Inventive progress measured by multi-stage patent citation analysis

Abstract Studies of technological change constitute a field of growing importance and sophistication. In this paper we contribute to the discussion with a methodological reflection and application of multi-stage patent citation analysis for the measurement of inventive progress. Investigating specific patterns of patent citation data, we conclude that single-stage citation analysis cannot reveal technological paths or lineages. Therefore, one should also make use of indirect citations and bibliographical coupling. To measure aspects of cumulative inventive progress, we develop a “shared specialization measure” of patent families. We relate this measure to an expert rating of the technological value added in the field of variable valve actuation for internal combustion engines. In sum, the study presents promising evidence for multi-stage patent citation analysis in order to explain aspects of technological change.

[1]  G. Dosi Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories: A Suggested Interpretation of the Determinants and Directions of Technical Change , 1982 .

[2]  Z. Griliches Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: a Survey , 1990 .

[3]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Uncertainty and technological change , 1996 .

[4]  Daniele Archibugi,et al.  Patenting as an indicator of technological innovation: a review , 1992 .

[5]  Wright,et al.  The Mosaic Of Economic Growth , 1996 .

[6]  Toby E. Stuart,et al.  A Role-Based Ecology of Technological Change , 1995, American Journal of Sociology.

[7]  Devendra Sahal,et al.  Technological guideposts and innovation avenues , 1993 .

[8]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Mapping of science by combined co-citation and word analysis. II: Dynamical aspects , 1991 .

[9]  F. Narin,et al.  Patents as indicators of corporate technological strength , 1987 .

[10]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  An exploration of the science base of recent technology , 1990 .

[11]  A. Arundel,et al.  What percentage of innovations are patented? empirical estimates for European firms , 1998 .

[12]  M. Trajtenberg,et al.  University Versus Corporate Patents: A Window On The Basicness Of Invention , 1997 .

[13]  John Scott What is social network analysis , 2010 .

[14]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994 .

[15]  F. Narin,et al.  Direct validation of citation counts as indicators of industrially important patents , 1991 .

[16]  L. Freeman Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[17]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Mapping of Science by Combined Co-Citation and Word Analysis. I. Structural Aspects , 1991 .

[18]  G. Dosi Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories , 1993 .

[19]  Thomas C. Melvin,et al.  European Patent Office , 2002 .

[20]  M. Trajtenberg,et al.  Universities as a Source of Commercial Technology: A Detailed Analysis of University Patenting, 19651988 , 1995, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[21]  Manuel Trajtenberg,et al.  Patents, Citations, and Innovations: A Window on the Knowledge Economy , 2002 .

[22]  Michael H. MacRoberts,et al.  Problems of citation analysis: A critical review , 1989, JASIS.

[23]  Francis Narin,et al.  Citation rates to technologically important patents , 1981 .

[24]  F. Narin,et al.  Science and Technology as Predictors of Stock Performance , 1999 .

[25]  Noel J. Akers,et al.  The referencing of prior art documents in European patents and applications , 2000 .

[26]  Jacob Schmookler,et al.  Invention and Economic Growth , 1967 .

[27]  K. Pavitt,et al.  Patent statistics as indicators of innovative activities: Possibilities and problems , 2005, Scientometrics.

[28]  E. Garfield Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. , 1972, Science.

[29]  Bjørn L. Basberg,et al.  Patents and the measurement of technological change: A survey of the literature☆ , 1987 .

[30]  R. Tijssen Global and domestic utilization of industrial relevant science: patent citation analysis of science-technology interactions and knowledge flows , 2001 .

[31]  Hariolf Grupp Foundations of the economics of innovation , 1998 .

[32]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Citations, Family Size, Opposition and the Value of Patent Rights Have Profited from Comments and Suggestions , 2002 .

[33]  Jacques Michel,et al.  Patent citation analysis.A closer look at the basic input data from patent search reports , 2001, Scientometrics.

[34]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Inside the black box , 1983 .

[35]  Anthony Breitzman,et al.  Using Patent Citation Analysis to Target/Value M&A Candidates , 2002 .

[36]  E. Mansfield Patents and Innovation: An Empirical Study , 1986 .

[37]  D. Harhoff,et al.  Citation Frequency and the Value of Patented Inventions , 1999, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[38]  M. Trajtenberg A Penny for Your Quotes : Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations , 1990 .

[39]  Hariolf Grupp,et al.  Foundations of the economics of innovation : theory, measurement and practice , 1998 .

[40]  A. Nerkar,et al.  Beyond local search: boundary‐spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry , 2001 .

[41]  S. Breschi,et al.  Networks of inventors and the role of academia: an exploration of Italian patent data , 2004 .

[42]  Stephen A Merrill,et al.  Patents in the knowledge-based economy , 2003 .

[43]  Jean O. Lanjouw,et al.  How to Count Patents and Value Intellectual Property: Uses of Patent Renewal and Application Data , 1996 .

[44]  Martin Meyer,et al.  What is Special about Patent Citations? Differences between Scientific and Patent Citations , 2000, Scientometrics.

[45]  Leo Egghe,et al.  Co-citation, bibliographic coupling and a characterization of lattice citation networks , 2002, Scientometrics.

[46]  John R. Harris,et al.  Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics , 1984 .

[47]  O. Sorenson,et al.  Technology as a complex adaptive system: evidence from patent data , 2001 .

[48]  Manuel Trajtenberg,et al.  Market Value and Patent Citations: A First Look , 2000 .

[49]  Cecil D. Quillen,et al.  Continuing Patent Applications and Performance of the U.S. Patent Office , 2001 .