Taste receptor cells express pH-sensitive leak K+ channels.

Two-pore domain K+ channels encoded by genes KCNK1-17 (K2p1-17) play important roles in regulating cell excitability. We report here that rat taste receptor cells (TRCs) highly express TASK-2 (KCNK5; K2p5.1), and to a much lesser extent TALK-1 (KCNK16; K2p16.1) and TASK-1 (KCNK3; K2p3.1), and suggest potentially important roles for these channels in setting resting membrane potentials and in sour taste transduction. Whole cell recordings of isolated TRCs show that a leak K+ (Kleak) current in a subset of TRCs exhibited high sensitivity to acidic extracellular pH similar to reported properties of TASK-2 and TALK-1 channels. A drop in bath pH from 7.4 to 6 suppressed 90% of the current, resulting in membrane depolarization. K+ channel blockers, BaCl2, but not tetraethylammonium (TEA), inhibited the current. Interestingly, resting potentials of these TRCs averaged -70 mV, which closely correlated with the amplitude of the pH-sensitive Kleak, suggesting a dominant role of this conductance in setting resting potentials. RT-PCR assays followed by sequencing of PCR products showed that TASK-1, TASK-2, and a functionally similar channel, TALK-1, were expressed in all three types of lingual taste buds. To verify expression of TASK channels, we labeled taste tissue with antibodies against TASK-1, TASK-2, and TASK-3. Strong labeling was seen in some TRCs with antibody against TASK-2 but not TASK-1 and TASK-3. Consistent with the immunocytochemical staining, quantitative real-time PCR assays showed that the message for TASK-2 was expressed at significantly higher levels (10-100 times greater) than was TASK-1, TALK-1, or TASK-3. Thus several K2P channels, and in particular TASK-2, are expressed in rat TRCs, where they may contribute to the establishment of resting potentials and sour reception.

[1]  Donghee Kim,et al.  Single-channel properties and pH sensitivity of two-pore domain K+ channels of the TALK family. , 2004, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[2]  Donghee Kim Fatty acid-sensitive two-pore domain K+ channels. , 2003, Trends in pharmacological sciences.

[3]  Donghee Kim,et al.  Functional properties of four splice variants of a human pancreatic tandem-pore K+ channel, TALK-1. , 2003, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[4]  S. Roper,et al.  Sour Taste Stimuli Evoke Ca2+ and pH Responses in Mouse Taste Cells , 2003, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  M. Hunter,et al.  Determinants of pH sensing in the two-pore domain K+ channels TASK-1 and -2 , 2003, Pflügers Archiv.

[6]  J. Desimone,et al.  Modulation of Rat Chorda Tympani NaCl Responses and Intracellular Na+ Activity in Polarized Taste Receptor Cells by pH , 2002, The Journal of general physiology.

[7]  M. Hunter,et al.  Two-pore domain K+ channels-molecular sensors. , 2002, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[8]  S. Roper,et al.  Individual mouse taste cells respond to multiple chemical stimuli , 2002, The Journal of physiology.

[9]  S. Kinnamon,et al.  Acid-activated cation currents in rat vallate taste receptor cells. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  Donghee Kim,et al.  Characterization of four types of background potassium channels in rat cerebellar granule neurons , 2002, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  T. Gilbertson Hypoosmotic stimuli activate a chloride conductance in rat taste cells. , 2002, Chemical senses.

[12]  Edmund M Talley,et al.  Serotonergic Raphe Neurons Express TASK Channel Transcripts and a TASK-Like pH- and Halothane-Sensitive K+ Conductance , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  A. Bigiani Electrophysiology of Necturus taste cells , 2002, Progress in Neurobiology.

[14]  Robert F Margolskee,et al.  Molecular Mechanisms of Bitter and Sweet Taste Transduction* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[15]  S. Simon,et al.  Acidic stimuli activates two distinct pathways in taste receptor cells from rat fungiform papillae , 2001, Brain Research.

[16]  D. Bayliss,et al.  TASK-1 is a highly modulated pH-sensitive 'leak' K(+) channel expressed in brainstem respiratory neurons. , 2001, Respiration physiology.

[17]  K. Grzeschik,et al.  Expression Pattern in Brain of TASK-1, TASK-3, and a Tandem Pore Domain K+ Channel Subunit, TASK-5, Associated with the Central Auditory Nervous System , 2001, Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience.

[18]  J. Desimone,et al.  Acid detection by taste receptor cells. , 2001, Respiration physiology.

[19]  L. Barros,et al.  Modulation of the Two-pore Domain Acid-sensitive K+ Channel TASK-2 (KCNK5) by Changes in Cell Volume* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[20]  Bernd Lindemann,et al.  Hyperpolarization-activated channels HCN1 and HCN4 mediate responses to sour stimuli , 2001, Nature.

[21]  B. Lindemann Receptors and transduction in taste , 2001, Nature.

[22]  P. Stanfield,et al.  TASK-5, a novel member of the tandem pore K+ channel family , 2001, Pflügers Archiv.

[23]  J. Desimone,et al.  Decrease in rat taste receptor cell intracellular pH is the proximate stimulus in sour taste transduction. , 2001, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[24]  B. Hille,et al.  Ionic channels of excitable membranes , 2001 .

[25]  David V. Smith,et al.  Distribution of Gustatory Sensitivities in Rat Taste Cells: Whole-Cell Responses to Apical Chemical Stimulation , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  Donghee Kim,et al.  TASK-5, a new member of the tandem-pore K(+) channel family. , 2001, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[27]  A. Bigiani,et al.  Mouse taste cells with glialike membrane properties. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  M. Lazdunski,et al.  Genomic and functional characteristics of novel human pancreatic 2P domain K(+) channels. , 2001, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[29]  J. Gassenhuber,et al.  Characterization of TASK‐4, a novel member of the pH‐sensitive, two‐pore domain potassium channel family , 2001, FEBS letters.

[30]  Detlef Bockenhauer,et al.  Potassium leak channels and the KCNK family of two-p-domain subunits , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[31]  M. Lazdunski,et al.  The endocannabinoid anandamide is a direct and selective blocker of the background K+ channel TASK‐1 , 2001, The EMBO journal.

[32]  M. Lazdunski,et al.  Molecular and functional properties of two-pore-domain potassium channels. , 2000, American journal of physiology. Renal physiology.

[33]  Toshihide Sato,et al.  Acid and salt responses in mouse taste cells , 2000, Progress in Neurobiology.

[34]  S. Bustin Absolute quantification of mRNA using real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assays. , 2000, Journal of molecular endocrinology.

[35]  J. Ruppersberg,et al.  Intracellular regulation of inward rectifier K+ channels , 2000, Pflügers Archiv.

[36]  D. Bayliss,et al.  The TASK-1 Two-Pore Domain K+ Channel Is a Molecular Substrate for Neuronal Effects of Inhalation Anesthetics , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[37]  R. Margolskee,et al.  The molecular physiology of taste transduction , 2000, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[38]  A. Karschin,et al.  TASK-3, a Novel Tandem Pore Domain Acid-sensitive K+Channel , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[39]  Donghee Kim,et al.  TASK-3, a New Member of the Tandem Pore K+ Channel Family* , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[40]  B. Robertson,et al.  A functional role for the two-pore domain potassium channel TASK-1 in cerebellar granule neurons. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[41]  K. Tonosaki,et al.  Effects of acids on neural activity elicited by other taste stimuli in the rat chorda tympani , 2000, Brain Research.

[42]  Edmund M Talley,et al.  TASK-1, a Two–Pore Domain K+ Channel, Is Modulated by Multiple Neurotransmitters in Motoneurons , 2000, Neuron.

[43]  Ping Zhang,et al.  Inhibition of αβ Epithelial Sodium Channels by External Protons Indicates That the Second Hydrophobic Domain Contains Structural Elements for Closing the Pore , 1999 .

[44]  M. Lazdunski,et al.  Inhalational anesthetics activate two-pore-domain background K+ channels , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[45]  Miguel Salinas,et al.  Cloning and Expression of a Novel pH-sensitive Two Pore Domain K+ Channel from Human Kidney* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[46]  Wei Guo,et al.  Receptor that leaves a sour taste in the mouth , 1998, Nature.

[47]  T. Gilbertson,et al.  Distribution of amiloride-sensitive sodium channels in the oral cavity of the hamster. , 1998, Chemical senses.

[48]  Toshihide Sato,et al.  Sour transduction involves activation of NPPB-sensitive conductance in mouse taste cells. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[49]  J. Desimone,et al.  Acid-induced responses in hamster chorda tympani and intracellular pH tracking by taste receptor cells. , 1998, The American journal of physiology.

[50]  Y. Horio,et al.  Cloning and functional expression of a novel cardiac two-pore background K+ channel (cTBAK-1). , 1998, Circulation research.

[51]  A. Gray,et al.  An Open Rectifier Potassium Channel with Two Pore Domains in Tandem Cloned from Rat Cerebellum , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[52]  M. Lazdunski,et al.  TASK, a human background K+ channel to sense external pH variations near physiological pH , 1997, The EMBO journal.

[53]  T. Sato,et al.  Broad tuning of rat taste cells for four basic taste stimuli. , 1997, Chemical senses.

[54]  M. S. Herness,et al.  Characterization of inwardly rectifying potassium currents from dissociated rat taste receptor cells. , 1996, The American journal of physiology.

[55]  Robert F Margolskee,et al.  Mechanisms of taste transduction , 1996, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[56]  S. Herness,et al.  Characteristics of action potentials and their underlying outward currents in rat taste receptor cells. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[57]  S. Roper,et al.  Reduction of electrical coupling between Necturus taste receptor cells, a possible role in acid taste , 1994, Neuroscience Letters.

[58]  O. Yukio,et al.  Contribution of proton transporter to acid-induced receptor potential in frog taste cells , 1993 .

[59]  S. Kinnamon,et al.  Proton currents through amiloride-sensitive Na+ channels in isolated hamster taste cells: Enhancement by vasopressin and cAMP , 1993, Neuron.

[60]  S. Kinnamon,et al.  Proton currents through amiloride-sensitive Na channels in hamster taste cells. Role in acid transduction , 1992, The Journal of general physiology.

[61]  Toshihide Sato,et al.  Voltage-Gated Membrane Current of Isolated Bullfrog Taste CellslPhysiologyr , 1991 .

[62]  J. Dodd,et al.  Identification of electrophysiologically distinct subpopulations of rat taste cells , 1990, The Journal of Membrane Biology.

[63]  J. C. Kinnamon,et al.  Synapsin I‐like immunoreactivity in nerve fibers associated with lingual taste buds of the rat , 1990, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[64]  D. W. McBride,et al.  Distribution of ion channels on taste cells and its relationship to chemosensory transduction , 1989, The Journal of Membrane Biology.

[65]  Y. Okada,et al.  Ionic basis of receptor potential of frog taste cells induced by acid stimuli. , 1988, The Journal of physiology.

[66]  K. Beam,et al.  Apical localization of K+ channels in taste cells provides the basis for sour taste transduction. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[67]  S. Kinnamon,et al.  Membrane properties of isolated mudpuppy taste cells , 1988, The Journal of general physiology.

[68]  T. P. Hettinger,et al.  Nerve fibers sensitive to ionic taste stimuli in chorda tympani of the rat. , 1983, Journal of neurophysiology.

[69]  S. Roper Regenerative impulses in taste cells. , 1983, Science.

[70]  S. S. Kolesnikov,et al.  Regulation of the conductance and resting potential by extracellular K+ in frog taste receptor cells. , 2000, Membrane & cell biology.

[71]  Kolesnikov Ss,et al.  Regulation of the conductance and resting potential by extracellular K+ in frog taste receptor cells. , 2000 .

[72]  T. Gilbertson,et al.  Cellular mechanisms of taste transduction. , 1999, Annual review of physiology.

[73]  C. Canessa,et al.  Inhibition of alphabeta epithelial sodium channels by external protons indicates that the second hydrophobic domain contains structural elements for closing the pore. , 1999, Biophysical journal.

[74]  Herness Ms,et al.  CELLULAR MECHANISMS OF TASTE TRANSDUCTION , 1999 .

[75]  B. Lindemann,et al.  Taste reception. , 1996, Physiological reviews.

[76]  Y. Okada,et al.  Contribution of proton transporter to acid-induced receptor potential in frog taste cells. , 1993, Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Comparative physiology.

[77]  Y. Okada,et al.  Cation dependence of frog gustatory neural responses to acid stimuli. , 1987, Comparative biochemistry and physiology. A, Comparative physiology.

[78]  Y. Okada,et al.  Contribution of the receptor and basolateral membranes to the resting potential of a frog taste cell. , 1986, The Japanese journal of physiology.