INTERGENERATIONAL SERVICE-LEARNING IN FIVE COHORTS OF STUDENTS: IS ATTITUDE CHANGE ROBUST?

Service-learning evaluation rarely compares different cohorts of students, so it is difficult to determine whether the findings are reliable. This study compared attitudinal change in five successive cohorts of intergenerational service-learning students (n = 59) enrolled in an introductory gerontology course at a major Midwestern university. Quantitative and qualitative data were used to investigate the attitudes of students. Results indicated that only Cohorts 1 and 2 showed significant positive change at posttest in overall attitude toward the elderly. Additionally, only Cohort 1 showed significant positive change at posttest in overall attitude toward working with elders and on an “I fear getting really old” item. Content analysis of open-ended questions indicated that Cohort 1 had the highest proportion of students with positive attitudes toward their own aging at the end of the service-learning. Possible explanations for these findings and implications for evaluation of intergenerational service-learning programs are discussed.

[1]  Profiles of General Demographic Characteristics 2000 Census of Population and Housing District of Columbia 2000 , 2001 .

[2]  Allison H. Nichols, Kathia Monard.  DESIGNING INTERGENERATIONAL SERVICE-LEARNING COURSES BASED ON STUDENT CHARACTERISTICS , 2001 .

[3]  P. Roodin,et al.  SERVICE-LEARNING IN GERONTOLOGY: AN OUT-OF-CLASSROOM EXPERIENCE , 2001 .

[4]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[5]  Roma Stovall Hanks, Marjorie Icenogle.  PREPARING FOR AN AGE-DIVERSE WORKFORCE: INTERGENERATIONAL SERVICE-LEARNING IN SOCIAL GERONTOLOGY AND BUSINESS CURRICULA , 2001 .

[6]  Rosemary Blieszner, Lisa M. Artale.  BENEFITS OF INTERGENERATIONAL SERVICE-LEARNING TO HUMAN SERVICES MAJORS , 2001 .

[7]  S. Travis,et al.  ORGANIZING, MANAGING, AND EVALUATING SERVICE-LEARNING PROJECTS , 2001 .

[8]  D. Greene,et al.  Reciprocity in Two Conditions of Service-Learning. , 1998 .

[9]  M. J. Norušis,et al.  SPSS 13.0 Guide to Data Analysis , 2000 .

[10]  Robert G. Bringle,et al.  EVALUATION OF AN INTERGENERATIONAL SERVICE‐LEARNING PROJECT FOR UNDERGRADUATES , 1993 .

[11]  L. Dorfman,et al.  Incorporating Intergenerational Service-Learning into an Introductory Gerontology Course , 2003 .

[12]  Christopher R. Ward.  Intergenerational Program Evaluation for the 1990s and Beyond , 1997 .

[13]  K. Pillemer,et al.  Service Learning in Elder Care , 2003 .

[14]  Patricia P. Pine.  Learning by Sharing , 1997 .