Productization of University Services

Purpose – The importance of university-industry co-operation has been recognized, but it has been faced many challenges such as unclear and undefined service offerings from universities and a lack of mutual content and structures. The purpose of this paper is to analyze how productization of services can be used to enhance university-industry (U-I) co-operation. Design/methodology/approach – This paper discusses the nature of U-I co-operation while the main focus is on the enhancement of co-operation through the productization of university services. Results are derived from the analysis of both existing literature and empirical case study. Findings – The study finds that through productization, U-I co-operation can be enhanced and several synergies can be achieved. These are based on well-defined procedures and service packages, which lead to the following things: (i) Better quality and management of services leads to more stable, effective and manageable co-operation; (ii) Communication is more comprehensive and the customer’s perspective can be taken more thoroughly considered; (iii) Productized services are partially standardized and partially customized: standard parts ensure efficient processes while customization ensures the fulfillment of customer requirements. Research limitations/implications – The paper shows that productization is not a solution for all of the challenges of U-I co-operation. Before productized services are useful, collaborators must engage in active communication to map out the common content. Originality/Value – Based on findings it is suggested that productization might help educational institutes and firms to develop co-operation in order to gain better results.

[1]  Anamaria Maftei Relationship Dynamics between University Research Centers and Industrial Firms , 2011 .

[2]  Nancy R. Mead,et al.  Industry/university collaborations: different perspectives heighten mutual opportunities , 1999, J. Syst. Softw..

[3]  C. Grönroos A Service Quality Model and its Marketing Implications , 1984 .

[4]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[5]  Alok K. Chakrabarti,et al.  Corporate strategic objectives for establishing relationships with university research centers , 2001, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[6]  A. Salter,et al.  Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university–industry collaboration , 2009 .

[7]  B. Israel,et al.  Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. , 1998, Annual review of public health.

[8]  Juliana Hsuan,et al.  Service Architecture and Modularity , 2009, Decis. Sci..

[9]  A. Link,et al.  Commercial knowledge transfers from universities to firms: improving the effectiveness of university–industry collaboration , 2003 .

[10]  Kimmo Alajoutsijärvi,et al.  Customer relationships and the small software firm: A framework for understanding challenges faced in marketing , 2000, Inf. Manag..

[11]  Graham Clark,et al.  Service Operations Management: Improving Service Delivery , 2005 .

[12]  M. Balconi,et al.  University–industry interactions in applied research: The case of microelectronics , 2006 .

[13]  I. R. Pashby,et al.  Effective University - Industry Interaction: A Multi-case Evaluation of Collaborative R&D Projects , 2002 .

[14]  Pablo D'Este,et al.  University-industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry? , 2007 .

[15]  Antti Saaksvuori,et al.  Product lifecycle management , 2004 .

[16]  M. Mayo Partnerships for regeneration and community development , 1997 .

[17]  Heinrich Arnold,et al.  Making University-Industry Collaboration Work - A Case Study on the Deutsche Telekom Laboratories Contrasted with Findings in Literature , 2009 .

[18]  R. Lasker,et al.  Partnership synergy: a practical framework for studying and strengthening the collaborative advantage. , 2001, The Milbank quarterly.

[19]  J. Hsuan Impacts of supplier–buyer relationships on modularization in new product development , 1999 .

[20]  Eric Flamholtz,et al.  Organizational success and failure , 2000 .

[21]  Shanthi Gopalakrishnan,et al.  Relationship Dynamics between University Research Centers and Industrial Firms: Their Impact on Technology Transfer Activities , 2001 .

[22]  K. Eisenhardt Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review , 1989 .

[23]  M. Santoro Success breeds success , 2000 .

[24]  Tuomas Ahola,et al.  Purchasing strategies and value creation in industrial turnkey projects , 2008 .

[25]  Alok K. Chakrabarti,et al.  FIRM SIZE AND TECHNOLOGY CENTRALITY IN INDUSTRY-UNIVERSITY INTERACTIONS , 2002 .

[26]  Andrea Piccaluga,et al.  A theoretical framework for the evaluation of university‐industry relationships , 1994 .

[27]  U. Schmoch,et al.  Science-based technologies: university-industry interactions in four fields , 1998 .

[28]  Elina Jaakkola,et al.  Unraveling the practices of "productization" in professional service firms , 2011 .

[29]  Alok K. Chakrabarti,et al.  Building social capital and learning environment in university - industry relationships , 2004 .

[30]  Elizabeth Lank Collaborative Advantage : How Organizations Win by Working Together , 2005 .