessed during selection and during medical school and performance , 2017, Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice.

[30]  Sarah A. Hezlett,et al.  Fact and Fiction in Cognitive Ability Testing for Admissions and Hiring Decisions , 2010 .

[31]  J. Cleland,et al.  How effective are selection methods in medical education? A systematic review , 2016, Medical education.

[32]  J. van Tartwijk,et al.  Predicting different grades in different ways for selective admission: disentangling the first-year grade point average , 2016 .

[33]  Jorge N. Tendeiro,et al.  Predicting Performance in Higher Education Using Proximal Predictors , 2016, PloS one.

[34]  A multi-site study on medical school selection, performance, motivation and engagement , 2017, Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice.

[35]  Christoffel Reumer and Marijk van der Wende EXCELLENCE AND DIVERSITY: The Emergence of Selective Admission Policies in Dutch Higher Education - A Case Study on Amsterdam University College , 2010 .

[36]  Liane Gabora,et al.  WICS: A Model for College and University Admissions , 2012 .