An evaluation of two conducted electrical weapons using a swine comparative cardiac safety model

Arrest-related deaths proximate to the use of a conducted electrical weapon (CEW) continue to generate controversy despite a better understanding of the multi-factorial nature of many of these deaths. With the rapid adoption of this technology by law enforcement, and the proliferation of companies entering the marketplace, it is important to have a method to assess the relative safety of these weapons. We had previously developed a model to assess the relative cardiac safety of CEWs. In this study, we use this model to compare the TASER X2 and the Karbon Arms MPID. Our results suggest that the TASER X2 may have an improved cardiac safety margin over the Karbon Arms MPID as determined by a smaller area of cardiac pacing on the anterior chest in our model. This model seems to offer a reproducible means of comparing the cardiac effects of CEWs.

[1]  K. Nagy,et al.  Taser X26 discharges in swine: ventricular rhythm capture is dependent on discharge vector. , 2008, The Journal of trauma.

[2]  Hongyu Sun,et al.  Taser Blunt Probe Dart-To-Heart Distance Causing Ventricular Fibrillation in Pigs , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  E. Downar,et al.  Cardiac electrophysiological consequences of neuromuscular incapacitating device discharges. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  D. P. Zipes.  Response to kroll et al , 2014 .

[5]  M. Kroll,et al.  Response to letter regarding article, "TASER electronic control devices and cardiac arrests: coincidental or causal?". , 2014, Circulation.

[6]  David O. Martin,et al.  Cardiac Effects of Electrical Stun Guns: Does Position of Barbs Contact Make a Difference? , 2008, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[7]  Jeffrey D Ho,et al.  An evaluation of two conducted electrical weapons and two probe designs using a swine comparative cardiac safety model , 2013, Forensic Science, Medicine, and Pathology.

[8]  P. Rahko,et al.  Evaluation of the skin-to-heart distance in the standing adult by two-dimensional echocardiography. , 2008, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[9]  Jeffrey Ho,et al.  Conducted electrical weapon incapacitation during a goal-directed task as a function of probe spread , 2012, Forensic Science, Medicine, and Pathology.

[10]  H. Hutson,et al.  Conducted electrical weapon use by law enforcement: an evaluation of safety and injury. , 2010, The Journal of trauma.

[11]  K. Nagy,et al.  Acute effects of TASER X26 discharges in a swine model. , 2007, The Journal of trauma.

[12]  G. Flaker,et al.  Cardiac safety of conducted electrical devices in pigs and their effect on pacemaker function. , 2011, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[13]  J. Miner,et al.  Human cardiovascular effects of a new generation conducted electrical weapon. , 2011, Forensic science international.

[14]  Douglas P. Zipes,et al.  TASER Electronic Control Devices Can Cause Cardiac Arrest in Humans , 2014, Circulation.

[15]  M. Sheppard,et al.  Localisation and quantitation of autonomic innervation in the porcine heart I: conduction system , 1999, Journal of anatomy.

[16]  Brian P. Martin,et al.  Safety and injury profile of conducted electrical weapons used by law enforcement officers against criminal suspects. , 2009, Annals of emergency medicine.

[17]  R. Hamlin,et al.  Ventricular activation process in minipigs. , 1975, Journal of Electrocardiology.

[18]  James E. Parker,et al.  Pulse Variations of a Conducted Energy Weapon (Similar to the TASER® X26 Device): Effects on Muscle Contraction and Threshold for Ventricular Fibrillation * , 2009, Journal of Forensic Sciences.

[19]  D. Zipes.  Sudden Cardiac Arrest and Death Following Application of Shocks From a TASER Electronic Control Device , 2012, Circulation.