Stalking Resilience - Cities as Vertebrae in Society's Resilience Backbone

This paper presents the EU H2020 project Smart Mature Resilience, which takes advantage of the fact that many cities are committed to become increasingly resilient and have ongoing processes for urban resilience. Smart Mature Resilience develops resilience management guidelines based on a Resilience Maturity Model that engages a growing number of stakeholders and multilevel governance in order for cities to become vertebrae for society’s resilience backbone. In a dual approach, employing a systematic literature review of international resilience implementation approaches alongside group processes with experts, the Smart Mature Resilience project has developed a preliminary resilience maturity model consisting of five stages Starting, Moderate, Advanced, Robust and verTebrate (SMART) and a Systemic Risk Assessment Questionnaire. The SMART Resilience Maturity Model suggests two principal processes for the transition to resilience maturity: (1) A process of increasing engagement and collaboration with new stakeholder types, from local, to regional, to national to European in a growing resilience backbone, and (2) a process of quality improvement of policies for transitioning from a Safety-I to a Safety-II perspective (from risk assessment & mitigation to adaption to future surprises as conditions evolve).

[1]  Simon Peck,et al.  Group Model Building: Facilitating Team Learning Using System Dynamics , 1996, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[2]  Terry M. Williams Systemic project risk management - the way ahead , 2000 .

[3]  Fran Ackermann,et al.  The role of feedback dynamics in disruption and delay on the nature of disruption and delay (D&D) in major projects , 2000, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[4]  Michel Bruneau,et al.  A Framework to Quantitatively Assess and Enhance the Seismic Resilience of Communities , 2003 .

[5]  C. Eden,et al.  Using Causal Mapping with Group Support Systems to Elicit an Understanding of Failure in Complex Projects: Some Implications for Organizational Research , 2005 .

[6]  Fran Ackermann,et al.  Systemic risk assessment: a case study , 2007, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[7]  Ortwin Renn Risk Governance: Coping with Uncertainty in a Complex World , 2008 .

[8]  C. Lomnitz,et al.  Ortwin Renn, Risk Governance: Coping with Uncertainty in a Complex World , 2009 .

[9]  UndpIsdr Unisdr,et al.  Making Disaster Risk Reduction Gender Sensitive:Policy and Practical Guidelines , 2009 .

[10]  Jeremy Walker,et al.  Genealogies of resilience , 2011 .

[11]  Will Medd,et al.  Risk governance and natural hazards , 2011 .

[12]  Colin Eden,et al.  Making Strategy: Mapping Out Strategic Success , 2011 .

[13]  Roy Wendler,et al.  The maturity of maturity model research: A systematic mapping study , 2012, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[14]  Fran Ackermann,et al.  Project risk: systemicity, cause mapping and a scenario approach , 2013 .

[15]  Dilanthi Amaratunga,et al.  Quays , United kingdom Challenges in creating a disaster resilient built environment , 2014 .

[16]  John Quigley,et al.  Systemic risk elicitation: Using causal maps to engage stakeholders and build a comprehensive view of risks , 2014, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[17]  P. Essens,et al.  Managing Risk and Resilience , 2015 .