Frequency and Category Factors in the Reduction and Assimilation of Function Words: EPG and Acoustic Measures

Many studies have observed phonetic and phonological differences between function words and content words. However, as many of the most commonly cited function words are also very high in frequency, it is unclear whether these differences are the result of syntactic category or word frequency. This study attempts to determine whether syntactically defined function words are indeed phonologically and phonetically reduced or assimilated when word frequency is balanced. Three experiments were designed to distinguish the relative contributions of the factors of category and frequency on phonetic and phonological reduction and assimilation. Overall results suggest that syntactic category and word frequency interact with phonetic and phonological processes in a more complex way than previously believed. Experiment 1 measured final t/d dropping, a reduction process, using electropalatography (EPG). Experiment 2 examined vowel reduction using acoustic measures. In Experiment 3, palatalization, an assimilation process, was examined using EPG. Results showed that t/d dropping responds to the factor of syntactic category, whereas palatalization is affected by word frequency; vowel reduction responded to both factors, with a dominant syntactic category effect and a secondary within-category frequency effect. The implications of these findings for models of lexical representation and theories of language acquisition are discussed.

[1]  Rushen Shi,et al.  Perceptual correlates of content words and function words in early language input , 1995 .

[2]  Elisabeth Selkirk,et al.  The phrase phonology of English and French , 1972 .

[3]  Elizabeth C. Zsiga Phonetic alignment constraints: consonant overlap and palatalization in English and Russian , 2000, J. Phonetics.

[4]  Betty S. Phillips,et al.  Word Frequency and the Actuation of Sound Change , 1984 .

[5]  B. Phillips Old English an ∼ on: a New Appraisal , 1980 .

[6]  Dick R. van Bergem,et al.  Acoustic vowel reduction as a function of sentence accent, word stress, and word class , 1993, Speech Commun..

[7]  D. Bolinger,et al.  语言要略 = Aspects of Language , 1968 .

[8]  J. Werker,et al.  Six-Month-Old Infants' Preference for Lexical Words , 2001, Psychological science.

[9]  Janet F. Werker,et al.  The basis of preference for lexical words in 6-month-old infants , 2003 .

[10]  Daniel Gildea,et al.  Form variation of English function words in conversation , 2001 .

[11]  Klaus J. Kohler,et al.  The future of phonetics , 2000, Journal of the International Phonetic Association.

[12]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure , 2001 .

[13]  Elizabeth C. Zsiga Acoustic evidence for gestural overlap in consonant sequences , 1994 .

[14]  Janet B. Pierrehumbert,et al.  Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition and contrast , 2000 .

[15]  Paul D. Allopenna,et al.  Phonological and acoustic bases for earliest grammatical category assignment: a cross-linguistic perspective , 1998, Journal of Child Language.

[16]  Bryan Gick,et al.  An X-Ray Investigation of Pharyngeal Constriction in American English Schwa , 2002, Phonetica.

[17]  J. Werker,et al.  Newborn infants’ sensitivity to perceptual cues to lexical and grammatical words , 1999, Cognition.

[18]  Dani Byrd,et al.  Saying consonant clusters quickly , 1996 .

[19]  William E. Cooper,et al.  Syntax and Speech , 1980 .

[20]  John J. L. Morton,et al.  Interaction of information in word recognition. , 1969 .

[21]  Michael Barlow,et al.  Usage-based models of language , 2000 .

[22]  Wolf Leslau Frequency as Determinant of Linguistic Changes in the Ethiopian Languages , 1969 .

[23]  John J. McCarthy,et al.  A Case of Surface Constraint Violation , 1993, Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique.

[24]  William D. Raymond,et al.  Frequency and predictability effects on the duration of content words in conversation , 2001 .