Health Status after Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair in Patients with Heart Failure and Secondary Mitral Regurgitation: COAPT Trial

, Abstract Background— In the COAPT trial, transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVr) with the edge-to-edge device led to reduced heart failure (HF) hospitalizations and improved survival in patients with symptomatic HF and 3-4+ secondary mitral regurgitation (MR) on maximally-tolerated medical therapy. Given the advanced age and comorbidities of these patients, improvement in health status is also an important treatment goal. Objective— To understand the health status outcomes of patients with HF and 3-4+ secondary MR treated with TMVr versus standard care. Methods— The COAPT trial randomized patients with HF and 3-4+ secondary MR to TMVr (n=302) or standard care (n=312). Health status was assessed at baseline and at 1, 6, 12, and 24 months with the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) and the SF-36 health status this prospective sub-study of the COAPT trial, we examined the disease-specific health status outcomes of patients with symptomatic HF and 3-4+ secondary mitral regurgitation randomized to transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVr; n=302) versus standard care (n=312). Compared with standard care, patients randomized to TMVr demonstrated substantially better health status at 1 month with only slight attenuation of this benefit by 24 months. At 24 months, 36% of TMVr patients were alive with a moderately large improvement in health status vs. 17% of standard care patients (number needed to treat=5.1).

[1]  P. Voisine,et al.  Transcatheter Mitral-Valve Repair in Patients with Heart Failure. , 2019, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  M. Mack,et al.  Association of Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair With Quality of Life Outcomes at 30 Days and 1 Year: Analysis of the Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry , 2018, JAMA cardiology.

[3]  M. Mack,et al.  Cardiovascular Outcomes Assessment of the MitraClip in Patients with Heart Failure and Secondary Mitral Regurgitation: Design and rationale of the COAPT trial , 2018, American heart journal.

[4]  C. Metze,et al.  Impact of Frailty on Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair. , 2017, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[5]  J. Daubert,et al.  Precision Medicine for Cardiac Resynchronization: Predicting Quality of Life Benefits for Individual Patients—An Analysis From 5 Clinical Trials , 2017, Circulation. Heart failure.

[6]  S. Blankenberg,et al.  Critical evaluation of the MitraClip system in the management of mitral regurgitation , 2016, Vascular health and risk management.

[7]  J. Hausleiter,et al.  Percutaneous mitral valve interventions in the real world: early and 1-year results from the ACCESS-EU, a prospective, multicenter, nonrandomized post-approval study of the MitraClip therapy in Europe. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  M. Mack,et al.  How to Define a Poor Outcome After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Conceptual Framework and Empirical Observations From the Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valve (PARTNER) Trial , 2013, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[9]  David B. Dunson,et al.  Bayesian data analysis, third edition , 2013 .

[10]  R. Califf,et al.  Changing preferences for survival after hospitalization with advanced heart failure. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  Gabriel E. Soto,et al.  Identifying Heart Failure Patients at High Risk for Near-Term Cardiovascular Events With Serial Health Status Assessments , 2007, Circulation.

[12]  H. Krumholz,et al.  Health status identifies heart failure outpatients at risk for hospitalization or death. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[13]  H. Krumholz,et al.  Monitoring clinical changes in patients with heart failure: a comparison of methods. , 2005, American heart journal.

[14]  Gabriel E. Soto,et al.  Prognostic Value of Health Status in Patients With Heart Failure After Acute Myocardial Infarction , 2004, Circulation.

[15]  L. Stevenson,et al.  Preferences for quality of life or survival expressed by patients with heart failure. , 2001, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[16]  S. Lange,et al.  Adjusting for multiple testing--when and how? , 2001, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[17]  J. Spertus,et al.  Development and evaluation of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire: a new health status measure for heart failure. , 2000, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[18]  Ware J.E.Jr.,et al.  THE MOS 36- ITEM SHORT FORM HEALTH SURVEY (SF- 36) CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK AND ITEM SELECTION , 1992 .